Contribution of Group Members: Student Names

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Contribution of group

members
Student Names-
Table of contents
• Introduction
• General group Interaction
• Team strength and weaknesses
• Challenges faced
• Lessons learned
• Improvement
• References
Introduction
• In this presentation, we are discussing about the team work. How people
work in team. This task is quite interesting for all of us.
• We will be discussing the strengths and weakness of our group members.
• We also talk about the challenges we faced while working as one team.
General Group Interaction
• We all make general discussions in which we all share our thoughts, experiences, beliefs, etc.
• We all discussed virtually as well as physically.
• We follow the communication process while interacting with each other.
• Communication process is as follow-
 Developing the Message.
 Encoding the Message.
 Selecting the Channel.
 Message Transmission.
 Decoding the Message.
 Feedback.
 Learning Effective Communication.
Team Strength and weaknesses

Strength Weakness
•Passionate for the work • Poor decision making
•Understand the needs of others • lack of communication
•Understand the emotion of others • Excessive connectivity.
•Excellent management skills • Stagnancy.
•Excellent Communication skills • Needing to be liked.
•Make decisions quickly • Hypocrisy.
•Able to motivate and inspire others to do their
• Failing to set clear expectations.
best work
Continue

Strength Weakness
• Encourage respect, trust, empathy, and support. • Lack of instability
• Better opportunities for creativity
• Smarter decision-making.
• Lack of innovation
• Problem solving skills • Lack of engagement
• Reduced rates of employee turnover.
• Lack of Coordination
• Improved goodwill of the business.
• Be fair and identify potential bias
Challenges faced
• Difference of language
• Increase social tension
• Civic disengagement
• Segregation.
• Weakening of Common Bonds.
• Territorial Disputes. Lack of time.
• Limited capital/investment.
• Resistance to change or new ways of thinking.
• Too much focus on existing work.
Continue
• Unethical Leadership.
• Discrimination and Harassment.
• Unrealistic and Conflicting Goals.
• Questionable Use of Technology.
• Lack of collaboration.
• Lack of motivation.
• Poor work ethic
• Potential risk of inefficient communication,
• It sometimes complex
• Personal conflicts and also social loafing, group thinking and risk-shifting
Continue
• Inflexibility among team members.
• Lack of scope for individual freedom.
• Lack of time.
• Limited capital/investment.
• Resistance to change or new ways of thinking.
• Too much focus on existing work.
• Low engagement.
• Culture differences
Lessons Learned
• Support personal development.
• It leads to specialization.
• Increase honesty
• Increase compassion
• Increase generosity
• Increase courage
• Strong relationship among team members
Continue
• Increased productivity
• Increased communication
• Increases effectiveness and efficiency
• Fulfill goals and objectives
• Clear vision and mission
• Provides direction
• Provides path to reach goal
• Increases effectiveness and efficiency
Improve Leadership skills
• Improved productivity.
• Reduced costs.
• Increased competitiveness.
• Improved brand recognition and value.
• New partnerships and relationships.
• Increased turnover and improved profitability.
Continue
• Similar work priorities
• Equal collaboration and increased diversity.
• Strong leadership.
• Good active listening.
• Effective communication, collaboration, adaptability, creativity, and
empathy.
• Encourages greater productivity and skill-building.
Continue
• Goal could be achieved
• Boosts your self-confidence.
• Helps you create long-term goals
• Gives you a greater sense of what your ambitions and career goals are.
• Helps you manage your stress level
References
• Fisk, P. (2002). The making of a digital leader. Business Strategy Review, 13 (1), 43-50. 
• Ailon, G. (2008). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Culture's Consequences in a value test of its
own design. The Academy of Management Review, 33(4):885-904.
• Cole, M., and J. S. Bruner (1971) Cultural differences and inferences about
psychological processes . American Psychologist 26:867-876.
• Ahearn, K.K., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A. (2004) Leader political skill and team
performance. Journal of Management, 30(3), 309–327.
• Evans and MacMillan (2014). Ethical issues in criminal justice and public safety. (4th
ed). Edmond Montgomery Publications, Toronto.
Continue
• Hodges, Charles B. (2004). Designing to motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate
in e-learning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1-7.
• Bradford, R. W., & Duncan, J. P. (2000). Simplified strategic planning. Worcester, MA:
Chandler House Press.
• Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M. and Sapprasert, K. (2012) Innovation: Exploring the knowledge
base, Research Policy 41, 1132-1153.
• Lencioni, P. M. (2010). The five dysfunctions of a team. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Alfred, R. (2013) ‘Values-led businesses care about behaviors not buzz words’, Guardian,
Business section.
Thank You!!!

You might also like