Technology Roadmapping Theory and Practice: Mike Ferrill Principal Facilitator, A-Star SERC
Technology Roadmapping Theory and Practice: Mike Ferrill Principal Facilitator, A-Star SERC
Technology Roadmapping Theory and Practice: Mike Ferrill Principal Facilitator, A-Star SERC
Mike Ferrill
Principal Facilitator, A-Star SERC
20/12/10
Today's Overall Objective
• Theory of Roadmapping
– Introduce the concept of roadmapping
– Discuss the theory of roadmapping – what does a
roadmap need to show?
– Explore different types of roadmap architectures
– Share some case study examples
• Practical Use of Roadmapping
– Operation and Technology Roadmapping (OTR)
• Beyond Roadmapping
– Issues with roadmapping
– Next generation approaches
Why Roadmap?
• The objective of roadmapping is not to create a roadmap!
• A roadmap is a tool to help achieve an objective
– Identify our new products releases and technology investments for the next 5
years
– To identify and prioritise R&D investments for the next 10 years
– To identify where we can reduce cost over the next 3 years through process
implementation and technology
• To reach agreement on a set of needs and the technologies required to
deliver those needs
• To forecast technology development
• To plan and organise technology development within a clear
framework
“The fundamental purpose of the Technology Reviews and
the Technology Roadmaps is to assure that we put in motion
today, what is necessary in order to have the right
technology, processes, components, and experience in place
to meet the future needs for products and services.”
- Bob Galvin
Former Chairman of the Board, Motorola
Risk assessment
analysis
Str
ate
Skills
g
tegy
yf
Market
orm
Stra
Benc ula
hmar tio ce
n
king an
Fin
Time
Market M1 M2
P1 P2 P3
Product
P4
R&D RD 1 RD 2 RD 4 RD 6
programme RD 2 RD 6
Man
s
lp an
Pr
g
eerin
oc
Alliances
ufac
es
ra ch
s
Engin
turi
s e
Re
ng
What is a Roadmap?
20/12/10
What is Technology ?
‘Technology means the processes by which an organization transforms
labor, capital, materials and information into products and service of
greater value.’
• The Innovator’s Dilemma, C.M.Christensen
International
Technology Roadmap
for Semiconductors
Right Company
Emphasis
Roadmap
Answers Future
Accuracy Influence
Industry Company
Landscape Position
Foresight Vehicle Technology
Positioning
Roadmapping
Strategic research requirements
for road vehicles in the UK
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
External influences
External
1 2 3 4
Influences 1.
2.
System 3.
Demonstrator 4.
.
13
Time Window
Technology Readiness Levels
Actual system completed and qualified through test and Proven in Service
8 demonstration in the actual environment / application
Ensure Technology
TechnologyMaturity
20/12/10
Ensure Maturity Level
LevelisisAligned
Alignedwith
withCommercialization
Commercialization Requirement
Requirement
SIMTech Confidenial 14
E.g. Honeywell
New Product Opportunities Potential Product CTQs
made possible by Tech. Supported
by this Technology
In SBU Plan
, Available
20/12/10
What other Opportunities are possible once 15is achieved??
capability
What other Opportunities are possible once capability is achieved??
Industry Roadmaps
The documents
represent best opinion
on the directions of
research into many
areas of technology,
including time-lines up
to about 15 years into
the future
http://www.itrs.net/home.html
National Roadmaps
http://www.foresightvehicle.org.uk/
Foresight Vehicle technology
roadmap: architecture
+5 years +10 years +15 years +20 years
Now Vision
Market / Time
Industry Trends drivers, key issues and uncertainties
drivers
Performance
Evolution of required and desirable functional
measures and performance of road transport systems of the future
targets
• Unite multiple ministries/agencies around a single plan for green buildings research
in Singapore to contribute to carbon reduction targets, economic prosperity and
quality of life goals
• Created a roadmap for 20 years linking national external and internal drivers,
potential state initiatives and R&D expenditure
Operation and Technology
Roadmapping (OTR)
20/12/10
OTR
Operation
Operation & Technology
GET-Up Roadmapping
Roadmapping
To ensure that the technology
Growing Enterprises with
strategy is aligned with the
Technology Upgrade business strategy.
