Arpit Bansal 15 Gaurav Dave 21 Juhi Kumar 23 Kailash Kumar Sahu 24 Namrata Kaushal 32 Vikas Yadav 65
Arpit Bansal 15 Gaurav Dave 21 Juhi Kumar 23 Kailash Kumar Sahu 24 Namrata Kaushal 32 Vikas Yadav 65
Arpit Bansal 15 Gaurav Dave 21 Juhi Kumar 23 Kailash Kumar Sahu 24 Namrata Kaushal 32 Vikas Yadav 65
1 21 23 24
3 6
Here namrata will add a swastika signwhatever she feels correct will be inserted
PERCEPTION
The study of perception is concerned with identifying the process through which we interpret and organize sensory information to produce our conscious experience of objects and object relationship. Perception is the process of receiving information about and making sense of the world around us. It involves deciding which information to notice, how to categorize this information and how to interpret it within the framework of existing knowledge. A process by which individuals organize and interpret their sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their environment.
1.
Sensation An individuals ability to detect stimuli in the immediate environment. Selection The process a person uses to eliminate some of the stimuli that have been sensed and to retain others for further processing.
3.
3.
Organization The process of placing selected perceptual stimuli into a framework for storage. Translation The stage of the perceptual process at which stimuli are interpreted and given meaning.
Perception
Factors in the Target Novelty Motion Sounds Size Background Proximity Similarity
PRINCIPLES OF ORGANISATION
Figure and Ground Principle of Similarity Principle of Proximity Principle of continuity Principle of Closure Principle of Symmetry
10
10
11
Gestalt Approach
Figure
Ground
12
12
Similarity
Continuity Proximity
Closure
Symmetry
13
13
14
14
YELLOW BLUE ORANGE BLACK RED GREEN PURPLE YELLOW RED ORANGE GREEN BLACK BLUE RED PURPLE GREEN BLUE ORANGE
15
15
16
ATTRIBUTION THEORY
When individuals observe behavior, they attempt to determine whether it is internally or externally caused. observation Interpretation H Distictinctiveness L H Consensus L Attribution of cause External Internal External Internal
ndividual behavior
H Consistency L
Internal External
17
H high
L- Low
Consistency Does this person behave in this same manner at other times ?
Internal Attribution
xternal ttribution
18
Selective Perception : People selectively interpret what they see on the basis of their interests, background, experience and attitudes.
Halo Effect : Drawing a general impressions about an individual on the basis of a single charecteristics.
19
Contrast Effect : Evaluation of a persons characteristics that are effected by comparisons with other people recently encountered who rank higher or lower on the same characteristics.
Stereotyping : Judging someone on the basis of ones perception of the group to which that persons belongs.
20
Causes of Behavior
Internal factors Personal characteristics that cause behavior (e.g., ability, effort) External factors Environmental characteristics that cause behavior (e.g., task difficulty, good/bad luck)
21
21
Individual Performance
E
22
22
People
People
Low
High
B C D Tasks
B C D Tasks
E
23
23
Individual Performance
Time
Individual Performance
Time
24
24
25
25
26
26
tendency to underestimate the influence of external factors and overestimate the influence of internal factors when making judgments about the behavior of others We blame people first, not the situation
Self-Serving Bias
The
tendency for individuals to attribute their own successes to internal factors while putting the blame for failures on external factors It is our success but their failure
27
27
Employment Interview Perceptual biases of raters affect the accuracy of interviewers judgments of applicants Formed in a single glance 1/10 of a second! Performance Expectations Self-fulfilling prophecy (Pygmalion effect): The lower or higher performance of employees reflects preconceived leader expectations about employee capabilities Performance Evaluations Appraisals are often the subjective (judgmental) perceptions of appraisers of another employees job performance Critical impact on employees
28
28
U FL IN
EN
CE
IN FL U
EN C
ES
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39