CH 2-A Workforce Planning
CH 2-A Workforce Planning
CH 2-A Workforce Planning
WORKFORCE ASSESSMENT
Seasonal forecasts -
-
Interest forecasts
Competition-based forecasts
Legal forecast
Other factors
A major acquisition
Emergence of ominous new competitor
Forecasting Supply of
Personnel plan requires
Inside Candidates
Forecasting Supply of
Outside Candidates
WORKFORCE PLANNING AND
FORECASTING
Limitations
Employment needs rarely depend on just on passage of time
Other factors like changes in volumes and productivity also
affect staffing
RATIO ANALYSIS
Refers to making forecasts based on historic ratio
between (1) some causal factor e.g. sales volume, and (2)
the number of employees required e.g. number of sales
person
Limitations
Assumes that similar conditions exists in the organization and
its environment.
BASIC RATIO ANALYSIS FORMULA
Ratio analysis formulas use a specific historical business
data, commonly called a business factor, to establish a
quantitative relationship between the factor and
employee requirements.
The factor can be anything from previous staffing
levels to historical gross sales revenues to historic
employee data.
Once a ratio calculation is complete, it’s then compared
against a forecast for the coming year to determine
employee demand.
BASIC RATIO ANALYSIS FORMULA
Assume the previous year's gross sales for a small-
business retail operation were $750,000 and the business
employed the equivalent of 15 full-time employees.
The sales-to-employee ratio is 75:15, which can be
reduced to 5:1
$50,000 in sales the business requires the equivalent of
one full-time employee.
If sales forecasts predict sales will increase by $100,000,
HR will need to hire the equivalent of two full-time
employees.
SCATTER PLOT
Shows how two variables- e.g. sales and your firm’s
staffing levels- are related
Size of Hospital No. of registered nurses
(No. of beds)
200 240
300 260
400 470
500 500
600 620
700 660
800 820
900 860
SCATTER PLOT
SCATTER PLOT- DRAWBACKS
They generally focus on historic sales/personnel
relationships and assumes that the firm’s existing
activities will continue as is
They tend to support compensation plan that reward
managers for managing ever-larger staffs, irrespective
of the company’s strategic needs
They tend to institutionalize existing ways of doing
things, even in the face of change
FORECASTING SUPPLY OF INSIDE
CANDIDATES
Requires knowledge of current employees’ skills set-
their current qualifications
DISCUSS
STAFFING TABLE
Provides a clear graphical view of all organizational
jobs and the current number of employees at each job.
Presents a simple visual understanding of an
organization’s staffing level within each department and
the organization as a whole
This information is useful in evaluating staffing levels
by department, branch, or project; the types of staff at
each level; and the combination of staff in all categories
Are relatively simple and thus frequently used as a
precursor to more complex methods of forecasting future
HR supply, such as a Markov analysis.
REPLACEMENT CHART
Is used to estimate vacancies in higher level jobs and
identify how potential HR supply can fill these vacancies
via internal movements from lower levels jobs.
Comprehensive replacement chart will include
information regarding possible replacements for vertical
or horizontal movement.
Generally, it includes information about employees’
performance, readiness to fill the position, and
education.
PRESIDENT/CEO
Possible Replacements
L. Moffat E/2/M
J. Bennett S/2/P
R. Ellis E/3/M
M. Manoy S/1/M
Process
Generally five or six experts participate in the NGT. Each expert is asked the
same specific question (e.g., What are your predictions for future HR demand
in this branch/unit/department/organization for the next X number of years?
What are the causes of any expected changes in demand?). Independently,
each expert writes down their solutions to the issue or question.
Experts meet face to face (usually around a table) and individually present
their solutions. Solutions recorded on flipcharts or blackboards to allow for
comparisons in later steps. Interruptions and discussions discouraged at this
point.
Clarification questions after presentation
E02 19 10 6 3
E04 35 32 3
E05 26 21 5
E06 16 16
E07 10 10
E08 3 3
Total 280
E01 8 58 10 Promotion of
supervisors
E02 12 12
E03 118 118
E04 33 33
E05 26 26
E06 20 20
E07 10 10
E08 3 2 01 resigned
2015 Plant Manager Department Foreman Machine General Exits
Superintenden Operator Labour
2014 t
3 0 0
Department
Superintendent 7% 76% 12% 5%
N=15
1 1
11 2
Foreman N=60
3% 75% 9% 15%
2 45 5 8
Machine
Operator
N=102 15% 12% 25%
5 12 26
General Labour
N=306
10% 67% 23%
Projected 4 13 62 85 31
217 205 105 70
Supply 2015
Current Tech 1 Tech 2 Tech 3 Tech Sup Quit
Foreman 60 75