Untitled Presentation
Untitled Presentation
Untitled Presentation
1.
Good Housekeeping: best practice to eliminate, or minimise, pollutants being generated and allowed into the environment.
Source Controls: methods of dealing with runoff at source, e.g. permeable paving, filter strips, or roadside filter trenches.
Site Controls: local controls that deal with generally smaller catchment areas, e.g. detention basins.
Regional Controls farger components that might typically deal with larger catchments and upstream site controls, e.g. stormwater
wetlands and retention ponds
Presentation Outlines
1. Introduction
2. SUDS
3. Water cycle
4. Environmental effects of urban
drainage
5. SUDs Triangle
6. Source control & Prevention
7. Conclusions
2
Sustainable Drainage
A concept that focuses on the environment and people.
• Considers:
1. Quantity of runoff
2. Quality of runoff
Sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) are a natural approach to managing drainage in and around properties an
other developments. SUDS work by slowing and holding back the water that runs off from a site, allowing natural
processes to break down pollutants.
1. SUDS
• Attenuate flow
• Promote infiltration & groundwater recharge
Why are SUDS needed?
• 11% of Scottish river length is classified as
polluted due to contamination from urban drainage
Covers:
Land-use
Wildlife habitats
Land-values
Water-resources
Other factors:
Opportunity costs
2. Flooding
4.Habitat
1.Water quantity
2.Water quality
3.Amneity, Biodiversity
Present Legal Status
• Contributing to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts • Preventing/limiting pollution input into groundwater
Surface water-runoff in areas constructed, or construction sites operated, after 1st April 2006 must now be drained by a Sustainable Urban
Drainage System
• Individual function of local SUDS techniques beneficial - but design should be led by a holistic vision & approach
Combined integrated function - mimics the waterflows in the natural hydrological cycle:
• Surface Flow
• Infiltration
• Storage in water-bodies
Interflow
Evapotranspiration
Tackling Contaminants
• Store water at various points in the catchment and allow water to be re-used, infiltrated, released
slowly and/or evaporated.
• These processes also allow the trapping of potential contaminants (e.g. metals,
PAHs/Hydrocarbons) within the treatment train.
⚫ Contaminants are typically adsorbed (physico-chemically bonded) to sediment particles that are
entrained in flow.
• As water speed is slowed down using SUDS, particles (and therefore contaminants) settle out.
Contaminant Sources: Vehicles
• 15-fold increase in the number of car and taxi miles covered over the last 50 years!
Design-Site Constraints
Physical site constraints can make construction difficult or impossible, and maintenance expensive if not addressed
adequately. Factors to consider include:
• Social constraints include issues of health and safety, aesthetics and impacts on recreational facilities. Factors to
consider include
• odour problems
⚫ visual impacts
⚫ noise
Not only can a poorly maintained SUDS technique function ineffectively, it can become a source of pollution or flood hazard itself.
easy and safe to maintain and operate ⚫ extent of maintenance - ensure the maintenance requirements are within the operator's capability
⚫ access to the treatment site - consider the ease of site access, when reviewing the treatment's maintenance requirements
⚫ frequency of maintenance - ensure that resources are available to carry out maintenance at the required frequency
⚫ debris and pollutant clearing - during clearing, the treatment should not require direct human contact with debris and trapped pollutants
(automated clearing options are preferred)
disposal - consider the disposal requirements of any waste from the treatment process.
Case Study: J4M8