Anth
Anth
Anth
versa.
1.1.2.The Historical Development of Anthropology
Anthropology as an academic discipline was born during the 19th
century, out of the intellectual atmosphere of Enlightenment, which is
the eighteenth century social philosophical movement that
emphasized human progress and the poser of reason, and based on
Darwinian Theory of Evolution.
A major impetus for its growth was the expansion of western colonial
powers and their consequent desire to better understand the peoples
living under colonial domination.
Through ethnography and ethnology, the colonialist intellectuals
created the basis for the development of Anthropology as a science.
Ethnography is a holistic study of a given culture group.
Ethnology is a comparative study of culture groups.
1.1.3. Scope and subject matter of anthropology
Investigates the strategies for living that are learned and
shared by people as members of human social groups;
Examines the characteristics that human beings share as
''primitive'' or '' civilized'' and that they are interested in many different
aspects of humans
b. In its approach anthropology is holistic, relativistic, and focused one.
Holistic in a sense that it looks any phenomena from different vantage
points.
The concept of relativity is highly appreciated in anthological studies.
the logic and justification behind group behavior and cultural practices.
e. Another important unique feature is its research approach.
Anthropology is highly dependent on qualitative research to understand
realities in a community.
1.4 Misconceptions about anthropology
1. One misconception about anthropology is related to the area of
its study. It is said that anthropology is limited to the study of
"primitive" societies.
2. Another misconception is that anthropologists only study the
rural people and rural areas.
3. It is also wrongly misconceived that anthropology is the
study/analysis of fossil evidences of the proto-humans like that
of Lucy/Dinkeneshe.
4. It is also misconceived that the purpose of anthropology is to
study in order to keep and preserve communities far from
development and obsolete cultural practices in museums.
1.5 The Relationship between Anthropology and
Other Disciplines
Anthropology is similar with other social sciences such as
sociology, psychology, political sciences, economics, history, etc.
Anthropology greatly overlaps with these disciplines that study
human society.
However, anthropology differs from other social sciences and the
time of the first stone tools (the first artifacts), around 2.5
million years ago, is called prehistory.
b. Historic archaeology
Help to reconstruct the cultures of people who used writing
accents.
Linguistic variation also is expressed in the bilingualism of ethnic
groups.
1.2.4 Socio-Cultural Anthropology
It is also often called social anthropology or cultural anthropology.
It deals with human society and culture.
Socio-cultural anthropology describes, analyzes, interprets, and explains
social, cultural and material life of contemporary human societies.
Socio-cultural anthropologists engage in two aspects of study:
Ethnography (based on field work) and Ethnology (based on cross-
cultural comparison).
It has been sub-divided into many other specialized fields as:
Anthropology of Art, Medical Anthropology, Urban Anthropology,
Economic Anthropology, Political Anthropology, Development
Anthropology, Anthropology of Religion, Demographic Anthropology,
Ecological Anthropology, Psychological Anthropology, Ethnomusicology,
etc.
Ethnography
Requires field work to collect data
Often descriptive
Group/community specific
Ethnology
Uses data collected by a series of researchers
Usually synthetic
Comparative/cross-cultural
EthnologyEthnologyetetEthnologyEt
Unit three
. Human Culture and Ties that Connect
Up on the successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1. Culture Is Learned
Culture is not transmitted genetically rather; it is acquired through
enculturation.
Enculturation is specifically defined as the process by which an
learning.
A symbol is something verbal or nonverbal, within a particular
everyday lives.
Culture comprises countless material and non-material
beliefs.
Instead, culture should be thought as of integrated wholes,
after year.
Culture is changing constantly as new ideas and new
‘non-material culture’.
It is something internal and intrinsically valuable, reflects the
the language they speak, the beliefs they hold, values and
virtues they cherish, habits they follow, rituals and practices
that they do and the ceremonies they observe. It also includes
our customs and tastes, attitudes and outlook, in brief, our
ways of acting, feeling and thinking.
Some aspects of non material culture are listed as follow
Values
Values are the standards by which member of a society define what is
a society.
Norms vary in terms of their importance to a culture , these are:
insist on conformity.
A person who steals, rapes, and kills has violated some of society’s
of them.
Societies can share same beliefs and customs because of borrowing
3) Particularity
Trait of a culture that is not widespread Cultural borrowing – traits once
limited are more widespread Useful traits that don’t clash with current
culture get borrowed
Examples: – Food dishes Particularities are becoming rarer in some way
2.5. Evaluating Cultural Differences: Ethnocentrism,
Cultural Relativism and Human Rights
A. ETHNOCENTRISM
Ethnocentrism refers to the tendency to see the behaviors, beliefs,
values, and norms of one's own group as the only right way of
living and to judge others by those standards.
Our own group is the center or axis of everything, and we scale
they say and do in the light of our values, beliefs, and motives.
Instead, we need to examine their behavior as insiders, seeing it
a cultural trait, act, or idea has no meaning but its meaning only
within its cultural setting.
