Prepared by : Muhammad Usman (IC-301) Rafia Himayel (IC-024) Ramsha Shamim (IC-012) Tehreem Sadaqat (IC-022)

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

AS HYDROPHOBIC / LIPOPHILIC

ADSORBENT FOR REMOVAL OF


OIL
CONTAMINANTS
FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS.

Prepared by;
Muhammad Usman (IC-301)
Rafia Himayel (IC-024)
Ramsha Shamim (IC-012)
Tehreem Sadaqat (IC-022)

FYP Instructor; Dr. Amtul Qayyum.


Background
• Used Cooking Oil is one of the most commonly water pollutant
• Even a small quantity can cause a lot of harm.
• Careless disposal of cooking oil into drainage system,
onto land or to watercourses can be harmful to river birds, fish, and wildlife.
Problems Caused by Waste Cooking Oil

coating
animals and
plants with
oil Form
Be toxic and products
form toxic that linger
products for many Foul
Produce years shorelines,
rancid clog water
odors Catch fire treatment
when plants
ignition
source are
present
Methods for Removal of Cooking Oil from
Domestic Effluents.
1 Bioremediation
2 Coagulation Flocculation process
3 Grease Recovery Devices (GRDs)
4 Floatation.

However these methods are costly and need expert technicians.


Low Cost Adsorbents for Oil Removal

Adsorption is cost effect, easy to conduct method for removal of oil

contaminants from water resources.

Cotton-Polystyrene based adsorbents for removal of oil from aqueous

solutions were synthesized and characterized by our previous batch.

However we aimed to improve the method to improve its performance.


Objective of the Study

Synthesis, Characterization and performance evaluation of efficient low cost

cotton-polystryene-nanozinc adsorbents for cooking oil removal and recovery

from domestic and restaurant effluents.

Statistical optimization of adsorption process instead of one factor at a time

(OFAT).
Methodology
• Synthesis of cotton-polystyrene-nano zinc composite adsorbent
• Performance evaluation
• Characterization
i. Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
ii. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
iii. Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
iv. Hydrophobicity.
• Statistical Optimization
Synthesis ( Route # 01)
Sodium
Zinc Acetate Washed and Ethanol
Hydroxide Centrifugation
Solution dried
Solution

Stearic acid Cotton balls


Treated cotton Dried
Dried ethanolic and fabric
fabric and balls
solution

1% Polystyrene
Dried
solution in THF
Synthesis (Route # 02)
Sodium
Pre treated Zinc acetate
Hydroxide
cotton balls and ethanolic Orbital Shaker Stearic acid
Ethanolic
fabric solution
solution

Dried 1% Polystyrene in Treated cotton


THF Dried
balls an fabric

Polystyrene coated cotton balls Polystyrene coated cotton fabric


obtained from Route 2 obtained from Route 2
Effect of synthetic composition on adsorbent Performance

i. In one route (in Route#02) Zinc Acetate ethanolic


solution was not used in the route.

ii. In one route (in Route#02) Stearic Acid ethanolic


solution was not used in the route.

iii. In one route (in Route#02) THF solution and


polystyrene coating was skipped from the route.
Performance Evaluation.
ROUTE # 01;
HYDROPOBICITY:

LIPOPHILICITY:
ROUTE # 02:
Oil Adsorption Capacity [OAC (g/g)]:
•The
  Oil Adsorption Capacity, OAC for experimental materials was
considered as the ratio between the weight of absorbed oil (moil) in
comparison with the weight of adsorbent (madsorbent).

OAC= = , g/g
Where;
moil, mwater = mass of absorbed oil and absorbed water,
mtotal = total mass of adsorbent after absorption experiment;
m  = mass of dry adsorbent.
o
OAC of Cotton Balls
9
8

7
6
5

4
3
2

0
Route 1 Route 2 W/O W/O Stearic W/O Zinc
Polystyrene Acid Acetate

Cotton Balls

W/O
Polystyrene
Fourier Transformation Infra-Red Spectroscopy (FTIR)
Cotton Ball Polystyrene Composite;
Cotton Fabric Polystyrene Composite;
Gantt Chart
Work for this Semester;
• Thermo gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
• Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
• Statistical Optimization
• Recycling
• Report writing

You might also like