Bigbasket Case Study: To Localise or Not To Localise ?

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

BigBasket Case Study

To Localise or Not to Localise ?

Diksha R Srivastava
The problem What is Localisation?
Localisation is the process of adapting a
A competitive analysis report comes to product or service to a particular language,
the CEO of bb stating that localisation culture, market, and desired local look-and-
is one of the most critical areas where feel. Localization encompasses the entire
bigbasket lacks and hence is missing product including software, help files,
out on penetration. The CEO requests documentation, packaging and marketing
material.
the PM (you) to work on this problem
and figure out whether bb should invest Need
in localisation and if yes, get started on
the project. The goal is to provide a product with the look
and feel of having been created for the target
market in an effort to eliminate or minimize
local sensitivities.

Ref - https://www.enolalabs.com/blog/archives/what-is-localization
Market Study ● 28 states and 8 UTs
What does Localisation imply in
Indian Context?
Country Profile ● 22 major languages and 19,500
dialects
● 390 million users accessed the ● Language translation
internet via their mobile phones ● Adapting to local color sensitivities
● Each state or region has its unique
cultural identity which asserts the through graphics
need for localisation ● Addressing local regulations

Market sentiments Competition

Almost 600 million Indians only use their mobile Major platforms like Amazon supports
phones to make phone calls because they feel globalisation and 50+ languages on
there are not enough apps in their mother tongue the app. Amazon is considered a
competitor as it has ventured into
Ability to obtain information in consumer’s own grocery delivery as well
language is more important This is also an opportunity to
differentiate with home competitors
Very few mobile apps are catering to localisation like grofers , swiggy instamart ,
and miss out on penetration opportunities freshtohome
Feature-Market Fit | Validation Study
Example
Prerequisite Smartphone penetration = 60 %
BB penetration = 12%
Gap in penetration = 48%
The prerequisites for BigBasket to operate in any state/City at the consumer
level is the internet connectivity and smartphone penetration

Methodology

1. For each state in India , (28 states) , determine the difference between
smartphone and internet penetration and BB penetration

Gap = [Smartphone penetration in the state ] - [BB penetration in the state] = xx%

2. Group the states having difference >45% , 15-45% and <15%


3. For states having >45% gap in penetration
a. Determine the states that have an active BB supply chain operation
b. Determine the top 5 cities of those states in terms of GPD
c. For those cities , conduct primary and secondary research to understand
the needs of the local market and list the factors preventing adoption of
BB
Minimum Viable Product Go To Market/ Launch
● Among the states that satisfy the following criteria Strategy of MVP
○ >45% gap in penetration
○ Active BB supply chain operations
Target Market
● Identify the top 3 languages spoken in those states The (>45% gap in penetration) states identified with active
● Determine all static and dynamic strings/keys displayed on BB supply chain operations
the standard app . Ensure that they aren’t hard coded and
Distribution of service
are localizable App and Website
● Use public API like google translate to translate the keys into
the top 3 languages Product messaging and positioning
● Verify the translations of the keys with experts (One time Social marketing of localisation to be done in major social
cost) platforms like fb,insta etc , app website and app description.
● Give app user options to select the top 3 identified languages Advertisements in local newspapers and ads in regional TV
channels.
(for the state-city under study) to help navigate BB app
Assumptions Pricing
Localisation to be offered at no additional costs to consumer
● The primary research conducted has concluded the need for
localisation in the states having highest gaps in penetration
● Language aspect of localisation has proved more important than
designing graphics based on locales
Build-Buy-Partner Analysis 2 - Year Roadmap
● Target the states having >45% gap in penetration and
Based on the 1. internal resources/assets and 2. continuously monitor success in those regions and
core competency we will go ahead with 1 out of the implement feedback
3 options below to save the Time to Market of the ● Incrementally target the other states and cities in the
feature pipeline having gaps of 15-45% and <15% . Monitor
success and feedback
● Buy - existing solutions in the market like ‘lokalise’ or ● Enhance UX/UI to ensure availability of language option
identify open source softwares on app as per locale
● Build - Hire Translators and build the properties file for ● Look into other aspects of localisation that can handled
each language with own resources such as graphics and designs catering to regional
● Partner- and consult with a translation company that preferences
is familiar with working with mobile apps. With correct
tools such as translation databases that build a bank of
translation assets (common phrases, sentences,
paragraphs) to greatly diminish the time and increase
the quality of translation.
max growth

Thank You
Diksha R Srivastava
[email protected]
+91-9836483936

You might also like