Logic
Logic
Logic
Valid argument:
• A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows logically and
necessarily from the premises.
• The argument’s structure is sound, and the premises provide sufficient
support for the conclusion.
Example:
• Premises 1: All human are mortal.
• Premises 2: Socrates is human.
• Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Invalid argument:
An invalid argument is one where the conclusion
does not follow logically from the premises.
The argument’s structure is flawed, and the premises
do not provide sufficient support for the conclusion.
Example:
Premises 1: All cats are animals.
Premises 2: Dogs are animals.
Conclusion: Therefore, all dogs are cats.
In this example, the conclusion does not follow
logically from the premises, making the argument
invalid.
Sound argument:
Sound argument is one that is both valid and has
true premises.
A sound argument guarantees the truth of the
conclusion .
Example:
Premises 1: All numbers that end in 0 are divisible
by 10. (true)
Premises 2: 20 ends in 0. (true)
Conclusion : Therefore, 20 is divisible by 10.(true)
In this example, the argument is both valid and has
true premises, making it sound.
Valid soundness:
1. Logical structure: The argument follows
a logical pattern, such as modus ponens
or hypothetical syllogism.
2. True premises: The statement used as
evidence are accurate and true.
3. Proper inference: The conclusion follows
necessarily from the premises.
4. No fallacies: The argument avoids
common logical fallacies, such as ad
hominem or straw man.
5. Clear language: The terms and concepts
are defined and used consistently.
Invalid soundness:
1. Flawed logic: The argument’s structure is
incorrect, such as affirming the consequent or
denying the antecedent.
2. False premises: One or more statements used as
evidence are inaccurate or false.
3. Improper inference: The conclusion does not
follow logically from the premises.
4. Fallacies: The argument contains logical fallacies,
such as appeal to authority or false dichotomy.
5. Ambiguous language: Term and concepts are
unclear, ambiguous, or used inconsistently.
6. Assumptions: Unstated assumptions or
implicit biases influence the argument.
7. Missing evidence: Relevant evidence is
omitted or ignored.
8. Read herrings: Irrelevant information is
introduced to distract from the argument flaws.
Components of arguments:
I. Claim
II. Evidence
III. Reason
IV. Counter claim
V. How do I develop argument ?
Claim:
A strong claim will be;
1. Take a stand
2. Clarify the relevance of your argument
3. Express your main idea clearly
4. Be specific
Evidence:
The part of your argument
that provides facts/ proof to support your
reasons. Here you provide evidence from
research.
Reason:
After your mom’s
counterclaim, she’ll probably ask, ‘why is it
that you think you need a new cell
phone?’ Then it’s time for the reasons.
Counter claim:
That’s your mom’s counterclaim. A
counterclaim is just the opposite of a claim. In a
more formal way, she might say, ‘ Your current
situation does not….
How do I develop argument?
1) Formulate your main claim. You can start
by drafting a claim, a hypothesis or a
position on an issue…
2) Bring together your reasons and evidence
…
3) Structure your argument. ….
4) Test and refine your main claim.
Conclusion:
A conclusion in an argument. A is
a claim whose truth is supposed to be
established by A. The premises are supposed
to provide support for the conclusion so that
if one grants their truth, then one should
grant that the conclusion is true or,
depending on the nature of the argument,
likely to be true.