01 Business Management
01 Business Management
01 Business Management
He contributed the principle of finding the one best way of doing any job and
then training the workers to do the work always using the best way
• Principles of Scientific Management
1. Replace the rule of thumb with science: Taylor has
emphasized that in scientific management, organized
knowledge should be applied which will replace rule of
thumb. Don't use trial and error approach for decision
making and follow scientific methods
2. Harmony not discord: Promote team work and solve the
conflicts by mutual discussions. He has emphasized that
attempts should be made to obtain harmony in group action
rather than discord.
Ideals Dispatching
Common Sense standards and Schedules
Competent Counsel Standard Conditions
Standardized Operation
Discipline
Standard practice instructions
Fair Dealings
Efficiency Reward.
Proper Records
Clearly defined ideals: Establishing clear and specific objectives for
the organization and its members.
Common sense - Efficiency Sense - Productivity Sense: Applying
rational and logical thinking to improve efficiency and productivity.
Competent counsel: Seeking and utilizing knowledgeable advice and
guidance.
Discipline: Implementing consistent and structured approaches to
work and decision-making.
The fair deal: Ensuring fairness in treatment, compensation, and
opportunities for all employees.
Reliable, immediate and adequate records: Maintaining accurate and
timely records to facilitate informed decision-making.
Despatching: Efficiently assigning tasks and resources to achieve
optimal results.
Standards and schedules: Establishing benchmarks and timelines to
guide work processes.
Standardized conditions: Creating consistent and conducive work
environments.
Standardized operations: Developing uniform and efficient work methods.
Written standard-practice instructions: Documenting best practices and
procedures for consistent execution.
This kind of authority is based on clear laws and rules that explain
what people are supposed to do and what they have the right to do.
The neo- classical theory pointed out the role of psychology and sociology in the
understanding of individual and group behaviour in an organization.
This finding emphasized the importance of social factors and the informal
organization in influencing employee behaviour and satisfaction.
• 4. Bank Wiring Observation Room Experiment:
These experiments were conducted to find out the impact of small groups
on the individuals. In this experiment, a group of 14 male workers were
formed into a small work group.
The men were engaged in the assembly of terminal banks for the use in
telephone exchanges.
The work involved attaching wire with switches for certain equipment
used in telephone exchanges.
Hourly wage for each worker was fixed on the basis of average output of
each worker. Bonus as also payable on the basis of group effort.
It was expected that highly efficient workers would bring pressure on less
efficient workers to increase output and take advantage of group incentive
plan.
However, the strategy did not work and workers established their own
standard of output and this was enforced vigorously by various methods of
social pressure.
The workers cited various reasons for this behaviour viz. fear of
unemployment, fear of increase in output, desire to protect slow workers etc.
The Hawthorne experiments clearly showed that a man at work is motivated
by more than the satisfaction of economic needs.
Management should recognise that people are essentially social beings and
not merely economic beings.
As a social being, they are members of a group and the management should
try to understand group attitudes and group psychology.
The following were the main conclusions drawn by
Prof.
1. Social Mayo on the basis of Hawthorne studies:
Unit: A factory is not just a place for work and money; it's also a
group of people who interact socially. People are naturally social, and
this social aspect at work plays a big role in motivating them. The Relay
Room's output increased because the people there worked well together
in a social group and had a good relationship with their supervisors.
2. Group Influence: When workers form a group, they create a shared
emotional connection that makes them act like a team even outside the
formal organization. These groups affect how they behave. Often, the
pressure from a group has a stronger effect on how hard workers work
than what their bosses tell them to do.
3. Group Behaviour: Management must understand that a typical group
behaviour can dominate or even supersede individual propensities.
4. Motivation: Human and social motivation can play even a greater role than
mere monitory incentives in moving or motivating and managing employee
group.
5. Supervision: The style of supervision affects worker’s attitude to work and
his productivity. A supervisor who is friendly with his workers and takes
interest in their social problems can get co-operation and better results from
the subordinates.
6. Working Conditions: Productivity increases as a result of improved
working conditions in the organisation.
7. Employee Morale: Mayo pointed out that workers were not simply
cogs, in the machinery, instead the employee morale (both individual
and in groups) can have profound effects on productivity.
8. Communication: Experiments have shown that the output increases
when workers are explained the logic behind various decisions and
their participation in decision making brings better results.
9. Balanced Approach: The problems of workers could not be solved by
taking one factor i.e. management could not achieve the results by
emphasizing one aspect. All the things should be discussed and
decision be taken for improving the whole situation. A balanced
approach to the whole situation can show better results.
• To be a socially accepted member of the group, a worker
had to avoid being
1. a “rate buster”, who turns out too much work;
2. a “chiseler”, who turns out too little; or
3. a “squealer”, who says something to a supervisor that
could be detrimental to another worker
Born in 1968
Mary Parker Follet
Management is the art of getting things done through others.
American social worker.
Mother of Modern management
Books: Democracy, Human relation, Organisational behaviours, Creative
Experience
Her work contrasted with the “scientific management” of FW Taylor
Some of the focus areas of the Mary Parker Follett Contribution to
Management are conflicts, authority, and leadership.
• Conflict Resolution
Much of the Mary Parker Follett Contribution to Management is about
conflicts.
In Mary Parker Follett’s Theory, she determined that there are three
ways in which conflicts are generally resolved.