TA-S
Technical Advisory Support
To provide advise on their
T-Up technological related matters and
Technology challenges at a part-time basis.
Technology for
for Enterprise
Enterprise
Capability Upgrade
Secondment of Research
Scientists & Engineers
20/12/10
Principles
• Link industry to research institutes
– Promote long term thinking for industry on how to develop
and embrace new technology
• Link research institutes to industry
– Provide greater direction to the R&D groups for research
programs that will benefit the local industry
20/12/10
See the future!
20/12/10
Technology
Roadmapping
- A practical guide for supporting
technology and product planning
Aims:
• To support the start-up of company-specific TRM processes
• To establish key linkages between technology resources and business drivers
• To identify important gaps in market, product and technology intelligence
• To develop a ‘first-cut’ technology roadmap
• To support technology strategy and planning initiatives in the firm
• To support communication between technical and commercial functions
20/12/10
OTR History
2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2010
•Buy T-Plan •T-Plan Company •Many • 100+ OTR • 140+
•Trial on 3 x Training •45 Roadmaps Internal Exercises OTR
Companies •OTR •42 Companies roadmaps in • 80+ Exercises
Launched RIs Companies • 130+
RI Roadmaps •Update • 10+ Companies
•10 Initial Process Updates • Approx
•100 people development 15%
Trained multiple or
repeat
roadmaps
20/12/10
Some Uses of Roadmaps
“Whole’ company
technology development
plan
New business /
Technology area Integration with R&D
investigation Institute
20/12/10
What
What is
is OTR
OTR ??
ll
t Pu
Products / Services / Applications /
ke
ar
Services / Capabilities / Performance /
‘delivery’
M
Features / Components / Families /
Processes / Systems / Platforms / (know-what)
Opportunities / Requirements / Risks
h
us
Technology / Competences / yp
Knowledge
og
Projects
20/12/10
Example ‘first-cut’ roadmap
20/12/10
Market 12 hr Quote Measure Cycle Time and cost
Trading Pattern
Analysis ?% Reduction
4 hr Quote
(External)
Drivers
18 Months
12 Months
6 Months
Business Malaysia New Service/
(Internal) TPL Model ISO14000 China
In-situ
Repair Balancing
Product / Service
Specific Eng
Product Certification Reverse Eng/ New Enhance Eng
Services Resource
Repair Schemes
Offering
Outsource Repair
Extended Eng Services
Consortium Own Brand
Customised Spares
E-Bus/IT/ Knowledge Mgt web response ReducedE-bus Info/FAQ Website
Knowledge Mgt
of Part Lifecycle
Service Contract e-bus
Partnerships
Quote Time Partnership with other
repairers
Globalisation
Special Global Service
Diagnosis
Service Contract Standard / discount Cust D’base Automatic Sales Visit Plan
Key Acct Mgt Automated Reminders Pricing Repair history D’base
Forecasts
KAM Pilot Introduction
Location of units Job Tracking (in situ/workshop)/ Remote Approval/Sign PDA Visibility
Command Technical D’base Satellite Web-access
visibility to customer
Centre
Autom Checklist
Order Control
Base Sevices
Video of Balancing
20/12/10
Roadmapping ‘ethos’
‘First-cut’ roadmap
• Participatory
• Quick “story”
• Exploratory
• Creative
‘canvas’
• Active
• Capture, structure and share knowledge
- know-why
- know-what Knowledge types:
- know-how • Explicit
- know-when • Tacit
• Implicit
- know-who
- know-where >>>> plans, forecasts, issues, links, challenges, questions, speculation
20/12/10
What commitment is required ?
• Dependent Upon Requirements…
• Roadmap owner
– To keep the roadmap alive !