Cultural relativism suspends judgment and views about the
behavior of people from the perspective of their own culture.
Cultural relativism describes a situation where there is an attitude
meaning as the way of life of one group which has worked out to
its environment, to the biological needs of its members, and to the
group relationships;
Knowing that a person's own culture is only one among many; and
Recognizing that what is immoral, ethical, acceptable, etc, in one
realm of justice and morality beyond and superior to the laws and
customs of particular countries, cultures, and religions.
Human rights include the right to speak freely, to hold religious beliefs
contact.
This usually happens in situations of trade or colonialism.
In situations of continuous contact, cultures have also exchanged
2.7.1 MARRIAGE
2.7.1.1 Rules of Marriage
2.7.1.2 Mate Selection: Whom Should You Marry?
a) Exogamy
This is the rule by which a man is not allowed to marry someone
links people into a wider social network that nurtures, helps, and
protects them in times of need
b) Endogamy
A rule of endogamy requires individuals to marry within their own
the brother (or some close male relative) of her dead husband.
Usually any children fathered by the woman’s new husband are
sororal polygyny.
When the co-wives are not sisters, the marriage is termed as non-
sororal polygyny.
Advantages & Disadvantages of Polygamy marriage
Having two/more wives is often seen as a sign of prestige.
Having multiple wives means wealth, power, & status both for
divorce:
as a form of compensation to the bride’s lineage for the loss of
nuclear families.
The family in which he was born and reared is called ‘family of
orientation’.
The other family to which he establishes relation through
through blood.
2.7.4 DESCENT
Descent refers to the social recognition of the biological
relationship that exists between the individuals.
The rule of descent refers to a set of principles by which an
1. Patrilineal descent
When descent is traced solely through the male line, it is called
patrilineal descent.
A man’s sons and daughters all belong to the same descent group
matrilineal descent.
At birth, children of both sexes belong to mother’s descent group,
3. Cognatic Descent
In some society’s individuals are free to show their genealogical
older persons
Marginalization of religious and ethnic minorities
Inclusiveness and the human rights approach
4.1 Definition of concepts
Marginalization is defined as a treatment of a person or social
group as minor, insignificant or peripheral.
Marginalization involves exclusion of certain groups from social
emotional injuries.
Vulnerable groups are people exposed to possibilities of attack,
harms or mistreatment.
As a result, vulnerable persons/groups need special attention,
world.
Women are exposed to social and economic inequalities involving
practices (HTPs).
Female genital cutting
Female genital cutting (FGC) is practiced in 28 countries in
western, northern and eastern Africa. The prevalence of FGC is
very high in Somali (98%), Djibouti (93%), Egypt (87%), Sudan
(87%), and Eritrea (83%).
Ethiopia is one of the high prevalence countries in Africa.
According to recent reports, 65% of girls and women in 15 to
Addis Ababa (54%) and Dire Dawa (79%). The two regions with
relatively low FGC prevalence are Tigray (24%) and Gambella
(33%).
Health impacts of female genital cutting
There are four major types of FGC.
parts of Ethiopia.
Early/child marriage:
Early marriage has the following major harmful consequences:
Early marriage inhibits girls' personal development; it hinders
husbands.
Early marriage leads to early pregnancies, which increases risks
practice.
Social norms:
Chastity of girls is one of the social norms that influence parents and
11
Unit Five
Understand the basics of ethnic identity and ethnic group –as the
outcome of a dialectical process of internal and external
definition;
Develop greater understanding over the often-contested nature
for “pre-modern” societies and the term “race” was used to refer
modern societies
Due to the close link between the term “race” and Nazi ideology,
after the end of II WW, the term “ethnic” gradually replaced “race”
within both the North American tradition and the European
tradition.
The North American tradition adopted ‘ethnic’ as a substitute for
rooted in ethnicity are ‘indefinite’, the ethnic group, and its close
relative the nation, cannot easily be precisely defined for
sociological purposes.
The next great contribution to our understanding of ethnicity comes from
the influential works of the Norwegian anthropologist, named Frederik
Barth (1969).
Barth in an exceptionally brilliant ‘Introduction’ part of a collection of
scholarly work entitled “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries”(1969), provided
nothing short of a Copernican revolution in the study of ethnicity –in and
outside anthropology.
In his introduction to the collection of “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries”,
Barth (1969), outlined in detail a model of ethnicity.
Barth began with what actors believe or think: ascriptions and self-
ascriptions.
A categorical ascription is an ethnic ascription when it classifies a person
in terms of his basic, most general identity, presumptively determined by
his origin and background.
To the extent that actors use ethnic identities to categorize themselves
and others for purposes of interaction, they form ethnic groups in this
organizational sense.
