Reference and Revision (Section 395-405 of CRPC)
Reference and Revision (Section 395-405 of CRPC)
Reference and Revision (Section 395-405 of CRPC)
Reference and revision under CrPC have been discussed in Chapter XXX from
sections 395 to 405. Section 395 and section 396 of the Criminal Procedure
Code deal with reference. And sections 397 to 405 discuss revision.
Section 395. Reference to High Court. (1) Where any Court is satisfied that a
case pending before it involves a question as to the validity of any Act,
..Ordinance or Regulation or of any provision contained in an Act, Ordinance or
Regulation, the determination of which is necessary for the disposal of the case, and is of
opinion that such Act, Ordinance, Regulation or provision is invalid or inoperative, but has
not been so declared by the High Court to which that Court is subordinate or by the
Supreme Court, the Court shall state a case setting out its opinion and the reasons
therefor, and refer the same for the decision of the High Court.
A reference arises when a case is before a trial court and such a case
includes a question relating to the validity of any regulation, ordinance or act
or any provision of the act, which is necessary for the determination of a
criminal case...Such an act, regulation or ordinance may be inoperative or
invalid but the Higher Court like Supreme Court or High Court has not
declared it
As such, the lower court or trial court shall refer to the High Court for its
cause or opinion. Such opinions or reasons may form the basis of the court’s
decision.
In such cases, the accused may be sent to the jail or released on the bail, as
there is pending of revert of opinion from the higher court.
Grounds for Reference under CrPC: Before sending a case for reference to
the High Court, the lower court shall satisfy itself that:
Then the lower court shall state its opinion and reason for the same and
refer the same to High Court for its decision.
Residuary Provision:
Section 395(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code states that the Court of
Session or Metropolitan Magistrate may refer for the decision of High Court
on any question of law arising in a case pending before it to which provision
of section 395(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code does not apply.
In Emperor vs Maula Fuzla Karim, the court held that reference under section
395(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code could be made only on a question of
law, not on a question of fact.
Procedure for Disposal of the Case:
Where a question has been referred to High Court, the High Court shall pass
order thereon.
The copies of such order shall be then sent to the lower court by whom
reference was made.
Such lower court shall then dispose of the case in the light of the reference
order given by the High Court.
According to section 395(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, when the case is
pending for reference in the High Court, the court may either commit the
accused to jail or release him on bail.
According to section 396(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court
may direct by whom the cost of reference will be paid.
Revision: Nowhere in Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, “Revision” has been
defined but in Section 397 of code, empowers the High Court or any Sessions
Court to call, examine the records of any proceeding.
They have the power to direct the execution of any sentence or suspend or
stay the lower court’s order during the pendency of revision or during the
examination of record. The court may also direct to release the accused on
bail by executing the bonds if the accused is in custody.
No Revision in Certain Orders: Revision is not maintainable against:
(a) orders which are appealable.
(b) Interlocutory order: The order which is temporary in nature and does
not determine the substantial rights and liabilities of the parties.
The Revisional Court (Court of Session, High Court) shall order Chief
Judicial Magistrate to inquire himself or through subordinate to make a
further inquiry regarding:
(a) dismissal of a complaint under section 203, 204(4) of the Criminal
Procedure Code.
(b) discharge of accused. Here, no order of further inquiry should be passed
without giving an opportunity to the accused to showcase why a further
inquiry should not be directed.
High Court also has the power that Court of Session has under section 307
of Criminal Procedure Code, that is, power to pardon.