20/12/10
Roadmap Maturity Curve
20/12/10
Past Now Plans Future Vision
Actioned /
l
ul
Actioning
tP
ke
ar
M
h
us
yp
Theme:
og
Why Not ?
ol
hn
Not
c
•No
No resource
resource
Te
•Not convinced
Not convinced
Actioned •Drivers
Drivers changed
changed
•Valid
Valid decision
decision
•Postponed
Postponed
Theme:
Why Not on
‘Car Park’ Not on
Roadmap ?
roadmap •Drivers
Drivers changed
changed
Products & •New
New direction
direction
Drivers
Services
20/12/10
“CLOSE ENCOUNTER” WITH
OTR
Year: 2003
1st to introduce patented,
state-of-the-art, prefabricated
Internal Floating Roof
YEAR 2003
Technology Road Map on the Company
YEAR 2004
Operation and Technology Roadmap Internal
Floating Covers
YEAR 2007
OTR on internationalizing VAP-O-LOC range
of products
A
LESSON
FROM
GEESE
AUTHOR UNKNOWN
CLICK TO ADVANCE SLIDES
Case study: Singular ID
• Undertaken within research institute
– R&D project with commercial potential
– Spin-off process complex
– Company growth and strategy important – business plan
• Objectives
– Breakdown the spin-off process
– Establish milestones for the company’s business plan
– Clarify market need and products / services
– Use very limited resources efficiently
Singular ID
Mobile phone, internet connection or
EPOS system transmits the data to a
remote database
Tag attached to
item of value
60 m
Physical structure of a
Singular ID tag
Start-ups
• Application to Start-ups
– Fresh canvas
– Develop simultaneously with
business plan
– Correlate with growth, product
development, marketing, etc
– Capture ‘spin-off’ transition to
operational company
– 2 – 3 years time span works well – 1
year very detailed
– Chart preparation, incorporation,
financing, growth, exit
Roadmapping Future
Development
20/12/10
20/12/10
20/12/10
20/12/10
Beyond Roadmapping – How to
Avoid Getting Stuck in a Rut!
http://w1.siemens.com/innovation/en/publikat
ionen/publications_pof/index.htm
20/12/10
20/12/10
Simple Example for Safety & Security - User Seg/Functions/Living
Spaces
Fu
nt n cti
g me o n
Se C ons nce
s er 3 rd
par u illa la te
U Cit me v e h is o
t y r r /
ym sec Su unis tive
an uri P ap ity
Po a g em t y C n t
lice ent s Ide
d
ren
Living Space
In t T
he s
off e nd
ice Tr
In t
he Fs
pris PO
on
On
the
str POF
eet s
In t Fs
he PO
ho
me
PO
Fs
20/12/10
20/12/10
Review
• Theory:
– Understand what is technology roadmapping
• Practice:
– Understand operation and technology roadmapping
(OTR) and how it is applied
• Some ideas on the future of roadmapping and
“beyond roadmapping”
20/12/10
Questions ?
Mike Ferrill
Tel: 6826 6186
Email: [email protected]
20/12/10
Useful references
Willyard and McClees (1987), ‘Motorola's Technology Roadmap process’, Research Management, Vol 30, No 5, pp13-19
EIRMA (1997) ‘Technology Roadmapping - delivering business vision’, Working Group Report No 52
Groenveld (1997) ‘Roadmapping integrates business and technology’, Research-Technology Management Journal, Vol 40, No. 5, pp48-
55
Kostoff, R.N. (1997), ‘Science and Technology Roadmaps’, Defense Technical Information Center,
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/kostoff/index.html
Garcia & Bray (1997) ‘Fundamentals of technology roadmapping’, Sandia National Lab, http://www.sandia/gov SAND97-0665
Phaal, Farrukh & Probert (2000) ‘Fast-Start Technology Roadmapping’, IAMOT Conference, February 2000, Orlando, Florida.
Kappel (2001) ‘Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future’, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol
18, pp39-50
Holmes, C., Ferrill, M. & Phaal, R. (2004) Reasons for Roadmapping: A Study of the Singaporean SME Manufacturing Sector. IEEE
International Engineering Management Conference 2004. Pan Pacific Hotel, Singapore 2004. Pp 292-296
Holmes & Ferrill (2005) ‘The application of operation and technology roadmapping (OTR) to aid Singaporean SMEs identity and select
emerging technologies’ Technological Forecasting & Social Change Special issue: Managing Emerging Technologies in Asia. Vol 72/3 pp
349-357
20/12/10