Cha 11 Religion and Science
Cha 11 Religion and Science
Cha 11 Religion and Science
- GROUP 6
Group Members:
• Supriya Rayamajhi
• Shristy Satyal
• Ragini Raut
• Shashwat Singh Rupakheti
• Pragati Shakya
Author’s Biography
Alfred North Whitehead (1861 A.D -1978 A.D),born in Ramsgate,
England
Counted among greatest philosophers and mathematicians of 20th
century
Teaching career in reputable universities and colleges ,expanding from
England to United States
England: Trinity college (Sr. lecturer) & Imperial College of Science
and Technology (professor)
United states: Harvard University (professor)
Background of expertise and knowledge of different fields such as mathematics
and philosophy
Unlike many scholars, his knowledge was not concentrated in only one subject
matter and he was flexible making forays into different subject matters
Work of his being technical, available to those with special training only
Later works of philosophy directed towards affecting a more general yet
reasonably well-educated group of readers
An atheist who started to believe in God only later in life
Introduction
A section from the book titled “Science and the Modern World” published in 1925
A.D
Addresses controversy surrounding religion and science apparent after the
publication of “Origin of Species”, a book written by Darwin through a scientific
lens
People torn between choosing religion or science
Tries to soften the disagreements between these two powerful forces with his
explanation that put things in perspective
To be read with an open mind without leaning towards any one of the two subject
matters to process the writers thoughts correctly
Summary
-SHRISTY SATYAL
In formal logic, contradiction is a signal of defeat, but in
evolution of real knowledge it is a progress, “Let both grow
together until the harvest.”
Itis easy to find a theory which is logical and considers
important facts, if we are to disregard half of the evidence by
calling it a nonsense
To consider the whole of the evidence, even contradictory seems
easy, but is difficult to follow
A reason for such difficulty is our tendency to act before thinking
We adopt with the different ideas suitable for different
spheres
Theses ideas are to be trusted, if we find them generally
adequate
These ideas are inherited and followed as tradition
Traditions are ever changing, sometimes growing,
sometimes fading the other times transforming, due to the
urge for critical reasoning.
The religious influence has been gradually decreasing in the
Europe
People
are simplifying religion to make their life
comfortable
Two possible causes can be suggested for such decline in the
religious influence
One of them is the hesitance of religion to modify its ideas
or principles
Religious thinkers focus on defense rather than progress
The
modification of vital principle are always followed by
some struggle, distress or anathema
This type of psychology towards changing for progress has
destroyed the intellectual authority of religious thinkers.
In contrast, science has always considered the modification of its
idea as a triumph. When Darwin or Einstein come up with new
ideas we do not consider it as a defeat because old ideas are
given up.
If religion is to show same spirit towards the progressive change,
it could regain its old power
Though religious principle are considered eternal, its expressions
needs to be continually developed
This kind of evolution will allow the religion to separate
itself from imaginative picture of previous world or
imperfect science and to grow independently
The next reason for the fall of the religious influence in
people’s life is due failure to understand true meaning of
religion
Religionhas been forced to be seen as something to fear. It
was an instrument used by the cruel and tyrant leaders that
could raise their fear among people
Another definition of religion is the reaction of human nature
to its search of god
But again we are critical towards representation of god under
the aspect of power
Thiscritical view has risen due to science, our psychology is
highly influenced by science thus such expression of religion
are weakening
We today have deduced the Religion as some conduct leading
to comfortable life
But Religion is a vision of something beyond and within the passing
flux , something which is real and we are yet to explore
The religious visions are expanding, they fade and they reoccur, they
renew themselves with added richness and purity on content
The power of God is the worship he inspires, never forces or
overrules us, instead it helps us to gain understanding
Religion is an adventure towards unattainable, not a rule of safety
Interpretation
-SHASHWAT RUPAKHETI
Religion vs Science
Religion – Ethics and
Aesthetic Values
Science – Distinct set
of rules and Based on
Experiments.
Science is more progressive than religion