Regional Safety Review Template
Regional Safety Review Template
Regional Safety Review Template
Previous MOM –
EHS Score
EHS Statistics
FPP Status
COVID-19 Compliances
Minimum 250 no’s UA/UC reporting on Raksha App All Staff Immediate
All work are should be like foundation, trench, track area, wiring All engineer/supervisor
train etc. barricaded/guarded as per risk assessment. Immediate
2
3
4 RE-004, Gr-265 Lingampet-Jagtial-Nizamabad 78 70
10
Note:- Red Colour Indicate the MMR & EHS Score less than 90% & 70% Respectively
Lagging areas :
Tools & Plants, Scaffolding
Electrical Safety, Road & Transport, Work Permit
UA/UC Reporting, Near Miss reporting
Third Party Inspection KEC International Limited 5
EHS Score Improvement Plan
S. Project Action Item Responsibility Target
No. Code Date
Store In
24.02.
1. RE-004 Third Party Inspection charge/EHS 21
Dept
Commercial
22-
2. RE-004 Pre examination Medical Team 02-21
Commercial
3. RE-004 Industrial Socket & Cable Team 25-
02-21
RE-004 20.02.
4. ELCB required GE Dept
21
RE-004 Commercial 20.02.
5. Storage of scrap/Waste material Dept 21
Commercial
RE-004 24.02.
6. Fire Extinguisher in transportation vehicle Dept
2021
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. 6
Raksha App utilization (UA/UC Reported)
250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
250
200
168
150
100
82
50
0
Project-1 Project-2 Project-3 Project-4 Project-5 Project-6 Project-7 Project-8 Project-9 Project-10
KEC International Limited 7
Raksha App utilization (UA/UC Reported)
UA/UC UA/UC
Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending
Repoted Repoted
1 T. Rao 0 17 1
2 P. Pradeep Raju 0 17 2
3 A. Kamaraj 5 12 3
4 Dayanand Prasad 0 17 4
5 Lokeswararao Chintala 0 17 5
6 Saurabh Kumar 23 0 6
7 Nitish Kumar 9 8 7
8 Atul Mishra 0 17 8
9
9 Katam Karunakar Reddy 13 4
10
10 A. Sambha Shiva Rao 5 12
11 Rajdeep Gosh 2 15 11
12 Lingampet- Laxmaiah Nagalla 0 17 12
13 Jagtial- Priyansh Soni 0 17 13
Nizamabad K.B Paswan Project
14 0 17 14 Name
RE-004 15
15 Project Bharat giri 0 17
16 Bhimsen Biswal 1 16 16
17 Mohit Kumar 2 15 17
18 Manish Jatt 3 14 18
19 Gyanranjan Samal 2 15 19
20 Ashish Karma 11 6 20
21 Santosh Kumar Mohanty 0 17 21
22 Kamalesh Kumar Yadav 1 16 22
23 Sambhu Sharma 0 17 23
24 Ashutosh Chourasia 4 13 24
25 Nazir 0 17 25
26 26
27 27
8
Raksha App utilization (UA/UC Reported)
UA/UC UA/UC
Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending
Repoted Repoted
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Project Project
14 Name 14 Name
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
9
Raksha App utilization (UA/UC Reported)
UA/UC UA/UC
Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending
Repoted Repoted
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Project Project
14 Name 14 Name
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
10
Raksha App utilization (UA/UC Reported)
UA/UC UA/UC
Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending
Repoted Repoted
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Project Project
14 Name 14 Name
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
11
Raksha App utilization (UA/UC Reported)
UA/UC UA/UC
Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending Sl No Project Name of Employee Pending
Repoted Repoted
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Project Project
14 Name 14 Name
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
12
RAKSHA APP Reporting – Best Performer
No. of UA/UC No. of UA/UC
Sl No Name of the Project Name of Employee Reported Closed
Lingampet – Jagtial-Nizamabad
4 RE-004 Project Katam Karunakar Reddy 13 13
10
13
Raksha App utilization (Other Processes)
TSV Reported
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4
3.5
3
Number of TSV
2.5
2 2
2
1.5
0.5
0
Project-1 Project-2 Project-3 Project-4 Project-5 Project-6 Project-7 Project-8 Project-9 Project-10
1 L
5
Region
6
10
15
Weekly Safety Review – Project-1
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 16
Weekly Safety Review – Project-2
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 17
Weekly Safety Review – Project-3
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 18
Weekly Safety Review – Project-4
S. No. Point Discussed
2. Ladder secure
4. Housekeeping
5. Reporting of UA/UC/WSN/NM
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Note:- Weekly review meeting done on dated 16.02.2021 1. WER Conducted on 16-02-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 13
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes 19
Weekly Safety Review – Project-5
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 20
Weekly Safety Review – Project-6
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 21
Weekly Safety Review – Project-7
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 22
Weekly Safety Review – Project-8
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 23
Weekly Safety Review – Project-9
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 24
Weekly Safety Review – Project-10
S. No. Point Discussed
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Roadblock on any EHS Issue discussed in above Reviews :- 1. WER Conducted on 00-00-2021
2. No. of Participants (Including PM): 00
MoM Circulated to all concerned : Yes/No 25
FATALITY PREVENTION PLAN – REGION
% Compliance
Gap Identification & Action Plan (Review)
Sr. FPP Attributes Performance Indicators
No. Project- Project- Project- Project- Project- Project- Project- Project- Project- Project-
Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
55 Illumination
Workplace
at No. of Solar Lighting Tower
Required 0
No. of Solar Lighting Tower
56 Available 0
No. of Vehicle at site (Each
57 Vehicle including Dumper, 12
Vehicle Movement Hydra, Truck etc.)
58 No. of Vehicles with Green Tag 11
Everyone is
empowered to stop the
59 work if any of the
above are not being
Number of WSN issued by
individuals other than EHSO 0
adhered as per the
mandated compliance
0
Week-1 Week-2 Week-3 Week-4 Overall
KECmarked
Note:-Deviation less than 5% have been marked in Yellow & Deviation more than 5% have been International Limited
in Red Colour30
FATALITY PREVENTION PLAN – REGION
Week-1
Week-2
Week-3
Week-4
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Project-1 Project-2 Project-3 Project-4 Project-5 Project-6 Project-7 Project-8 Project-9 Project-
10
Average Compliance –
Common non-compliances observed :-
Social distancing Labor Tents/Camps
Sanitization at required frequency as per Annexure 5 of SOP
Thermal screening – three times a day
38
COVID-19 Compliances
Non Compliances Projects Action taken/to be taken Compliance status
Percentage compliance of
transportation for employee Lingampet-RE-004 Project To be taken Not start
with maximum 40% capacity
Percentage compliance of
social distancing being
maintained by workmen Lingampet-RE-004 Project To be taken Not start
while using transport at
project.
Good Practice with site Name Good Practice with site Name Good Practice with site Name
Good Practice with site Name Good Practice with site Name Good Practice with site Name
43
“EHS Starts with me and I am responsible for EHS”
THANK YOU
Global Footprint in
100 countries*
*Includes EPC and Supply
www.kecrpg.com