Research Methodology: Validity

Research Methodology
Validity
Group Members:
• Muskaan Joshi - 20202015

• Mohit Goel - 20202123
• Manushi Kanabar - 20202112
• Vijay Soni - 20202054
• Ismail Retiwala - 20202152
• Rakesh Ram - 20202037
Definition :
 Research validity in surveys relates to the extent at which the survey

measures right elements that need to be measured. In simple terms,
validity refers to how well an instrument as measures what it is intended to
measure.
 Research validity can be divided into two groups: Internal and External. It
can be specified that “internal validity refers to how the research findings
match reality, while external validity refers to the extend to which the
research findings can be replicated to other environments”
Face Construct
Validity Validity
Types of
validity
Content
Criterion
Validity validity
Construct Validity :
• Construct validity evaluates whether a measurement tool really represents

the thing we are interested in measuring. It’s central to establishing the
overall validity of a method.
• What is construct validity?
• Example
Content Validity :
• Content validity assesses whether a test is representative of all aspects of

the construct.
• To produce valid results, the content of a test, survey or measurement

method must cover all relevant parts of the subject it aims to measure.
• Example
Face Validity :
• Face validity considers how suitable the content of a test seems

to be on the surface. It’s similar to content validity, but face
validity is a more informal and subjective assessment.
• Does the content of the test appear to be suitable to its aims?
• Example
Criterion Validity :
• Criterion validity evaluates how closely the results of your test

correspond to the results of a different test.
• What is criterion validity?
• Example
Validity Depend’s on
Internal External
Internal validity
• Internal validity is the extent to which you can be confident that a cause-
and-effect relationship established in a study cannot be explained by other
factors.
• Why internal validity matters
• How to check whether your study has internal validity

Factors Improving Internal Validity :
• Blinding
• Experimental Manipulation
• Random Selection
• Randomization
• Study protocol
Factors that Threaten Internal Validity:
• Attrition
• Confounding
• Diffusion
• Experimenter Bias
• Historical Events
• Instrumentation
• Maturation
Factors that Threaten Internal Validity:
• Statistical Regression
• Testing
External Validity
• External validity is the extent to which you can generalize the findings of a
study to other situations, people, settings and measures.
• The aim of scientific research is to produce generalizable knowledge about

the real world. Without high external validity, you cannot apply results
from the laboratory to other people or the real world.
Population Validity
External Validity
Ecological Validity
Population Validity :
• Non probability sampling methods

• Lower population validity
• Higher population
• Psychology studies
Ecological Validity :
• Low ecological validity

• Examples
• Improve ecological validitiy
Factors Improving External Validity :
 Consider Psychological Realism:

 Making sure that participants are experiencing real events
 Events main aim
 Do reprocessing or calibration
 Usage of Statistical Methods
 Replicate
 Doing that study again with different sample
 Effect of an independent variable

Factors Improving External Validity :
 Try field Experiments

 Doing study outside laboratory

 Use inclusion and exclusion criteria
 Clearly defined population
Factors that Threaten External Validity:
Pre and post test effect

 Cause and effect relationship disappears
 Sample features
 Responsibility for effect

 Selection bias
 describes differences between groups
Situational Factors
 Affect on generalizability of findings.
Difference between Internal & External Validity :
Internal Validity External Validity

• Conclusions are warranted. • Findings can be generalized.
• Controls extraneous variables. • Outcomes apply to practical
• Eliminates alternative situations.
explanations. • Results apply to the world at large.
• Focus on accuracy and strong • Results can be translated into
research method. another context.
Example :
• Reduce negative mood

• Assigning a sample of participants
• No systematic bias
• Measuring of potential confounding variables
• Population of interest
Conclusion :
Table Of Contents.
 Factors That Improve Internal Validity.
 Factors That Threaten Internal Validity.
 Factors That Improve External Validity.
Factors That Threaten External Validity .
Comparison.
 Example Of Internal And External Validity.
 Similarities.
Bibliography :
• https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/validity
• https://www.activecampaign.com/blog/validity-in-research-design
• https://www.irelandassignmenthelp.com/blogs/types-of-validity-in-researc
h/
THANK YOU

Research Methodology: Validity

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research Methodology: Validity

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research Methodology: Validity

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research Methodology

• Muskaan Joshi - 20202015

 Research validity in surveys relates to the extent at which the survey

• Construct validity evaluates whether a measurement tool really represents

• What is construct validity?

• Content validity assesses whether a test is representative of all aspects of

• To produce valid results, the content of a test, survey or measurement

• Face validity considers how suitable the content of a test seems

• Does the content of the test appear to be suitable to its aims?

• Criterion validity evaluates how closely the results of your test

• What is criterion validity?

• Why internal validity matters

• How to check whether your study has internal validity

• The aim of scientific research is to produce generalizable knowledge about

• Non probability sampling methods

• Low ecological validity

 Consider Psychological Realism:

 Try field Experiments

Pre and post test effect

Internal Validity External Validity

• Reduce negative mood

You might also like