Three Jays Corporation: Diksha (PGP/23/204)

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Three Jays corporation

Diksha (PGP/23/204)
Overview
Brodie Arens is an MBA student and summer intern at Three Jays
Corporation.
Three Jays Corporation is a jam and jelly manufacturer in
Michigan
Brodie's first internship assignment is to update the production
and inventory planning system. Initially, he begins by updating
the Economic Order Quantities (EOQ) and Reorder Points (ROP)
for each product. However, he soon learns that the formal
production planning system was being ignored by the workers on
the factory floor. Consequently, Brodie has to decide what should
be done with the system and how to implement his
recommendations.
Economic order quantity
 Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the ideal order quantity a company should purchase
to minimize inventory costs such as holding costs, shortage costs, and order costs.
 This case illustrates the 2 major types of errors that can occur when using Economic
Order Quantity (EOQ) as a tool in production scheduling. It can be used in an
inventory control or trade-off analysis section in a production and operations
management course or in a supply chain management course.
 Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) = sqrt(2SD/iC)
 Reorder Point Quantity (ROP) = 3D/52

where D=demand
S=setup costs
i=Carrying cost %
C=unit cost
Using the five SKUS 2012 annual demand data the Company
EOQ and ROP will be as follows

• Weekly demand = monthly demand / 4


• When the data obtained from this calculation is compared with
the one of 2011, it comes out clearly that the annual demand has
been increasing.
Fixed and variable costs

Variable costs differ with the level of production, and thus the
value of EOQ should be obtained by putting into consideration
all the inputs which actively participated in the production.
Therefore, in this case, the costs attributable to the three works
should not be included in total costs. This leads to a reduction
of the total costs incurred by the three workers from the total
cost as follows.
63.7 – (1.29*3) = 59.80
Recalculation of EOQ & ROP

From the comparison of the two calculations, the cost of the two laid-
off workers should not be included in the calculation. This is because
their costs rise the quantity demanded. This is quite evident when the
EOQ figures are compared in the two table. Therefore, excluding their
costs, it will lead to reducing the quantity ordered by the company.

You might also like