Juvenile Delinquency and Crime Prevention (Autosaved)
Juvenile Delinquency and Crime Prevention (Autosaved)
Juvenile Delinquency and Crime Prevention (Autosaved)
Prevention
RHEM RICK N. CORPUZ, Ph. D, MS Crim, BS Crim
2nd Place, 2008 Criminology Licensure Examination
Definition of Terms:
Juvenile – a person who is not yet fully
developed; not yet an adult; have characteristics
of a youth or child; immature.
Youth – the condition or quality of being young;
an early period of development or existence; the
time of life between childhood and maturity.
Delinquency – any act, course or conduct, or
situation which might be brought before the court
and adjudicated whether in fact it comes to be
treated there or by some other resources or
indeed remains untreated.
Definition of Terms:
Juvenile delinquency – it is used to describe a
large number of disapproved behavior of children
and youths.
An act committed by minor that violates the penal
code of the government with authority over the area
in which the act occurred.
Youthful offender – it refers to a youth who is
found guilty by the court for the commission of an
offense after is 9th but before 18th birthday. CICL
Neglect – disregarding the physical, emotional or
moral needs of children or adolescents.
Definition of Terms:
Parental authority – it includes the rearing and
caring of children for civic consciousness and
efficiency and the development of their moral,
mental and physical character and well-being.
In Loco Parentis - Teachers, administrators, and
babysitters who are viewed as having some
temporary parental rights & obligations.
In re Gault (1967) – (US) - Case that determined
the Constitution requires a separate juvenile
justice system with certain standard procedures
and protections, but still not as many as in adult
systems.
Historical Development of Child
Welfare and Juvenile Justice
Code of Hammurabi – Oldest known code
for thousand years ago dating from 2270 B.C.
discussed runaways, children who disowned
their parents and sons who cursed their father
are severely being punished.
Roman Law and Canon (Church) law –
Approximately two thousand years ago, made
distinction between juveniles and adults
based on the notion “age of responsibility”
History....
Ancient Jewish Law – The Talmud specified
condition under which immaturity was to be
considered in imposing punishment. There was
no corporal punishment prior to puberty, which
was considered to be the age of twelve for
females and thirteen for males. No capital
punishment is to be imposed on those offenders
under twenty years of age. Similar leniency was
found among Moslems, where children under the
age of seventeen were typically exempt from the
death penalty.
History...
Codification of Roman Law – In fifth century B.C
this law resulted in the “Twelve Tables”, which
made it clear that children were criminally
responsible for violation of law and were to be
dealt with by same criminal justice system as
adults.
Children came to be classified as “infans,”
“proximus infantiae.” In general. “infans”
were not held criminally responsible, but those
approaching puberty who knew the difference
between right and wrong were held accountable.
History...
For much of Roman history, “infantia” meant the
inability to speak, but in the fifth century A.D. this
age is fixed at seven years and children under
that age were exempt from criminal liability. The
legal age of puberty was fixed at fourteen for
boys and twelve for girls: youth above these
ages were held criminally liable. For children
between the ages seven and puberty, liability
was based on their capacity to understand the
difference between right and wrong.
History...
Anglo Saxon Common Law (Law based on custom or
usage) - The distinction made between adult and juvenile
offenders in England at this time are most significant.
Under common law, children under the age of seven
were presumed incapable of forming criminal intent and
therefore were not subject to criminal sanctions. Children
between seven and fourteen were not subject to criminal
sanctions unless it could be demonstrated that they had
formed criminal intent, understood the consequences of
their actions, and could distinguish right from wrong
(Blackstone 1803, 22-24). Children over fourteen were
treated much the same as adults.
History...
Chancery or equity courts – Created by the king of
England, under the guidance of King’s chancellor.
Chancery courts were created to consider petitions of
those who needed special aid or intervention, such as
woman and children who needed protection and aid
because of divorce, the death of a spouse, or
abandonment, and to grant relief to such persons.
Through the chancery courts, the king exercise the
right of parens patria (parents of the country) by
enabling these courts to act in loco parentis (in the
place of parents) to provide necessary services for the
benefit of women and children. In other words, the
king, as ruler of his country, was to assume
responsibility for all those under his rule, to provide
parental care for children who had no parents, and to
assist women who required aid for any of the reasons
mentioned above.
History...
Although chancery courts did not normally deal
with youthful offenders, they did deal with
dependent or neglected youth as do juvenile
courts in the Unites States today. The
principle of parens patriae later became
central to development of juvenile court in
America.
History...
Law of King Aethelstan (924-939 A.D) – Old
English law provided penalties for children.