Barth focused not upon the cultural characteristics of ethnic groups but upon
relationships of cultural differentiation, and specifically upon contact between
collectivities thus differentiated, 'us' and 'them’
Barth's emphasis was not so much upon the substance or content of ethnicity,
what he called the 'cultural stuff', as upon the social processes, which produce
and reproduce - which organize, if you like-boundaries of identification and
differentiation between ethnic collectivities.
As illustrated by Barth, it is important to recognize that although ethnic
categories take cultural differences into account: we can assume no simple
one-to-one relationship between ethnic units and cultural similarities and
differences.
But the features that are taken into account are not the sum of 'objective'
differences, but only those which the actors themselves regard as
significant…
Not only do ecological variations mark and exaggerate differences; some
cultural features are used by the actors as signals and emblems of
differences, others are ignored, and in some relationships radical differences
are played down and denied.
The cultural contents of ethnic dichotomies would seem analytically to be
of two orders:
1. overt signals or signs - the diacritical features that people look for and
exhibit to show identity, often such features as dress, language, house-
form, or general style of life, and
2. basic value orientations: the standards of morality and excellence by
which performance is judged. Since belonging to an ethnic category
implies being a certain kind of person, having that basic identity, it also
implies a claim to be judged, and to judge oneself, by those standards
that are relevant to that identity.
Ethnic categories provide an organizational vessel that may be given
varying amounts and forms of content in different socio-cultural systems.
They may be of great relevance to behavior, but they need not be; they
may pervade all social life, or they may be relevant only in limited sectors
of activity.
In its most general notion, for Barth, ethnicity is seen as a ‘social
organization of culture difference’.
Before Barth, cultural difference was traditionally explained from the
inside out – social groups possess different cultural characteristics,
which make them unique and distinct (common language, lifestyle,
descent, religion, physical markers, history, eating habits, etc.).
Culture was perceived as something relatively or firmly stable, persistent
and intact.
Cultural difference was understood in terms of a group’s property (i.e.,
to be Gamo is to be in possession of a distinct culture to that of the
Wolayita).
According to Frederik Barth (1969), Cultural difference per se does not
create ethnic collectivities.
It is the social contact with others that leads to definition and
categorization of an ‘us’ and a ‘them’;
Hence, cultural difference between two groups is not the decisive feature
of ethnicity.
Indeed, ethnicity is essentially an aspect of a relationship, not a property
of a group.
Nonetheless, Barth turned the traditional understanding of cultural
difference on its head.
He defined and explained ethnicity from the outside in: it is not
point of view becomes the ethnic boundary that defines the group,
not the cultural stuff that it encloses’
The difference is created, developed and maintained only through
interaction with others (i.e., Frenchness is created and becomes
culturally and politically meaningful only through the encounter with
Englishness, Germaness, Danishness, etc.).
Hence, the focus in the study of ethnic difference has shifted from
the study of its contents (i.e., the structure of the language, the
form of the particular costumes, the nature of eating habits) to the
study of cultural boundaries and social interaction.
Ethnic groups are not merely or necessarily based on the occupation
contact between them, and they must entertain ideas of each other
as being culturally different from themselves.
If these conditions are not fulfilled, there is no ethnicity, for
without ethnicity
Only in so far as cultural differences are perceived as being
important, and are made socially relevant, do social relationships
have an ethnic element.
Ethnicity is an aspect of social relationship between agents who
meanings as ethnicity.
By considering the various definitions provided to define ethnicity,
Hutchinson and Smith’s (1996) identified six main features that the
definition of an ethnic group, predominantly consists. This includes;
1. A common proper name, to identify and express the “essence” of the
community;
2. A myth of common ancestry that includes the idea of common
origin in time and place and that gives an ethnic group a sense of
fictive kinship;
3. Shared historical memories, or better, shared memories of a
common past or pasts, including heroes, events, and their
commemoration;
4. One or more elements of common culture, which need not be
specified but normally, include religion, customs, and language;
5. A link with a homeland, not necessarily its physical occupation by
the ethnic group, only its symbolic attachment to the ancestral land,
as with diaspora peoples; and
Ethnic Identity
Typically, ethnic identity is an affiliative construct, where an individual is
viewed by themselves and by others as belonging to a particular ethnic or
cultural group.
An individual can choose to associate with a group especially if other
choices are available (i.e., the person is of mixed ethnic or racial heritage).
Affiliation can be influenced by racial, natal, symbolic, and cultural factors
(Cheung, 1993).
Racial factors involve the use of physiognomic and physical
characteristics,
Natal factors refer to "homeland" (ancestral home) or origins of
structure of human society, and hence something more or less fixed and
permanent
Ethnicity
and ethnic attachment is “natural and innate”, which would never
change over time, and
ethnic membership is fixed, permanent and primarily ascribed through birth.
Ethnic identification is based on deep, ‘primordial’ attachments to that group,
established by kinship and descent.
the ‘core’ of ethnicity resides in the myths, memories, values, symbols and the
between individuals.
Ethnic group is hence a result of group relations in which the boundaries