How To Write An Policy Brief
How To Write An Policy Brief
How To Write An Policy Brief
Paper
Miruna Troncota, PhD.
How to Approach Writing a Policy Brief
Structure and Writing Style
Problems to Avoid
Policy memo/ policy paper
definition
Policy brief writing assignments are intended to promote the following learning outcomes:
Help students learn how to write academically rigorous, persuasive papers about a
specific “real-world” issue,
Learn how to choose and craft a document’s content based on the needs of a
particular audience [rather than for a general readership],
Prepare students about how to write effectively in non-academic settings,
Teach students to be client-oriented and to better anticipate the assumptions and
concerns of their targeted readership, and
Enable students to create original work that synthesizes their research into a succinctly
written document advocating change or a specific course of action.
A POLICY PAPER IS NOT AN ACADEMIC
PAPER
You should not approach writing a policy brief (also knows as memo) like you
would an academic research paper.
Yes, there are certain commonalities in how the content is presented [e.g., a
well-written problem statement], but the overarching objective of a policy
memo is not to discover or create new knowledge.
It is focused on providing a pre-determined group of readers the rationale for
choosing a particular policy alternative or specific course of action.
In this sense, most policy memos possess a component of advocacy and
policy advice intended to promote evidence-based dialog about an issue.
Academic papers are focused on showing what you know. Policy memos are
focused on what you do with what you know in the real world, not I the
abstract theoretical debates.
Focus and Objectives
The visual impact of your brief affects the reader’s ability to grasp
your ideas quickly and easily.
Include a table of contents and list of figures and charts, if
necessary. Subdivide the text using clear and descriptive headings
to guide the reader. Incorporate devices such as capitalization,
bold text, and bulleted items but be consistent, and don’t go crazy;
the purpose is to facilitate access to specific sections of the paper
for successive readings.
If it is difficult to find information in your document, policy makers
will not use it.
Practical and Feasible
Provide specific criteria to assess either the success or failure of the policies you are
recommending. As much as possible, this criteria should be derived from your cost/benefit
analysis. Do not hide or under-report information that does not support your policy
recommendations. Just as you should note limitations in an original research study, a policy
memo should describe the weaknesses of your analysis. Be straightforward about it because
doing so strengthens your arguments and it will help the reader to assess the overall impact of
recommended policy changes.
NOTE: Technically, your policy brief could argue for maintaining the status quo. However, the
general objective of policy memos is to examine opportunities for change and describe the risks
of on-going complacency. If you choose to argue for maintaining the current policy trajectory,
be concise in identifying and systematically refuting all relevant policy options. Summarize why
the outcomes of maintaining the status quo are preferable to any alterative policy options.
How to organize a policy brief
The contents of a policy brief can be organized in a variety of ways. Below is a general
template adapted from the
“Policy Memo Requirements and Guidelines, 2012-2013 edition”
published by the Institute for Public Policy Studies at the University of Denver and from
suggestions made in the book, A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to
More Effective Problem-Solving [Eugene Bardach. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
2012] .
I. Cover Page
This section is where you explain in detail how you examined the issue
and, by so doing, persuade the reader of the appropriateness of your
analysis. This is followed by a description of how your analysis
contributes to the current policy debate. It is important to
demonstrate that the policy issue may be more complex than a basic
pro versus con debate. Very few public policy debates can be
reduced to this type of rhetorical dichotomy. Be sure your analysis is
thorough and takes into account all factors that may influence
possible strategies that could advance a recommended set of
solutions.
V. Proposed Solutions
Write a brief review of the specific solutions you evaluated, noting the criteria
by which you examined and compared different proposed policy alternatives.
Identify the stakeholders impacted by the proposed solutions and describe in
what ways the stakeholders benefit from your proposed solution.
Focus on identifying solutions that have not been proposed or tested
elsewhere.
Offer a contrarian viewpoint that challenges the reader to take into account a
new perspective on the research problem. Note that you can propose
solutions that may be considered radical or unorthodox, but they must be
realistic and politically feasible.
VI. Strategic Recommendations
Solutions are just opinions until you provide a path that delineates how
to get from where you are to where you want to go. Describe what you
believe are the best recommended courses of action ["action items"].
In writing this section, state the broad approach to be taken, with
specific practical steps or measures that should be implemented. Be
sure to also state by whom and within what time frame these actions
should be taken.
Conclude by highlighting the consequences of maintaining the status
quo [or if supporting the status quo, why change at this time would be
detrimental]. Also, clearly explain why your strategic recommendations
are best suited for addressing the current policy situation.
VI. Limitations