21KP5A0507

IMAGE FORGERY
DETECTION USING
DEEP LEARNING
M.BHARATH GUIDE:
21KP5A0507 CH.BINDHU MADHAVI MAM
ABSTRACT
• Image forgery detection using deep learning is a technique that utilizes artificial neural
networks to identify whether an image has been morphed or manipulated. This is an
important task in the digital age, as the proliferation of easily accessible photo editing
software has made it easy for individuals to alter images for various purposes, such as
spreading misinformation or altering evidence. Deep learning algorithms work by
training on large datasets of images and learning to recognize patterns and features that
are indicative of forgery.
INTRODUCTION
• This project embarks on the critical task of detecting image forgeries, employing the
sophisticated "Xception“ and “DenseNet121” models as its cornerstone. In the digital
age, where visual content can be easily manipulated, ensuring the authenticity of images
has become paramount. Our methodologies harnesses deep learning techniques to discern
the genuineness of images, scrutinizing them for any alterations or manipulations. Our
approach is, where we meticulously train and utilize the models, renowned for its
exceptional performance in image classification tasks, to predict the integrity of images.
Through this endeavor, we aim to fortify the trustworthiness of digital imagery, making
significant strides in the domain of digital forensics.
EXISTING SYSTEM
• The existing system for image forgery detection using deep learning, as detailed in the comprehensive
study, employs several advanced techniques to identify manipulated images. Deep learning algorithms,
particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs), play a
pivotal role in analyzing images for forgery signs. These methods are capable of learning and recognizing
intricate patterns that indicate manipulation, such as alterations in spatial or frequency domains. One
notable approach involves training CNNs on datasets comprising both authentic and forged images,
enabling these networks to distinguish new images as genuine or forged based on learned features.
Similarly, GANs, with their dual-network architecture, further enhance detection capabilities by generating
synthetic images for comparison and classification, thereby identifying forgery with high precision.
Additionally, hybrid methods combining CNNs and GANs exploit both spatial and frequency domain
alterations for even more accurate detection.
DISADVANTAGES
• The proposed system in the paper on deep learning for image forgery detection showcases
promising results but faces notable disadvantages. Firstly, the requirement for extensive
datasets of genuine and forged images for training poses a significant challenge, given the
difficulty in acquiring a large volume of forged images intended for deceptive purposes.
Moreover, the susceptibility of deep learning algorithms to sophisticated forgeries through
adversarial attacks is a critical vulnerability. These attacks involve the creation of forgeries
designed explicitly to deceive the algorithm, highlighting a gap in the detection capabilities
of current models. Despite these challenges, the ongoing research and development in this
field hold potential for advancing the accuracy and reliability of image forgery detection.
PROPOSED SYSTEM
• The proposed system for "Image Forgery Detection " leverages advanced deep learning techniques to
identify and analyze digital image manipulations, offering a robust solution in the realm of digital forensics.
Beginning with the import of essential libraries for data handling and image processing, the system
introduces a custom Error Level Analysis (ELA) function to highlight discrepancies indicative of tampering
in digital images. It meticulously organizes and processes a dataset of pristine and altered images, utilizing
the ELA method to prepare the data for optimal deep learning model performance. Employing the deep
learning models, known for its efficiency and accuracy in handling complex image data, the system enhances
its capability with custom layers and training procedures tailored to identify subtle signs of forgery. Through
meticulous training and evaluation phases, including split data validation and the application of various
performance metrics, this architecture aims to set a new standard in the accuracy and reliability of automated
image forgery detection, representing a significant advancement in securing digital media authenticity.
ADVANTAGES
• High Accuracy and Efficiency: Utilizing the Xception, DenseNet121 architecture, known for its depth and separable
convolutions, the system is designed to achieve high accuracy in detecting forgeries by learning complex and subtle
patterns in images that are indicative of tampering.
• Advanced Preprocessing with ELA: The implementation of Error Level Analysis (ELA) as a preprocessing step
enhances the model's ability to highlight areas of potential tampering by exposing differences in compression levels.
This innovative approach significantly improves the detection of forgeries by focusing the model's attention on
discrepancies that are otherwise difficult to discern.
• Versatility and Scalability: The architecture is versatile and scalable, capable of adapting to various datasets and
evolving to recognize new types of image manipulations as forgery techniques become more sophisticated.
• Automated and Time-Efficient: By automating the detection process, the system offers a time-efficient solution for
analyzing large volumes of images, reducing the manual effort required in traditional forensic analysis and allowing for
rapid screening and identification of tampered images.
ARCHITECTURE
OF THE
PROJECT
ALGORITHM
• # Step 1: Import Libraries
import necessary_libraries
• # Step 2: Define ELA Function
def ela_function(image_path):
• # Implement ELA
return processed_image
• # Step 3: Dataset Preparation

original_images, tampered_images = load_and_preprocess_dataset()
• # Step 4: Data Preprocessing
x_train, x_val, y_train, y_val = split_and_preprocess_data(original_images, tampered_images)

• # Step 5: Model Definition
model = define_xception_model()
• # Step 6: Model Training
model.train(x_train, y_train, validation_data=(x_val, y_val))

• # Step 7: Model Evaluation
evaluate_model(model, x_val, y_val)

• # Step 8: Post-processing and Analysis
analyze_results()

21KP5A0507

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

21KP5A0507

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

21KP5A0507

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IMAGE FORGERY

• # Step 1: Import Libraries

• # Step 3: Dataset Preparation

x_train, x_val, y_train, y_val = split_and_preprocess_data(original_images, tampered_images)

model.train(x_train, y_train, validation_data=(x_val, y_val))

evaluate_model(model, x_val, y_val)

You might also like