Midterm Module 6

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 67

THE ORIGINS

OF
THE ORIGINS OF

Chewing ,licking and sucking are extremely widespread


mammalian activities, which , in terms of causal
observation , have obvious similarities with speech.

-MacNeilage(1998)
THE ORIGINS OF

TRUE OR FALSE
Humans and animals produce
sounds which is located in an
ancient part of the brain.
THE ORIGINS OF

TRUE
THE ORIGINS OF

• Ability to produce sounds is


located in an ancient part of the
brain which we share with all
vertebrates (fish, frogs, birds,
mammals)
THE ORIGINS OF

• Spoken language probably developed


between 100 000 and 50 000 years ago
while writing only dates back to about
5 000 years ago
 no direct evidence about the
development of speech
THE ORIGINS OF

• A lot of speculation about the


origins of language, but little
known about the topic
little physical evidence on
language our ancestors used
THE ORIGINS OF

TRUE OR FALSE
Languages originated from a
single source and are thus
monogenetic theories of
language origin
THE ORIGINS OF

FALSE
THE ORIGINS OF

Where do you think


language
comes from?
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF

The Divine Source


THE ORIGINS OF

• In most religions, a divine source gives


language to the humans
• Nearly all divine theories believe that
languages originated from a single
source and are thus monogenetic
theories of language origin
THE ORIGINS OF

• Over the ages, people carried


out experiments to rediscover
this original, God-given
language
THE ORIGINS OF

TRUE OR FALSE
If human infants grow up in
isolation, they will automatically
begin to use the original God-
given language.
THE ORIGINS OF

FALSE
THE ORIGINS OF

-Egyptian Pharaoh-Psammetichus
-experiment-two new born babies -2,500 years ago

Phrygian word
“bekos”-bread
BEKOS
Be
bed
THE ORIGINS OF

Psammetichus (Egyptian pharaoh) let two newborn


babies grow up in the company of only goats and a
mute shepherd 2 500 years ago
– they are reported to have started saying the
Phrygian (Turkey) word ‘bekos’ (bread) = original
language?
– however, it is more likely that the children imitated
the sounds they heard the goats make
THE ORIGINS OF

King James of Scotland carried out similar


experiment around 1 500
– the children are reported to have started
speaking

Hebrew = original language?


THE ORIGINS OF

BUT: Children discovered


living in isolation do not
confirm these findings but
grow up with no language at
all
THE ORIGINS OF

• Criticism: Divine source is


impossible to prove/disprove
and the ‘first language’ is
impossible to reconstruct!!
THE ORIGINS OF

• Plato argues that a legislator gave


the correct, natural names to all
things
• In many religions, only “special”
languages may be used in prayers
and rituals
THE ORIGINS OF

Imitations of natural sound


which early men and
women heard around them
THE ORIGINS OF

Natural Sound
Source
THE ORIGINS OF

The Natural Sound Source


-primitive words Coo-coo-cuckoo
could have been
imitations of Splash
natural sound Bang
which early men Boom
and women Rattle
heard around Buzz
them Hiss
-Bow-wow
theory
THE ORIGINS OF

-The imitations of sounds were then used to


refer to the things associated with the relevant
sound (onomatopoeia still exist in our
language today: splash, rattle, boom, ...!)
• For example, when a bird flew by making the
sound ‘coo-coo’, it would be called ‘cuckoo’.
• Criticism?
THE ORIGINS OF

Criticism: how would soundless things


and abstract concepts have been referred
to??

Criticism: Language is more than only a


set of names
THE ORIGINS OF

Original sounds may have started as


natural cries of emotion such as pain,
anger and joy (pooh-pooh theory)

• Criticism?
THE ORIGINS OF

Original sounds may have


started as natural cries of
emotion such as pain, anger
and joy
THE ORIGINS OF

pooh-pooh
theory
THE ORIGINS OF

Criticism: these are produced with sudden


intakes of breath, which is not the case for
ordinary speech!! emotional reactions
contain sounds not otherwise used in speech
production
THE ORIGINS OF

The Social Interaction Source


THE ORIGINS OF

1. yo-he-ho
Language arose out of the
rhythmical grunts of people
working together, involved in
physical effort that has to be
coordinated
THE ORIGINS OF

yo-he-ho
THE ORIGINS OF

1. yo-he-ho
• Language arose out of the
rhythmical grunts of people working
together, involved in physical effort
that has to be coordinated (yo-he-ho
THE ORIGINS OF

• Early humans may have developed a set of grunts,


groans and curses used when lifting and carrying
trees/mammoths
• Makes sense as early humans must have lived in
groups, which require some form of organization and
hence communication to maintain
 development of language placed in a social context
THE ORIGINS OF

