Chapter 4 The Fundamental Principles of Ethics

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

BA 300

CSR, ETHICS & GOOD


GOVERNANCE

CHAPTER 4: THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF


ETHICS
Objectives

At the end of this chapter, the students are expected to:


• understand the nature of human acts
• differentiate human acts from acts of man
• explain the different components of the human acts
• investigate critically the concept of voluntariness of
human act in relation to the agent’s culpability
Introduction
• Ethics is a science that investigates the nature of the
human conduct.

• In the process of investigation, it is important that we


differentiate between the human act and the act of man.

• The distinction between these two is an important


process in the determination of the morality of man’s
actions.

• These fundamental concepts are necessary because


they serve as guides in our evaluation and judgement of
the morality of human conduct.
The Nature of the Human Act

Human acts are sanctions that proceed from the deliberate free
will of man. These actions are therefore done with knowledge
and consent and willfully carried out by the person.

Characteristic of Human Acts


1. The free and voluntary acts of man.
2. Acts done with knowledge and consent.
3. Acts which are proper to man as a rational being since man
has been gifted with rationality and freedom of will.
4. Acts which are conscious and under our control and for
which we are responsible.
The Nature of the Human Act

Categories of acts of man

1. Natural involuntary actions – these are actions of man


that are performed intuitively or involuntary, e.g., blinking
the eyes, metabolism, perspiration, beating of the heart.

2. Natural voluntary actions – these are actions that are


within the control of man’s will but only for some period of
time, e.g., breathing, sleeping, eating, walking.
The Nature of the Human Act

Human Acts in Relation to Reason

• Good acts those done by man in harmony with the dictates


of right reason.

• Evil acts are those actions done by man in contradiction to


the dictates of right reason.

• Indifferent acts are those acts that are neither good or evil.
The Nature of the Human Act

The Voluntariness of the Human Acts

• Voluntary acts have moral bearings. This is because human


acts are performed by man with knowledge and consent.
Therefore he/she is responsible for his/her actions.

• Categories of Voluntary Actions


a. Perfect voluntariness – actions performed with full
knowledge and with full consent.
b. Imperfect Voluntariness – actions that occur when there is
no perfect knowledge or consent, or when either or both
of the knowledge or consent is partial.
c. Direct voluntary – actions that are intended for own sake,
either as a means or as an end, e.g., murder, stealing
The Nature of the Human Act

d. Indirect voluntary – actions that are not intended for its


own sake by which merely follows as a regrettable
consequences of an action, e.g., bombing an enemy’s
hideout that leads to killing of non combatants within an
area.
The Moral Principles Involved in Actions
Having Two Effects
• Is it morally right to do an act which entails good as well as
bad consequences?

• The answer is “YES” provided one follows the following


conditions (Panizo, 1964)
- The actions must be morally good in itself, or at least morally
indifferent.
- The good effect of the act must precede the evil effect. The
evil effect is morally allowed to happen as a regrettable
consequences.
- There must be a grave or sufficient reason in doing the act.
- The evil effect should not outweigh the good effect or, at
least the good effect should be equivalent in importance to
the evil effect
The Determinants of Morality

1. The End of the Action – refers to the natural purpose of an act


or that in which the act in its very nature terminates or results,
thus, the end of the action of studying is learning.

2. The End of the Actor – this refers to the intention or the motive
of the doer of the act. This is to be distinguished from the end
of the action. The motive of the agent varies with different
individuals , while the end of an act is always the same.

3. Circumstances of the Act – refer to the conditions that affect


the human act by increasing or decreasing the responsibility of
the actor. These circumstances of the act are not considered
part of the action itself which means acts per se can exist even
without the circumstances.
The Principles Involved in the
Circumstances of the Action
1. An indifferent act can become good or evil through
circumstances, e.g., eating meat is indifferent. However,
eating meat on Good Friday intentionally is evil.

2. A good act can become evil through circumstances, e.g.,


giving money to the poor people is good action. However,
giving money to the same poor people to buy votes during
elections is evil.

3. An intrinsically good act can become better or an


intrinsically evil act can become worse through
circumstances, e.g., visiting a sick person to comfort him is
good action. However, not visiting a mother who is sick in
the hospital out of hatred is worse.
The Principles Involved in the
Circumstances of the Action
4. An evil act can never become good through circumstances,
e.g., stealing money to buy food cannot make the action of
stealing good.

5. A good act done with evil means destroys the entire


objective goodness of the act, e.g., giving food to the
hungry is a good action. However, giving money to the
hungry through robbery is evil.
ACTIVITY NO. 4

Case for Analysis

Title: Mr. Kim

You might also like