Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 236 views

    Biometrik2 Week3a

    Uploaded by

    -
    An experiment was conducted to determine the optimal blanching time for papaya before being soaked in sucrose solution. Six blanching times were tested: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 minutes. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in treatments. The 3 minute blanching time produced the best results and was significantly different than other treatments, while the 18 minute time produced the worst results and was significantly different than other treatments. In conclusion, shorter blanching times produced better quality papaya.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Biometrik2 Week3a

    Uploaded by

    -
    236 views27 pages
    An experiment was conducted to determine the optimal blanching time for papaya before being soaked in sucrose solution. Six blanching times were tested: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 minutes. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in treatments. The 3 minute blanching time produced the best results and was significantly different than other treatments, while the 18 minute time produced the worst results and was significantly different than other treatments. In conclusion, shorter blanching times produced better quality papaya.

    Original Title

    Biometrik2-week3a

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    An experiment was conducted to determine the optimal blanching time for papaya before being soaked in sucrose solution. Six blanching times were tested: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 minutes. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in treatments. The 3 minute blanching time produced the best results and was significantly different than other treatments, while the 18 minute time produced the worst results and was significantly different than other treatments. In conclusion, shorter blanching times produced better quality papaya.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    236 views27 pages

    Biometrik2 Week3a

    Uploaded by

    -
    An experiment was conducted to determine the optimal blanching time for papaya before being soaked in sucrose solution. Six blanching times were tested: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 minutes. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in treatments. The 3 minute blanching time produced the best results and was significantly different than other treatments, while the 18 minute time produced the worst results and was significantly different than other treatments. In conclusion, shorter blanching times produced better quality papaya.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 27

    Experimental Design

    An Experimental Design is a plan for the assignment

    of the treatments to the plots in the experiment Designs differ primarily in the way the plots are grouped before the treatments are applied
    How much restriction is imposed on the random assignment of treatments to the plots
    A C B B D A D B D A C C A C B B D A D B D C A C

    Why do I need a design?


    To provide an estimate of experimental error
    To increase precision (blocking) To provide information needed to perform tests of

    significance and construct interval estimates To facilitate the application of treatments particularly cultural operations

    Factors to be Considered

    Physical and topographic features Soil variability Number and nature of treatments The crop Duration of the experiment Machinery to be used Size of the difference to be detected Significance level to be used Experimental resources Cost (money, time, personnel)

    Cardinal Rule:
    Choose the simplest experimental design that will give the required precision within the limits of the available resources

    Completely Randomized Design (CRD)


    Simplest and least restrictive Every plot is equally likely to be assigned to any

    treatment

    C
    B

    D
    A

    B
    D

    C
    C

    Advantages of a CRD
    Flexibility Any number of treatments and any number of replications Dont have to have the same number of replications per treatment (but more efficient if you do)
    Simple statistical analysis Even if you have unequal replication

    Missing plots do not complicate the analysis


    Maximum error degrees of freedom

    Disadvantage of CRD
    Low precision if the plots are not uniform

    A
    C B

    B
    D A

    D
    B D

    A
    C C

    Uses for the CRD


    If the experimental site is relatively uniform If a large fraction of the plots may not

    respond or may be lost If the number of plots is limited

    Design Construction
    No restriction on the assignment of treatments to the plots
    Each treatment is equally likely to be assigned to any plot Should use some sort of mechanical procedure to prevent

    personal bias Assignment of random numbers may be by:


    lot (draw a number ) computer assignment using a random number table

    Random Assignment by Lot


    We have an experiment to test three varieties: the

    top line from Oregon, Washington, and Idaho to find which grows best in our area ----- t=3, r=4

    A1
    A

    2
    A

    3 7
    A

    4 8

    1 12 6 5

    9 10 11 12

    Random Assignment by Table


    Select a starting point somewhere

    in a table of random numbers Moving up or down, left or right, write down the first n (12) three digit numbers you come to Rank the numbers from smallest to largest Assign the first treatment to the first r (4) numbers in sequence, etc.