Any thief over 12 years old received a
punishment of death if he stole more than 12
pence, (later the amount was reduced to 8
pence). However, with the passage of time
the law was eased for children, and no one
under sixteen years could be put to death
unless he resisted or run away.
Statute of Artificers (1562) – Stated that children
of paupers could be involuntarily separated from
their parents and apprenticed to others.
Poor Law Act of 1601 – Provided for involuntary
separation of children from their impoverished
parents, and these children were then placed in
bondage to local residents as apprentices.
Statute of Artificers and Poor Law Act of 1601 were
placed in bondage to local residents as
apprentices.
Pope Clement XI – In 1704 in Rome, established the
Hospital of St. Michael’s, the first institution for the
treatment of juvenile offenders.
The stated purpose of the hospital was to correct and
instruct unruly youth so they might become useful
citizens.
Robert Young – In 1788 established the first private,
separate institution for youthful offenders in England.
The goal of the institution was to educate and instruct
in some useful trade or occupation the children of
convicts or such other infant poor as engaged in a
vagrant and criminal course of life.
Albert K. Cohen – The first man who attempted to
find out the process of beginning of the delinquent
subculture.
Kingwood Reformatory – This was established for
the confinement of the “hordes of unruly children who
infested the streets of new industrial towns” of
England.
New York Committee on Pauperism – In 1818, the
committee gave the term “Juvenile Delinquency” Its
first public recognition by referring it as a major cause
of pauperism.
1899 – The first Juvenile or “family”
court was established in Cook
County Illinois.
1899 – 1967 – This has been
referred to as the era of “socialized
juvenile justice”.
Types of Delinquent
Social – an aggressive youth who recents the authority
of anyone who make an effort to control his behavior.
Neurotic – he has internalized his conflicts and
preoccupied with his own feelings
Asocial – his delinquent at have a cold, brutal, ficious
quality for which the youth feels no humors.
Accidental – he is less identifiable in his character,
essentially socialize law abiding but too happens to be
at the wrong place at the wrong time and becomes
involved in some delinquent act not typical of his
general behavior.
Theories on Juvenile Delinquency
Factors to Deliquency
PREDISPOSING FACTOR
Inclinations or inherited propensities, which
cannot be, considered a criminal one unless there
is a probability that a crime will be committed
PRECIPITATING FACTOR
Elements which provokes crimes or factors that
are signified to the everyday adjustments of an
individual, like personal problems, necessities,
imitation, curiosity, ignorance, and diseases.
Different approach towards
delinquency
BIOGENIC APPROACH
Biogenic views the law-breaker as a person
whose misconduct is the result of faulty biology.
PSYCHOGENIC APPROACH
It tells us that the offender behaves as she or he
does in response to psychological pathology of
some kind. SOCIOGENIC APPROACH
SOCIOGENIC APPROACH
Sociogenic attributes the variations in
delinquency pattern to influence social structures.
I. CLASSICAL SCHOOL (Choice Theory) -
People choose to commit crime after
weighting the benefits and costs of their
actions. Crime can be deterred by certain,
severe and swift punishment.
Cesare Bonesana Marchese di Beccaria (1738-
1794), Milan, Italy
1. population trends,
2. religion, and
3. the nature of the family.
Ferri proposed a more elaborate classification of
criminal types:
1. the born or instinctive criminal,
2. the insane criminal,
3. the passionate criminal,
4. the involuntary criminal,
5. the occasional criminal, and
6. the habitual criminal.
The last two types were not innate criminals but rather
the products of unfortunate family or environmental
circumstances. By explaining criminal behavior on the
basis of social factors as well as inherited traits, Ferri
expanded the scope of criminology.
Raffaele Garofalo
Tarde believed that persons predisposed to
crime are attracted to criminal activity by the
example of other criminals. He felt that the
particular crimes committed and the methods
of committing those crimes are the products of
imitation.
Emile Durkheim, (1858 – 1917), France
Social-control theory - developed in
1960’s by American Criminologist Travis
Hirschi by emphasizing the acquisition of
values.
Resistance
V. PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY
Parricide
A child Murder
above 12 Infanticide
yrs up to Kidnapping & serious illegal detention
15yrs old- were the victims killed or raped robbery,
shall with homicide or, destruction arson, or
commits rape, carnaping where the driver or
occupant is killed or rape or offenses under
RA 9165- Dangerous Drugs
Punishable by more than 12 yrs of
imprisonment
shall be deemed a neglected child under
Presidential Decree No. 603, as amended, and
shall be mandatorily placed in a special facility
within the youth care faculty or ‘Bahay Pag-
asa’ called the Intensive Juvenile Intervention
and Support Center (IJISC).
SEC. 20-B. Repetition of Offenses
rrnc/2012
Thank you very much!