Dominance: Dominance is one party beating another party in a conflict.
This is the easiest way to resolve a conflict. However, it’s not a very
successful solution in the long term. It also makes other people in the
team uncomfortable, and the oppressed will always rebel against the
dominance, leading to a loss of focus. Because there has been no
compromise, both sides stick to their viewpoints, which means the conflict
can easily arise again.
Compromise: A compromise is a conflict resolution that involves both parties giving in a
little, so the activity that was interrupted by the conflict can resume. Although a
compromise is a widely accepted way to resolve a conflict, few people are actually willing
to compromise. That’s because they have to give something up.
Integration: The focus of conflict resolution in the Mary Parker Follett Contribution to
Management lies in the integration of two problems. In this solution, neither of the
parties has to give anything up and both their interests are served. Integration leads to
something new being started, something that can lead to innovation and to which new
values can be added. Integration and collaboration lead to better techniques and a higher
level of business intelligence.
Types of leadership
1. Positional leadership: Positional leadership refers to the manager taking on
an authoritarian attitude that is expected of his position.
2. Personality leadership: Personality leadership refers to a person becoming
a leader as a result of it being in his nature, a powerful personality.
Compared to positional leaders, born leaders find it even easier to lead.
3. Functional leadership: Functional leadership is a form of leadership in
modern organisations. It has to do with the fact that in certain situations,
different people can take the lead. The one who is best qualified for a
specific action, or the one who has the right knowledge will take the lead in
that case.
Principles of coordination
Principle of early stage: Coordination should be started in the early
stages of planning and policy making. Heads of departments should
frame the policies with consulting other persons concerned.
Therefore, achieving coordination in the initial stages of planning and
policy making is necessary.
Principle of continuity: coordination is a continuous process. It is a
never ending process which must go on all the time in the
organization. So management should make constant efforts to achieve
co-ordination.
Principle of direct contact: Different departments should be
communicate with each other directly (Cross functioning) rather than
Principle of reciprocal relations: No department can work in isolation from the
other departments. That is, when purchase department works with sales
department, which in turn works with finance department and personnel
department, each of the four departments finds itself influenced by the other
department in the total situation. Similarly, in a group every person influences all
others and is in turn influenced by others. When reciprocal relationships are
maintained cordially, adequate coordination can be secured in an enterprise.
Chester Bernad
Chester Barnard published his famous book ‘The Functions of the Executive in
1938. The book provided a base for the formation and development of various
management theories.
In his book, Chester explains a comprehensive theory of behavior in formal
organizations that pivots around cooperation.
He underlines that people in executive roles must foster a sense of purpose,
moral codes, ethical visions and create formal and informal communication
systems.
According to Chester, people should cooperate. There is no place for conflicts
among workers
He divided organisation into formal and informal
Social system Approach
• Bernad’s Acceptance Theory of Authority
• The acceptance theory of authority states that a manager's authority
over his/her subordinates depends on the willingness of the
subordinates to accept his/her right to give orders and comply with
them.
Herbert Simon
Herbert Simon found out that classical organizational theories are
inapplicable to several administrative situations facing managers.
Herbert tried to apply classical theories to current situations of his time, but
they didn’t fit. He also contradicted Henri Fayol’s work in management,
proving them to be mere proverbs of administrations rather than principles.
• Contributions
Organization Concept: According to him organization is a complex network of
decision process. He viewed organizations as the decision making structures.
Decision Making: He viewed that management itself is decision making.
According to him decision making consists of three stages:
1. Intelligence Phase-Searching
2. Design Phase-Inventing, developing and analyzing possible course of
action
3. Choice Phase-Actual selection
• Bounded Rationality
He has advocated the principle of bounded rationality.
According to him, managers are in search of optimal solutions but are
satisfied with good enough solutions.
Managers are not able to maximize on account of various types of
Administrative man:
It is a model of decision making.
Administrative man adopts sacrificing approach rather than maximizing
approach of economic man.
They do not have the full information about the problem They do not have
knowledge of all the possible alternative solutions to the problem and their
outcomes
They do not have abilities to process competitive environment and technical
information.
Administrative man fall under bounded rationality
Some other thinkers in Neo-Classical
Management
1. Maslow- Need Hierarchy theory
2. Federick HerzBerg- Two factor Theory (Based on Job enrichment)
3. Douglus Macgregor
Theory X and Theory Y
Book: The human side of Enterprise
4. Renis Likert
Imagine a company as a big machine with many gears. If one gear stops
working well, it can affect the whole machine. Similarly, if one part of a
company isn't functioning properly, it can impact the entire organization's
success.
With the systems approach, managers try to understand how changes in one area
can ripple through the whole organization. They also consider how different parts
of the organization depend on each other. This helps them make better decisions
and solve problems in a way that benefits the entire company.
Instead, many internal and external factors have an impact on the management
strategy that’s ultimately chosen.
Leaders who utilize this theory do not adopt a single management style and
instead must identify and use different styles for different situations.
As a result, these leaders also develop additional traits and skills that ensure
they can employ various management approaches effectively.
The use of diverse styles can help make these leaders more flexible and
adaptable in the workplace.
This modern theory of organization believes that there are three things at play
when figuring out A management strategy: the size of an organization, the
technology it uses and the leadership style.
Schools of Management Thought
Schools of management thought are theoretical frameworks for the study of
management that are based on different assumptions about human beings and
the organizations for which they work