The document outlines 8 different approaches to foreign language teaching:
1. The Silent Way focuses on learner independence and discovery with minimal teacher speaking.
2. The Natural Approach emphasizes comprehensible input and a relaxed environment.
3. CLIL integrates language learning with other subjects through real-life content and contexts.
4. The Grammar-Translation Method focuses on accuracy through translation and memorization.
5. The Lexical Approach organizes syllabi around lexical chunks for improved fluency.
6. Communicative Language Teaching prioritizes meaningful communication through information gaps and tasks.
7. Total Physical Response incorporates physical movement to stimulate memory and grammar induction.
8. Suggestopedia relies on
The document outlines 8 different approaches to foreign language teaching:
1. The Silent Way focuses on learner independence and discovery with minimal teacher speaking.
2. The Natural Approach emphasizes comprehensible input and a relaxed environment.
3. CLIL integrates language learning with other subjects through real-life content and contexts.
4. The Grammar-Translation Method focuses on accuracy through translation and memorization.
5. The Lexical Approach organizes syllabi around lexical chunks for improved fluency.
6. Communicative Language Teaching prioritizes meaningful communication through information gaps and tasks.
7. Total Physical Response incorporates physical movement to stimulate memory and grammar induction.
8. Suggestopedia relies on
The document outlines 8 different approaches to foreign language teaching:
1. The Silent Way focuses on learner independence and discovery with minimal teacher speaking.
2. The Natural Approach emphasizes comprehensible input and a relaxed environment.
3. CLIL integrates language learning with other subjects through real-life content and contexts.
4. The Grammar-Translation Method focuses on accuracy through translation and memorization.
5. The Lexical Approach organizes syllabi around lexical chunks for improved fluency.
6. Communicative Language Teaching prioritizes meaningful communication through information gaps and tasks.
7. Total Physical Response incorporates physical movement to stimulate memory and grammar induction.
8. Suggestopedia relies on
The document outlines 8 different approaches to foreign language teaching:
1. The Silent Way focuses on learner independence and discovery with minimal teacher speaking.
2. The Natural Approach emphasizes comprehensible input and a relaxed environment.
3. CLIL integrates language learning with other subjects through real-life content and contexts.
4. The Grammar-Translation Method focuses on accuracy through translation and memorization.
5. The Lexical Approach organizes syllabi around lexical chunks for improved fluency.
6. Communicative Language Teaching prioritizes meaningful communication through information gaps and tasks.
7. Total Physical Response incorporates physical movement to stimulate memory and grammar induction.
8. Suggestopedia relies on
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
Approaches to
Foreign Language Teaching
Approaches? Approaches • Grammar-Translation • Direct Method • Audiolingualism • Silent Way • Total Physical Response • Suggestopedia • Natural Approach • Communicative Language Teaching • Lexical Approach • CLIL Approach 1 C. Gattegno (1970s)
• Learners speak as much as possible
• Learners are encouraged to discover and create • Learning is facilitated by realia • Problem solving and critical thinking are essential • Teachers speak as little as possible Approach 1 Strengths Weaknesses • learners’ independence • tense atmosphere • learners’ responsibility • reluctance to experiment and • teamwork interact • experimenting with language • “absence” of the teacher and production Approach 2 S. Krashen & T. Terrell (1970s-1980s)
• Language acquisition is the essence
• Comprehensible input matters • Mistakes are ok • Less pressure, more enjoyment Approach 2 Strengths Weaknesses • Language is acquired in a natural • Accuracy is a bit underaddressed way • The approach may be less • Meaningful situations are effective for B1+ students employed • L1 is underrated • Engaging and motivating activities • Friendly environment Approach 3 D. Marsh, P. Van de Craen (1990s-2000s) • Language is a means of learning content • Natural use of language is seen in natural contexts • Language is used in real-life situations • Language is integrated into broader curriculum • Fluency is the key focus • Subject matters of other courses plays a part • Four Cs: content, communication, cognition, and culture Approach 3 Strengths Weaknesses • Interdisciplinary connections are • Curriculum revision and redesign established are needed • Language is used as a tool of • Teachers may be unprepared cognition and communication • Some content aspects are easier • Language is used in new to teach in L1 contexts and situations • Learner’s motivation increases Approach 4 • Used for teaching classical and/or dead languages • The key focus is learning for reading • Dictionary study, translation, and memorization matter • L1 is exceptionally important • Deduction comes to the fore • Teacher’s role is traditional Approach 4 Strengths Weaknesses • Students achieve top accuracy • The approach is exceptionally • Students read a lot teacher-centered • Students drill a lot of vocabulary • L1 is involved extensively and grammar structures • There is little to no oral • The process is well-organized interaction and simple • A lot of drilling is boring • Students compare L2 and L1 a lot Approach 5 M. Lewis (1990s) • Language consists of lexicalized grammar • Syllabi are organized around lexis • Language is learned not through isolated vocabulary units, but through chunks • Fluency is rated over accuracy • Learners’ autonomy is cherished • Language should be recycled over and over Approach 5 Strengths Weaknesses • Authentic language stretches are • Grammar is underemphasized acquired • The PPP paradigm is rejected • Thorough recycling of chunks is practiced • Learners’ independence is respected • Mistakes are not overemphasized • Visuals are used extensively Approach 6 Van Ek, Alexander, D. Hymes (1970s-1990s); J. Richards (2000s-2020s) • Communication aspects of language come to the fore • Information gap is the key driver of communication • Fluency is principal • Oral interaction matters a lot • Meaning, not form, is focused on • Activities need to contain meaningful tasks • Students’ needs are addressed • Student-talking time prevails over teacher-talking time Approach 6 Strengths Weaknesses • Real-life situations are modeled • Not all real-life activities work in • Oral interaction is practiced a lot the classroom • Learners’ needs are emphasized • Language and, therefore, • Language functions are addressed accuracy are underrated and practiced • Formal learning is underrated • Learners’ motivation increases • The teacher’s role might be • Informal learning happens a lot undermined • The approach is student-centered Approach 7 J. Asher (1960s) • Behaviorism is the foundation • Memory is stimulated with psychomotor associations • Grammar is taught inductively • Items from immediate surroundings are used • A lot of demonstration and repetition are involved Approach 7 Strengths Weaknesses • The learning process is clearly • B1+ students might not benefit paced and organized • The approach is teacher- • The bodily-kinesthetic centered intelligence is developed • Reception predominates over • Learners’ motivation increases production with the role reversal Approach 8 G. Lozanov (1970s) • The power of positive suggestion is in play • Positive attitude on all sides is important • Teaching is like attending a concert • Art and aesthetics are heavily relied on • Balance is vital • Rapport matters a lot Approach 8 Strengths Weaknesses • The atmosphere is exceptionally • The atmosphere can be a bit too positive relaxing • Both language systems and skills • Not everyone likes classical are involved music • Musical intelligence is developed • The learner is passive • The learner-teacher centeredness seems balanced