This document summarizes key points from Chapter 12 of Understanding Intercultural Communication Second Edition. It discusses three ethical positions for assessing intercultural communication: ethical absolutism, relativism, and universalism. Absolutism emphasizes universal moral standards regardless of culture, while relativism stresses understanding practices in their cultural contexts. Universalism derives inclusive standards through cross-cultural dialogue. The document also presents meta-ethics contextualism as a fourth position and discusses becoming flexible intercultural communicators through practices like parallel thinking and cultivating inner peace.
This document summarizes key points from Chapter 12 of Understanding Intercultural Communication Second Edition. It discusses three ethical positions for assessing intercultural communication: ethical absolutism, relativism, and universalism. Absolutism emphasizes universal moral standards regardless of culture, while relativism stresses understanding practices in their cultural contexts. Universalism derives inclusive standards through cross-cultural dialogue. The document also presents meta-ethics contextualism as a fourth position and discusses becoming flexible intercultural communicators through practices like parallel thinking and cultivating inner peace.
This document summarizes key points from Chapter 12 of Understanding Intercultural Communication Second Edition. It discusses three ethical positions for assessing intercultural communication: ethical absolutism, relativism, and universalism. Absolutism emphasizes universal moral standards regardless of culture, while relativism stresses understanding practices in their cultural contexts. Universalism derives inclusive standards through cross-cultural dialogue. The document also presents meta-ethics contextualism as a fourth position and discusses becoming flexible intercultural communicators through practices like parallel thinking and cultivating inner peace.
This document summarizes key points from Chapter 12 of Understanding Intercultural Communication Second Edition. It discusses three ethical positions for assessing intercultural communication: ethical absolutism, relativism, and universalism. Absolutism emphasizes universal moral standards regardless of culture, while relativism stresses understanding practices in their cultural contexts. Universalism derives inclusive standards through cross-cultural dialogue. The document also presents meta-ethics contextualism as a fourth position and discusses becoming flexible intercultural communicators through practices like parallel thinking and cultivating inner peace.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
Understanding Intercultural
Communication Second Edition
Chapter 12
How Can We Become Ethical Intercultural
Communicators?
Stella Ting-Toomey & Leeva C. Chung
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
PowerPoint Slides Designed by Alex Flecky and Noorie Baig
TODAY’S MENU I. Intercultural Communication Ethics: Contemporary Issues
II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
III. Becoming Ethical and Flexible
Intercultural Communicators I. Intercultural Communication Ethics: Contemporary Issues
Ethics: set of principles of conduct that
governs behavior of individuals and groups; a set of standards that uphold the community’s expectations concerning “right” and “wrong” conduct. II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Three ethical positions used to assess
ethical violations in diverse cultures: Complete my.blog 12.1 on p. 256. A. Ethical Absolutism Position B. Ethical Relativism Position C. Ethical Universalism Position II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
A. Ethical Absolutism Position • Emphasizes principles of right and wrong (good and bad behavior) in accordance with a set of assumed universally fixed standards regardless of cultural differences. • Universality: one set of consistent standards guides behavior on a global level; cultural context is minimized. The standards, however, are often reflective of dominant or power-holder cultural group. II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
B. Ethical Relativism Position
• Emphasizes the importance of understanding
cultural context and its underlying traditions, beliefs, and value patterns in judging conduct. • Relativists emphasize that ethical/unethical practices should be understood (but not necessarily agreed with) from cultural insiders’ viewpoint. II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
C. Ethical Universalism Position • Emphasizes importance of deriving inclusive universal ethical standards and then placing ethical judgments against these all- encompassing standards. • Judgments require knowledge about underlying similarities across cultures and about the unique features of a culture and involve collaborative dialogue, open attitudes, and hard work from all cultural/ethnic and marginalized groups and voices. II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards for all practices II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards Takes role of for all practices culture seriously II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards Takes role of Involves for all practices culture collaborative seriously dialog, open attitudes II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards Takes role of Involves for all practices culture collaborative seriously dialog, open attitudes Cons II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards Takes role of Involves for all practices culture collaborative seriously dialog, open attitudes Cons Culturally imposed perspective by dominant culture, and nondominant cultures are marginalized. II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards Takes role of Involves for all practices culture collaborative seriously dialog, open attitudes Cons Culturally Encourages too imposed much cultural perspective by flexibility, dominant may perpetuate culture, and intolerable nondominant cultural cultures are practices by marginalized being too culturally accepting II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
Ethical Ethical Ethical Absolutism Relativism Universalism Pros Fixed standards Takes role of Involves for all practices culture collaborative seriously dialog, open attitudes Cons Culturally Encourages too Requires hard imposed much cultural work from all; perspective by flexibility, most using this dominant may perpetuate position are culture, and intolerable “imposed nondominant cultural ethics,” relying cultures are practices by heavily on marginalized. being too Eurocentric culturally moral accepting philosophies II. Multiple Ethical Positions: Assessing
Pros and Cons
D. Meta-Ethics Contextualism Position: An Alternative 4th Position: Meta-ethics: ethical way of thinking that transcends particular ideologies; the application of ethics is understood only through systematic analysis of the multiple layers of the ethical dilemma • Strength: emphasizes fact-finding and layered interpretations, takes into serious consideration importance of culture, context, persons, etc. • Problem: time-consuming approach III. Becoming Ethical and Flexible Intercultural Communicators A meta-ethical decision is a discovery process—into our own values, inconsistencies—and prompts us to gather multiple-level information.
• Can you think of creative solutions other than
the ones investigated? • Is there a way to prevent similar ethical dilemmas or pressures from arising in the future in this culture? III. Becoming Ethical and Flexible Intercultural Communicators B. Becoming Flexible: Final Passport Do-Ables • Practice parallel thinking. • Responsibility for peace lies with each of us—starts with inner peace. • Dynamic flexibility: integrating knowledge, open-minded attitude, culture- sensitive skills, and communicating ethically with culturally dissimilar others. Final Parting Thoughts…
An intercultural life is a creative life that demands both
playfulness and mindfulness in transforming one’s intercultural journey into a discovery process. ~ Stella Ting-Toomey & Leeva Chung