    49416 97191 39100 53988 33423 81899 61547 17520 34502

    44448 53798 17217 71087 67453 07449 18707 95401 75508

    04269 12693 74073 84148 43269 37985 85498 55811 06059

    Tabel Bilangan Teracak


    14620 09724 95430 85125 12951 48477 81953 42783 17629 70473 19082 15232 73645 84146 09182 87729 73649 65584 56823 83641

    56919
    97310 07585

    17803
    78209 27040

    95781
    51263 26939

    85069
    52396 64531

    61594
    82681 70570

    94252
    72020 48392

    77489
    18895 06359

    62434
    84948 47040

    20965
    53072 05695

    20247
    74573 79799

    25950 82937 60819 59041 74208

    85189 16405 27364 37475 69516

    69374 81497 59081 03615 79530

    37904 20863 72635 84093 47649

    06759 94072 49180 49731 53046

    37950 09394 34800 36435 28187

    77387 59842 28055 75946 31824

    35495 39573 91570 85712 52265

    78192 51630 99154 06293 80494

    84518 78548 39603 85621 66428

    39412 48480 95318

    03642 50075 28749

    87497 11804 49512

    29735 24956 35408

    14308 72182 21814

    72094
    63158

    16385
    49753

    90185
    84279

    72635
    56496

    86259
    30618

    BILANGAN ACAK
    937 149 908 361 953 749 180

    URUTAN
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    PERINGKAT
    21 2 19 10 23 17 4

    PERLAKUAN
    A1 A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3

    951
    018 427 918 772 243 494 704 549 957 157 571 226 195 278 506 239

    8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

    22
    1 11 20 18 8 12 16 14 24 3 15 6 5 9 13 7

    B4
    C1 C2 C3 C4 D1 D2 D3 D4 E1 E2 E3 E4 F1 F2 F3 F4

    1
    C 5 F 9 F 13

    2
    A 6 E 10 A 14

    3
    F 7 F 11 C 15

    4
    B 8 D 12 D 16

    A1
    17 B 21 A 22 18

    D1
    19 C 23 B

    E
    20 A 24 B

    The CRD Analysis


    We can: Estimate the treatment means Estimate the standard error of a treatment mean Test the significance of differences among the treatment means

    RANCANGAN ACAK LENGKAP FULLY RANDOMIZED DESIGN UNGROUPED EXPERIMENT


    1 7
    13 19

    2 8
    14 20

    3 9
    15 21

    4 10
    16 22

    5 11
    17 23

    6 12
    18 24

    Hipotesis : Ho = t1 = t2 = t3 = t4 = t5=t6 H1 = t1 t2 t3 t4 t5t6 Fh F.05 = Berbeda nyata Fh F.05 = Berbeda Tidak nyata

    Jumlah Ulangan = (R-1) (T-1) 15

    PERCOBAAN RANCANGAN ACAK LENGKAP (PRAKTIKUM 1)


    PERLAKUAN A B C 43,1 42,3 41,1 ULANGAN 42,9 42,4 41,2 43,4 41,8 41,4 43,0 42,2 40,9 TOTAL RATA-RATA

    D
    E F TOTAL

    39,9
    37,2 37,0

    40
    38,2 36,8

    39,7
    38,6 37,4

    39,2
    37,7 36,5

    Contoh penelitian RAL


    Pengujian beberapa insektisida parasit dan telur serta hama

    penggerek (Triporyza incertulas Walker) telah dilakukan di Lab. Hama dan Penyakit tanaman Faperta Unpad Jatinangor. Ada enam insektisida yang dipakai: Dursban 20 EC, Reldan 24 EC, Lebaycid 550 EC, Trebon 10 EC, Curacron dan Diazinon 60 EC. Konsentrasi yang digunakan adalah 2cc/l. Respon yang diamati adalah persentase parasit telur penggerek yang menetas. Jelaskan kesimpulan penelitian tersebut !!!

