Experimental Psychology and The Scientific Method: Instructor: Mr. Omar T. Bualan
Experimental Psychology and The Scientific Method: Instructor: Mr. Omar T. Bualan
Experimental Psychology and The Scientific Method: Instructor: Mr. Omar T. Bualan
I N S T R U C T O R : M R . O M A R T. B U A L A N
OBJECTIVES
- SCIENCE OF HUMAN
BEHAVIOR AND MENTAL
PROCESSES
scientia
“Knowledge” Content &
Process
ALL AREAS IN PSYCHOLOGY RELY ON
SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
PSYCHOLOGY uses
scientific method?
- A STEP BY STEP PROCESS OF
INVESTIGATION.
1. OB SER V A T IO N
2. A S K A QU ES TI ON
3. D O B A CK G R OU ND R ES EA R CH
4. C ONS TR U CT A HY P O TH ESI S
5. T EST H Y P OT H ESI S TH R O UGH
EX P ER IM ENT
6. A N A L YZ E TH E R ESUL T S
7. D R A W A C ONC L USI ON
8. C OM M U NIC A T E T H E R ESUL T S
9. A P P L Y TH E R ESU L TS
THE NEED FOR
SCIENTIFIC METHOD
• Commonsense Psychology – non-scientific data
gathering that shapes our expectations
• WE ARE ALL COMMONSENSE
PSYCHOLOGISTS
• Our ability to gather data in a “systematic and
impartial” way is constrained by two very important
factors: SOURCES OF PSCHOLOGICAL
INFORMATION & INFERENTIAL STRATEGIES
NONSCIENTIFIC
SOURCES OF DATA
• SEEM CREDIBLE AND TRUSTWORTHY
– friends, family, peers, books, news but not always very
good.
• Once we believe we know something, we tend to
overlook instances that might disconfirm our beliefs, and
we seek, instead, confirmatory instances of behavior –
CONFIRMATION BIAS
– E.g. Horoscope, Friday the 13th and Full moon.
WHO DO WE BELIEVE?
• Popular (“Naniniwala na ako sa forever”)
• Attractive (“Pogi”)
• High in status (“My God, I hate drugs”)
• Seemingly expert (“trust me I’m psychology!”)
• Those who appear confident
• Note: we gather a lot of information about
behaviour from our own observations and
interactions
• Note 2.0: We are unaware of factors that
influence our attitudes and behavior
NONSCIENTIFIC INFERENCE
• All commonsense psychologists are trait theorists
• We are generally more accurate when we know someone well than we judge a
stranger
• TRAIT VS. SITUATION
• STEREOTYPIC EXPECTATIONS can lead us to seek confirmatory
instances of behaviour
• GAMBLER’S FALLACY
• OVERCONFIDENCE BIAS (more data, more confident we are in our judgements)
CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN
SCIENCE
THE SCIENTIFIC MENTALITY
SELF-CORRECTION
GATHERING EMPIRICAL DATA
PUBLICIZING RESULTS
SEEKING GENERAL
PRINCIPLES
REPLICATION
GOOD THINKING
OBJECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL
SCIENCE
DESCRIPTION PREDICTION EXPLANATION CONTROL
OBSERVATION
Systematic noting MEASUREMENT
and recording of
events Assigning numerical EXPERIMENTATION
values to objects or
events or Undertaken to test a hypothesis
characteristics - Predictions must be testable
according to - Predicted outcomes must be
conventional rules observable
- Must be able to measure outcome
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Identifying
Antecedent Set of antecedent conditions ► behavior
Conditions
Between-subjects
Within-subjects Design
Design
SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
CONTROL
Random assignment
Necessary vs.
Sufficient 1. Losing weight
Conditions 2. Experimentation
HISTORY OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
(FROM PSEUDOSCIENCE TO PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE)
FROM PSEUDOSCIENCE TO PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
POP PSYCHOLOGY
WILHELM WUNDT
G. STANLEY HALL
Mental Philosophy - Europe
FROM PSEUDOSCIENCE TO PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
• PSEUDOSCIENCE
Phrenology - Franz Joseph Gall
Physiognomy
Mesmerism/Animal Magnetism - Franz Anton
Mesmer (also known today as hypnosis)
• He use magnet or his hands to mesmerize
• Jean Martin Charcoat continue this.
• Until it was introduced to Josef Breuer and
Sigmund Freud.
FROM PSEUDOSCIENCE TO PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
• Wilhelm Wundt
Established the first experimental psychology laboratory in
Leipzig, Germany in 1879.
Schools of thought: Structuralism
Elements of consciousness: sensation, Images and affections