9 - TAT 25092023 105927am

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

TAT

Ms. Afia Najmi


TAT: Description and
Administration

 A set of 31 somewhat
ambiguous black-and white
illustrations
 Up to 20 cards are selected for
presentation, based on client’s
age and gender
 Client is instructed to create a
story that describes:
 What are they doing?
 What happened before?
 What are they thinking and
feeling?
 What will be the outcome?
 Client’s stories are recorded
verbatim
TAT: Strengths

 Richness of personality
description
 Reflects current concerns
 Describes interpersonal
issues, patterns,
motivations
 Taps unconscious material
TAT: Limitations

 Questionable reliability
and validity
 No standardization
 Multiple scoring systems
 Time-consuming
 Relies on clinical intuition
 Little known cross-
culturally
TAT Stories: Some
Assumptions

 Storyteller ordinarily identifies


with a person in the story.
 The storyteller’s dispositions,
strivings and conflicts are
sometimes represented
symbolically.
 All stories are not of equal
importance.
 Themes that arise directly out
of card are less significant
than those which are more
indirect.
 Recurrent themes are most
important.
TAT Interpretation

 Multiple scoring systems, none


standard (Murray’s is too
cumbersome)
 Interpretation relies on clinical
skill and intuition of the tester.
 Considerations:
 Do stories coincide with typical
themes?
 Conformity with instructions
 Repetition/intensity of themes
 Sequence of themes
(perseveration)
 Psychodynamic content
 Conflicts
TAT: Lilienfeld et al
Critique

 Different stimulus sets


limit generalizability
 Multiple scoring systems
 Limited incremental
validity
 Validity results from
different systems are
equivocal
 No norms available
 It doesn’t matter:
clinicians use intuitive
systems anyway
Important & Useful Cards

 Card 1: very useful card


and we administered on
each client come to us.
 Tapped: Self Image,
Achievement, Sexual
problems, Autonomy Vs
Compliance conflict, denial
or repression of sexual
impulses
Card 2

Interpersonal relationship
card
Tapped: need for
achievement, denial of
sexual impulses, OCD
trends
Card 3BM

 Depression card
 Tapped: suicidal ideation
& attempts, aggressive
impulses, denial or
repression of aggressive
impulses. Need for
succurance
Card 4

 Contemporary figure
relationship card
 Tapped: triangular
jealousy, need for sex &
affection. Conflict of
affection vr rejection
Card 5

 Suspiciousness card
 Tapped: paranoid
thinking, OCD trends
6BM

 Male(father) authority
figure relationship card
7GF

 Female(Mother) authority
figure relationship card
8BM

 Aggression card
 Tapped: need for
aggression, achievement.
 Fantasy, distancing
defense mechanisms
12M

 Therapist and client


relationship card
13MF

 Opposite gender sexual


relationship card
 Tapped: need for sex,
affiliation, affection,
aggression. Conflict of
affiliation vs aggression,
OCD trends, guilt, denial
of sexual impulses
Card 15

 Guilt card
18BM

 Homosexual &
heterosexual card
Main points in scoring

 Needs
 Presses
 Self Image
 Inner State
 Conflicts
 Defense Mechanisms
 Environment
 Conflicts: Between two
needs, between need and
press

 Defense Mechanisms:
In order to overcome
conflict and anxiety client
use defense mechanism
as a tool

You might also like