MGT Lec 7, 8 and 9 - Organizational Structure Design
MGT Lec 7, 8 and 9 - Organizational Structure Design
MGT Lec 7, 8 and 9 - Organizational Structure Design
Organizational
Design
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-1
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Designing Organizational Structure
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-3
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Designing Organizational Structure
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-4
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Organizational Structure
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-5
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-6
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
• Functional Departmentalization
• Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and people
with common skills, knowledge and orientations
• Coordination with functional areas
• In-depth specialization
− Disadvantages:
• Poor communication across functional areas
• Limited view of organizational goals
Plant Manager
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-7
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
• Product Departmentalization
− Advantages:
• Allows specialization in particular products and services
• Managers can become experts in their industry
• Closer to customers
− Disadvantages:
• Duplication of functions
• Limited view of organizational goals
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-8
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
• Product
Departmentalization Bombardier, Ltd.
Industrial Equipment
Division
Bombadier-Rotax
Copyright (Gunskirchen)
Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Copyright © 2014 Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-9
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
• Geographic Departmentalization
− Advantages:
• More effective and efficient handling of specific regional issues that
arise
• Serve needs of unique geographic markets better
− Disadvantages:
• Duplication of functions
• Can feel isolated from other organizational areas
Vice President
for Sales
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-10
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
• Process Departmentalization
− Advantages:
• More efficient flow of work activities
− Disadvantages:
• Duplication of functions
• Limited view of organizational goals
Plant
Superintendent
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-11
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Departmentalization
• Customer Departmentalization
− Advantages:
• Customers’ needs and problems can be met by specialists
− Disadvantages:
• Can only be used with certain types of products
Director
of Sales
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-12
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Chain of Command
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-13
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Authority (cont.)
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-14
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 11-5
Line Versus Staff Authority
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-15
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Responsibility and Unity of Command
1 1 1
Organizational Level
2 4 8
3 16 64
4 64 512
5 256 4,096
6 1,024
7 4,096
Span of 4 Span of 8
Operatives = 4,096 Operatives = 4,096
Managers (levels 1-6) = 1,365 Managers (levels 1-4) = 585
Centralization and Decentralization
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-20
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Factors that influence the amount of centralization & decentralization
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-21
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Formalization
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-22
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Formalization is the extent to which an organization's policies, procedures,
job descriptions, and rules are written and explicitly
articulated. Formalized structures are those in which there are many written
rules and regulations
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-23
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Mechanistic and Organic Structures
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-24
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Mechanistic and Organic Structures
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-25
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 11-8 Mechanistic Versus
Organic Organizations
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-26
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contingency Factors Affecting
Structural Choice
• Structural Contingency Factors
– Top managers of most organizations typically put
a great deal of thought into designing an
appropriate structure. What is the appropriate
structure depends on four contingency variables
• Strategy & Structure
• Size & Structure
• Technology & Structure
• Environmental uncertainty & structure
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-27
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contingency Factors Affecting
Structural Choice
• Strategy and Structure
– Changes in corporate strategy should lead to changes in an
organization’s structure that support the strategy
– Certain structural designs work best with different
organizational strategies
– Strategy focuses on innovation, cost minimization and
imitation
• Innovation - Pursuing competitive advantage through
meaningful and unique innovations favors an organic
structuring.
• Cost minimization - Focusing on tightly controlling costs
requires a mechanistic structure for the organization.
• Imitation - Minimizing risks and maximizing profitability by
copying market leaders requires both organic and
mechanistic elements in the organization’s structure.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-28
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contingency Factors (cont.)
• Size and Structure
- Size affects structure at a decreasing rate
- As an organization grows larger, its structure tends to
change from organic to mechanistic with increased
specialization, departmentalization, centralization, and
rules/regulations.
- Once there are around 2,000 employees in an
organization, it’s already fairly mechanistic. Adding another
500 employees won’t impact the structure much. On the
other hand, adding 500 employees to an organization with
only 300 employees is likely to make it more mechanistic.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-29
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contingency Factors (cont.)
• Technology and Structure
− Organizations adapt their structures to their technology.
– Woodward’s classification of firms based on the complexity of the
technology employed:
– Unit production of single units or small batches
– Mass production of large batches of output
– Process production in continuous process of outputs
– Routine technology = mechanistic organizations
– Non-routine technology = organic organizations
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-30
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contingency Factors (cont.)
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-31
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Traditional Organizational Designs
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-32
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 11-10
Traditional Organizational Designs
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-33
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Adaptive
Organizational
Design
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-34
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contemporary Organizational Designs
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-35
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 12-1 Contemporary
Organizational Designs
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-36
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 12-2
Example of a Matrix Organization
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-37
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contemporary Organizational
Designs (cont.)
• Project Structure - an organizational structure
in which employees continuously work on
projects. As one project is completed,
employees move on to the next project
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-38
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contemporary Organizational
Designs (cont.)
• Virtual Organization -
an organization that
consists of a small
core of full-time
employees and
outside specialists
temporarily hired as
needed to work on
projects.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-39
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contemporary Organizational
Designs (cont.)
• Network Organization - an organization that uses
its own employees to do some work activities and
networks of outside suppliers to provide other
needed product components or work processes.
• This organizational form is sometimes called a
modular organization by manufacturing firms.
• Such an approach allows organizations to
concentrate on what they do best by contracting out
other activities to companies that do those activities
best.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-40
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Contemporary Organizational
Designs (cont.)
• Learning Organization - an organization that has
developed the capacity to continuously learn, adapt,
and change
• It is an organizational mindset rather than a specific
organizational design.
A Final Thought
No matter what structural design managers choose for
their organizations, the design should help employees to
do their work in the best – the most efficient and effective
– way they can. The structure should aid and facilitate
organizational members as they carry out organization’s
work.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-41
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Exhibit 12-1 Contemporary
Organizational Designs (cont.)
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-42
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Common Organizational Designs
• Characteristics of a Learning Organization
Organizational Design
• Boundaryless
• Teams
• Empowerment
Organizational Culture
Information Sharing
• Strong Mutual Relationships The • Open
• Sense of Community
• Caring
Learning • Timely
• Trust Organization • Accurate
Leadership
• Shared Vision
• Collaboration
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Pearson©Education,
2012 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 11-43
Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall