The document discusses the evolution of theories of public finance from classical economics to modern times. It begins with Adam Smith, who advocated for free enterprise capitalism and limited government intervention. John Stuart Mill also supported laissez-faire policies. Keynesian economics emerged in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression, promoting active fiscal policy using taxation, spending, and deficits. Keynes significantly changed views on public finance. Socialist thought developed in response to perceived exploitation under capitalism, with Marx critiquing Smith's views.
The document discusses the evolution of theories of public finance from classical economics to modern times. It begins with Adam Smith, who advocated for free enterprise capitalism and limited government intervention. John Stuart Mill also supported laissez-faire policies. Keynesian economics emerged in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression, promoting active fiscal policy using taxation, spending, and deficits. Keynes significantly changed views on public finance. Socialist thought developed in response to perceived exploitation under capitalism, with Marx critiquing Smith's views.
The document discusses the evolution of theories of public finance from classical economics to modern times. It begins with Adam Smith, who advocated for free enterprise capitalism and limited government intervention. John Stuart Mill also supported laissez-faire policies. Keynesian economics emerged in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression, promoting active fiscal policy using taxation, spending, and deficits. Keynes significantly changed views on public finance. Socialist thought developed in response to perceived exploitation under capitalism, with Marx critiquing Smith's views.
The document discusses the evolution of theories of public finance from classical economics to modern times. It begins with Adam Smith, who advocated for free enterprise capitalism and limited government intervention. John Stuart Mill also supported laissez-faire policies. Keynesian economics emerged in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression, promoting active fiscal policy using taxation, spending, and deficits. Keynes significantly changed views on public finance. Socialist thought developed in response to perceived exploitation under capitalism, with Marx critiquing Smith's views.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16
CAPITALISM:
PUBLIC FINANCE AND FREE ENTERPRISE 1. Adam Smith “CLASSICAL ECONOMICS” - SYSTEM OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT INITIATED BY ADAM SMITH.
HIS BOOK: AN INQUIRY INTO THE CAUSES OF
THE WEALTH OF NATIONS BECAME THE FOUNDATION OF A NEW GENERATION OF WRITERS, DESIRING TO BUILD A NEW SCIENCE OF POLITICAL ECONOMY.
FREE ENTERPRISE OR CAPITALISM AS THE
“IDEAL” POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEM.
MAN IS MOTIVATED BY SELF-INTEREST,
PROVIDED THE MORAL BASIS FOR THE ASCENDANCY OF THE CAPITALIST.
SMITH FAVORED COMPLETE FREEDOM FOR
BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND STRONG SMITH DEVOTED BOOK V OF HIS WORK TO “PUBLIC FINANCE” - TAXATION, BUDGETING AND BORROWING FROM THE NINETEENTH CENTURY TO THE EARLY PART OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY.
SMITH PUT TAXATION ON SCIENTIFIC AND
EQUITABLE BASIS. THE STATE SHOULD OBSERVE IN DERIVING ITS INCOME MORE EFFICIENTLY, YET EQUITABLY.
HE STRONGLY ADVISED AGAINST THE LARGE
SCALE BORROWING. BORROWING SHOULD ONLY BE RESORTED TO IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND SHOULD BE REPAID AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
HE WAS CONSEQUENTLY AGAINST DEFICIT
SPENDING AND ADVOCATED THE CONCEPT OF A BALANCED BUDGET. FOR HIM GOVERNMENT TENDS TO BE WASTEFUL AND IRRESPONSIBLE SINCE IT IS NOT MOTIVATED BY SELF INTEREST.
ITS ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE MINIMIZED AND THE
PRIVATE SECTOR SHOULD PROVIDE FOR THE NEEDS OF SOCIETY THROUGH THE MARKET MECHANISM.
HIS DOCTRINES ADVOCATED LIMITED
EXPENDITURES.
THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ADAM SMITH TO
CAPITALISM ARE NOT LIMITED TO PUBLIC FINANCE ALONE. AS A MATTER OF FACT, HIS IDEAS ON THE LATTER WERE LARGELY SHAPED BY HIS STAND ON THE MORAL “RIGHTNESS” OF CAPITALISM AND THE PERCEIVED FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT UNDER SUCH A SYSTEM. John Stuart Mill A LAISSEZ-FAIRE ADVOCATE - HIS CORRELATION OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE STATE TO PUBLIC EXPENDITURES.
GOVERNMENT ACTION USUALLY INVOLVED ADDED
EXPENSES WHICH WAS USUALLY DEFRAYED OUT OF COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS LEVIED UPON THE PERSONS AND PROPERTIES OF THE STATE.
GOVERNMENTS WOULD INTERFERE AS LITTLE AS
POSSIBLE WITH THE PRIVATE AFFAIRS OF THE PEOPLE
“THE BUSINESS OF LIFE IS BETTER PERFORMED
WHEN THOSE WHO HAVE AN IMMEDIATE INTEREST IN IT ARE LEFT TO TAKE THEIR OWN COURSE, UNCONTROLLED EITHER BY THE MANDATE OF LAW OR THE MEDDLING OF ANY PUBLIC FUNCTIONARY.
GOVERNMENTAL INTERVENTION AS IN PUBLIC
EXPENDITURES FOR THE WELFARE OF THE STATE. Keynesian Public Finance PRIOR TO THE 1930’S, LABOR COULD BE FULLY EMPLOYED CONTINUOUSLY AND THE RESOURCES OF A COUNTRY COULD BE UTILIZED MOST EFFICIENTLY IF GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES WERE KEPT AT A MINIMUM.
GOVERNMENT WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO INTERFERE WITH
THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM, EXCEPT FOR MINIMAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS.
HOWEVER, THE ECONOMIC DEPRESSION OF THE 1930’S
CHANGED ALL THESE VIEWS.
TO THEIR DISMAY, ECONOMISTS REALIZED THAT
INDUSTRIALIZED ECONOMIES WOULD NOT RESPOND ANYMORE TO THE PRESCRIPTIONS OF THE CLASSICAL ECONOMISTS.
THEY DISCOVERED THAT ECONOMICS UNDER THE
CAPITALIST OR FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM ARE SUBJECT TO CYCLICAL FLUCTUATIONS AND TO THE RAVAGES OF THE INFLATION, STAGNATION AND RECESSION. IN 1936, THE WHOLE DIRECTION AND EMPHASIS OF MODERN CAPITALISTS ECONOMICS WAS CHANGED BY THE APPEARANCE OF A SINGLE BOOK. THE GENERAL THEORY OF EMPLOYMENT, INTEREST, AND MONEY WRITTEN BY THE ENGLISH ECONOMIST, JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES.
IN THIS BOOK, KEYNES DEMOLISHED THE DEARLY
HELD ECONOMIC VIEWS OF ADAM SMITH AND HIS SUCCESSORS.
ON PUBLIC FINANCE ISSUES, HE INSISTED THAT THE
GOVERNMENT COULD AND SHOULD INFLUENCE THE PRICES OF GOODS AND SERVICES, THE AMOUNT OF CONSUMPTION, THE DEGREE OF EMPLOYMENT AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL INCOME OF THROUGH TAXATION, BORROWINGS AND THE PURCHASE AND SALE COMMODITIES AND LABOR. KEYNES DEVELOPED THE CONCEPT OF FISCAL POLICY AS A TOOL FOR CORRECTING IMBALANCES IN THE ECONOMY WITH ITS IMPORTANCE AS A STABILIZING AND COMPENSATORY TOOL.
TAXES WOULD INFLUENCE CONSUMPTION AND
REDISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND WEALTH AS WELL
FUNDS WOULD BE EXPENDED NOT ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE
OF DISPENSING LIMITED SERVICES BUT TO AFFECT INCOME AND EMPLOYMENT LEVELS AS WELL.
BORROWINGS WOULD BE ENGAGED IN NOT MERELY TO
BALANCE THE BUDGET BUT TO FULFILL ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES LIKE MOPPING UP EXCESS LIQUIDITY AND TRANSFERRING OF RESOURCES FROM ONE SECTOR TO ANOTHER.
DEFICIT FINANCING WAS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL AT
THAT TIME. IT DIRECTLY CONFRONTED SMITH’S HALLOWED VIEWS ON THE BALANCED BUDGET.
THE IMPACT OF KEYNES ON MODERN PUBLIC FINANCE IS FELT NOT ONLY IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES BUT IN LCD’S AS WELL.
HIS CONCEPT OF AGGRESSIVE ECONOMICS AND
MACROECONOMICS, AND HIS BASIC TERMINOLOGIES - FISCAL POLICY, MONETARY POLICY, DEFICIT FINANCING, COMPENSATORY FINANCING -ARE NOW PART AND PARCEL OF PUBLIC FINANCE VOCABULARY.
KEYNES’ IDEAS ARE SAID TO HAVE REVOLUTIONIZED
PUBLIC FINANCE IN THE SENSE THAT HE COMPLETELY CHANGED THE EARLIER THEORIES OF FREE ENTERPRISE ECONOMISTS.
HE INTRODUCED THE CONCEPT OF GOVERNMENT
MANAGEMENT OF THE ECONOMY WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM. ON THE OTHER HAND, CRITICS OF THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM SAY THAT HE IS A REACTIONARY IN THE SENSE THAT HIS THEORIES “SAVED” CAPITALISM FROM COLLAPSE.
Socialist Public Finance SPARKED BY THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, CAPITALISM SPREAD QUICKLY THROUGHOUT EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES.
IN THE PROCESS, PRODUCTION OF GOODS AND SERVICES
ROSE PHENOMENALLY; MARKET EXPANDED AND COLONIES INCREASED. AT THE SAME TIME, THE DRIVE FOR PROFIT RESULTED IN EXPLOITATION OF THE UNORGANIZED WORKING CLASS.
IT WAS AGAINST THE BACKDROP THAT COMMUNISM
EMERGED AS A DIRECT CHALLENGE TO THE CAPITALIST PHILOSOPHY ESPOUSED BY ADAM SMITH.
KARL MARX (1818-1883) WROTE HIS DAS KAPITAL, IN
ANSWER TO SMITH’S WEALTH OF NATIONS
REFLECTION PAPER:
AMONG THE THEORISTS/PHILOSOPHIES IN
EARLY PUBLIC FINANCE, WHO/WHAT DO YOU THINK HAS THE MOST IMPACT (POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE) IN PUBLIC FINANCE IN THE PHILIPPINES? EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER.