Fabrication and Performance Analysis of PVA/PVC Composite Membrane To Remove Total Dissolved Solids From Liming/unhairing Wastewater
Fabrication and Performance Analysis of PVA/PVC Composite Membrane To Remove Total Dissolved Solids From Liming/unhairing Wastewater
Fabrication and Performance Analysis of PVA/PVC Composite Membrane To Remove Total Dissolved Solids From Liming/unhairing Wastewater
Presented By Supervised By
Md. Jubaer Hussain(1619055) Thuhin Kumar Dey
Md. Habibun Nabi(1619057) Assistant Professor
Dept. of Leather Engineering
PVA/PVC membranes are frequently employed in ultrafiltration, microfiltration, and membrane distillation due
to various benefits such as strong chemical resistance, well-controlled porosity, superior thermal stability, and
desirable mechanical qualities
6. The 1962 USPHS Drinking Water Standards (US. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare 1%2) specify that
the total dissolved solids should not exceed 500 mg/l if more suitable supplies are available. According to McKee
and Wolf (1%3), this limit was set primarily on the basis of taste threshold.
7. The most widely used procedures for determining TDS or filterable residue are given in Standard Methods
(American Public Health Association 1985). A drying temperature of 103°C is specified while several filtering
mechanisms are acceptable.
Aims & Objectives:
To Prepare a membrane from PVA/PVC composite for the treatment of Liming/Unhairing Waste
water
PVA/PVC composite
Then after drying in room temp. for polymer membrane was then Then, the excess water was
10 min the PVA/PVC membrane was immersed in Glutaraldehyde further evaporated in a
cut out with the help of a die solution(50% water content) vacuum oven for 15 hours
for crosslinking
Liming/Unhairing wastewater was collected from the SAF Leather Ltd. (Factory), Noapara, Jessore. It consisted of a mixture of
Unhairing and Liming Chemicals of Liming operations. It was considered as the raw sample.
Methodology
50.06
50
30
22.93
20
10 7.67
0
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pressure(kPa)
Fig: Pressure vs Percentage of removal
This graph represents that removal of TDS increasing with the increasing of pressure.
Effect of time for removal of TDS
Time vs Percentage of removal
60
50.06
50
Percentage of removal
41.12
40
30
22.93
20
10 7.67
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time(Sec)
Fig: Time vs Percentage of removal
This graph represents that removal of TDS increasing with respect to the increasing of
time
Effect of pH for removal of TDS
60
pH vs Percentage of removal
50.06 50.06
50
30
22.93
20
10 7.67
0
6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7 7.1 7.2 7.3
pH
Fig: pH vs Percentage of removal
This graph represents that removal of TDS increasing in the pH >6 and when reaches pH 7 it remains
constant and for pH 7.2, we got the same value of pH 7.
Conclusion:
1. The percentages of reduction 51.02% for TDS, 24.01% for salinity, 50.13% for BOD and 44.07% for COD,
which was satisfactory
[2] Joseph H. Sherrard, Donald R. Moore & Theo A. Dillaha (1987) Total Dissolved Solids: Determination, Sources, Effects,
and Removal, The Journal of Environmental Education, 18:2, 19-24, DOI: 10.1080/00958964.1987.9943484
[3]Chun-Chen Yanga, ∗, G.M. Wub, Study of microporous PVA/PVC composite polymer membrane and its application to MnO2
capacitors, Materials Chemistry and Physics 114 (2009) 948–955
[4] M. Cheryana, *, N. Rajagopalanb, Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction,
Journal of Membrane Science 151 (1998) 13-28
[5] Andreas A. Sapalidis, Porous Polyvinyl Alcohol Membranes: Preparation Methods and Applications, 5 June 2020
[6] Pikulthong Chaimongkol1 and Datchanee Pattavarakorn1*, Preparation of Poly (vinyl alcohol)/Poly (vinyl chloride)
Microporous Composite Polymer Membrane, TIChE International Conference 2011 November 10 – 11, 2011 at Hatyai,
Songkhla THAILAND
[7] P. Angelin Vinodhini and P. N. Sudha*, Removal of heavy metal chromium from tannery effluent using ultrafiltration
membrane, Vinodhini and Sudha Textiles and Clothing Sustainability (2016) 2:5
[8] Mahmoud Abdel-Shafy Elsheikh, Tannery wastewater pre-treatment, Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.2 | 2009
[9] Elorm Obotey Ezugbe * and Sudesh Rathilal, Membrane Technologies in Wastewater Treatment: A Review, 30 April 2020
[10] MANUELE MARCUCCI, INGRID CIABATTI, ALESSANDRO MATTEUCCI, AND GUIDO VERNAGLIONE,
Membrane Technologies Applied to Textile Wastewater Treatment, Tecnotessile S.r.l., via del Gelso 13, Prato, Italy
[11] Azile Nqombolo, Anele Mpupa, Richard M. Moutloali and Philiswa N. Nomngongo, Wastewater Treatment Using
Membrane Technology, Department of Applied Chemistry, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76624
Thank You