    Perlakuan

    1 56,0
    54,4 41,2 49,5 59,1 35,7
    295,9

    2 48,2
    44,3 38,5 52,1 57,6 38,4
    279,1

    Total 208,6
    198,6 159,8 197,8 229,5 155,6
    954,1

    Rata 51,65
    49,05 39,95 49,45 57,38 38,90

    A
    B C D E F Total

    51,8 52,6
    49,5 50,4 35,4 44,7 50,4 45,8 60,2 52,6 40,2 41,3
    287,5 287,4

    CARA PERHITUNGAN:
    GT2 FK = ---------- = (954,1)2 : 24 =37929,45 Txr

    JK Total = ( Yij2 FK = + .. + .. + ... FK = . JK. Perl. = A.2+ .+ F2 FK = 4 JK Total = 562 +.+ 41,372 FK = JK Galat = JK total JK Perlakuan = KT = JK/db galat

    Tabel Sidik Ragam (ANOVA)


    Sumber Ragam DB JK KT Fh F.05

    Perlakuan

    18195

    3639

    271,56

    2,09

    Galat

    19

    255

    13,4

    Total

    24

    18450

    768,7

    RANCANGAN ACAK LENGKAP


    Untuk memperoleh manisan pepaya yang baik, sebelum
    direndam dalam larutan sukrosa harus dilakukan blansing terlebih dahulu dengan tujuan untuk menginaktifkan

    enzim-enzim. Masalahnya adalah berapa lama harus


    dilakukan blansing tersebut. Seorang peneliti telah melakukan percobaan dengan 6 waktu blansing, yaitu: 3,

    6, 9, 12, 15 dan 18 menit.

    Rancangan Acak Lengkap


    Perlakuan 1 2 Ulangan 3 4 Total Rata - rata

    A B C D E F Total

    43,1 42,3 41,1 39,9 37,2 37,0 240,6

    42,9 42,4 41,2 40,0 38,2 36,8 241,5

    43,4 41,8 41,4 39,7 38,6 37,4 242,3

    43,0 42,2 40,9 39,2 37,7 36,5 239,5

    172,4 168,7 164,6 158,8 151,7 147,7 963,9

    43,10 42,17 41,15 39,70 37,92 36,92

    Tabel Analisis Varians (ANOVA) RAL


    Sumber Variasi Perlakuan Galat Total 5 18 23 db Jumlah Kuadrat 117,42 2.36 119,78 Kuadrat Tengah 23,48 0,13 Hit 180,61** F 0,05 2,77 0,01 4,25

    Keterangan : * berarti berbeda nyata pada = 0,05

    Perhitungan Jumlah Kuadrat (JK)


    GT2 (963,9)2 FK = ---------- = ------------ = 38712,63 txr 6x4

    JK Total = ( Yij2 FK = 43,12 + + 37,72 + 36,52 FK = 119,78 43,12 + 36,922 JK. Perl. = ( Y, J2 FK = -------------------------- - FK = 117,42 4 JK Galat = JK total JK Perlakuan = 119,78-117,42 = 2,36
    UJI LANJUT: UJI BEDA RATA-RATA UJI LSD: - Fhit > Ftab - Harus ditetapkan pembanding (kontrol) Sd = (2(KT galat)/r = 2(0,13)/4=0,25 LSD = t/2, db galat x Sd = 2,10 x 0,25 = 0,53 UJI DUNCAN (LSR) LSR = SSR x Sx Sx = KT galat/r = 0,18 LSR = SSR x Sx

    P 2 SSR 2,97 LSR 0,53


    Rata2 Perlakuan F=36,92 a E=37,92 b D=39,70 c C=41,15 d B=42,17 e A=43,10 f

    3 4 5 6 3,12 3,21 3,27 3,32 0,56 0,57 0,58 0,60


    Beda dua rata-rata 1 2,78 4,23 5,25 6,18 1,78 3,23 4,25 5,18 1,45 2,47 3,40 1,02 1,95 0,93 LSD 0,53 0,53 0,56 0,57 0,59 0,60 LSR

    KESIMPULAN PENELITIAN
    Perlakuan A yaitu lamanya Blensing selama 3

    menit merupakan perlakuan yang paling baik dan berbeda nyata dengan perlakuan lainnya Perlakuan F yaitu lamnaya blensing selama 18 menit merupakan perlakuan yang paling jelek dan berbeda nyata dengan perlakuan lainnya Semakin pendek waktu blensing semakin baik kualitas pepaya.

    You might also like