Criticism: apes and other


primates also live in groups
and use grunts etc without
having developed the capacity
for speech!!
THE ORIGINS OF

Language originated from


song as an expressive
rather than a
communicative need
THE ORIGINS OF

la-la
THE ORIGINS OF

2. la-la
• Language originated from song as an
expressive rather than a communicative
need
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF

The physical adaptation source


Early ancestors
THE ORIGINS OF

Homo erectus (from Africa to


Europe & Asia) – originated 1.8
million years ago – extinct 0.5
million years ago
– hunter-gatherer – tool-making
– able to control fire
– brain size increased
– not capable of producing sounds of
complexity comparable to modern
speech
THE ORIGINS OF

Homo Neanderthalensis
– Brain size increased
– average 1412 c.c. (homo sapiens;
1487 c.c.)
– consonant-like sound
distinctions
– 35 000 years ago
– features emerge that resemble
homo sapiens
THE ORIGINS OF

• Answer question by looking at physical features


that distinguish humans from other creatures
• Transition to upright posture & bipedal
locomotion => front limbs free
• Differences between skull of gorilla and
Neanderthal => Neanderthal may have been able to
produce some consonant-like sounds
THE ORIGINS OF

• Fossilised skeletal structures that begin to


resemble modern humans => partial adaptations
that appear relevant for speech => features are more
streamlined compared to other primates

• Features themselves may not have triggered


speech but give good indication that the creatures
possessing them were capable of speech
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF

Physical features that distinguish humans from other


creatures may have supported speech production
• Evolutionary development resulted in partial
adaptations making speech possible for early humans:
– Teeth
– Lips
– Mouth
– Tongue
– Larynx
– Pharynx
THE ORIGINS OF

TEETH
• Upright position, not slanting outwards like those of apes
• Roughly even in height
• Good for grinding and chewing
• Very helpful in making sounds such as ‘f ’ or ‘v’
THE ORIGINS OF

LIPS
• More intricate muscle
interlacing
• More flexible
• Capable of a wider range of
shapes
• Suitable for making sounds
such as ‘p’ or ‘b’
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF

MOUTH AND TONGUE


• Relatively small mouth compared to
other primates: can be opened and
closed more rapidly
• Smaller, thicker and more muscular
tongue that can be used to shape a
wide variety of sounds
• Airway through the nose can be
closed off to create more air pressure
in the mouth
THE ORIGINS OF

LARYNX AND PHARYNX


• Larynx is “voice box” in
your throat containing the
vocal folds or vocal chords
• Due to upright position,
head moved directly above
the spinal column and
larynx dropped to a lower
position
THE ORIGINS OF

• As a result, the pharynx


(cavity above the vocal
folds, acts as resonator)
became longer
increased range and
clarity of sounds
THE ORIGINS OF

• Disadvantage: due to lower


position of pharynx, humans
may choke more easily on
food
ability to speak must have
outweighed this
disadvantage for humans
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF
THE ORIGINS OF

Criticism: Certain birds and


parrots are able to also produce a
wide variety of sounds
THE ORIGINS OF

The Tool Making Source


THE ORIGINS OF

1. hands
• Humans started making tools and manipulating objects
using both hands

• Manual gestures may have been a precursor of language: oral


gesture theory

• Bringing words together like bringing two rocks together to


make a tool
THE ORIGINS OF

2.brain
• The functions for object manipulation and for speaking are very
close to each other in the left hemisphere of the brain
(lateralization)
 there may have been an evolutionary connection between the
use of tools and the use of language in early humans
• This theory allows for structural organization inherent to all
language (even sign languages), not only articulation of sounds to
denote objects
THE ORIGINS OF

The Genetic Source


THE ORIGINS OF

• Young babies go through developments: small brain, larynx


higher in throat => changes take place => Almost automatic set
of development

• Even children who are born deaf become fluent speakers of a


sign language claim that human offspring are born with a special
capacity for language (innateness theory)

• Capacity for language genetically hard-wired into newborn


humans?
THE ORIGINS OF

• This applies to all language in general, not one


specific language
• Crucial mutation in human genetics, special
“language gene” that only humans possess
• This would mean that language did not result
from a gradual change but happened rather quickly
as a crucial genetic mutation (unlike physical
adaptation, for example)
THE ORIGINS OF

• No certainty when this genetic change


might have taken place and how it may
relate to physical adaptation
• If we have a special gene for language, can
other creatures also learn language?
THE ORIGINS OF

You might also like