2019 Acute PE Slide-Set For Web

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 59

Acute pulmonary thrombo-embolism

DR PRAGNESH SHAH
Interventional cardiologist
• The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism should be sought actively in
patients with respiratory symptoms unexplained by an alternative
diagnosis. The symptoms of pulmonary embolism are nonspecific;
therefore, a high index of suspicion is required, particularly when a
patient has risk factors for the condition.
Indicators of PE
• Travel of 4 hours or more in the past month
• Surgery within the last 3 months
• Malignancy, especially lung cancer
• Current or past history of thrombophlebitis
• Trauma to the lower extremities and pelvis during the past 3 months
• Smoking
• Central venous instrumentation within the past 3 months
• Stroke, paresis, or paralysis
• Prior pulmonary embolism
• Heart failure
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
• A hypercoagulation workup should be performed if no obvious cause
for embolic disease is apparent. This may include screening for
conditions such as the following:
• Antithrombin III deficiency
• Protein C or protein S deficiency
• Lupus anticoagulant
• Homocystinuria
• Occult neoplasm
• Connective tissue disorders
• The PIOPED study reported the following incidence of common
symptoms of pulmonary embolism [35] :
• Dyspnea (73%)
• Pleuritic chest pain (66%)
• Cough (37%)
• Hemoptysis (13%)
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
• In patients with recognized pulmonary embolism, the incidence of physical signs has been reported as
follows:
• Tachypnea (respiratory rate >16/min) - 96%
• Rales - 58%
• Accentuated second heart sound - 53%
• Tachycardia (heart rate >100/min) - 44%
• Fever (temperature >37.8°C [100.04ºF]) - 43%
• Diaphoresis - 36%
• S3 or S4 gallop - 34%
• Clinical signs and symptoms suggesting thrombophlebitis - 32%
• Lower extremity edema - 24%
• Cardiac murmur - 23%
• Cyanosis - 19%
inINI
• D DIMER
• Echocardiography
• CT pulmonary angiography
• When clinical prediction rule results indicate that the patient has a
low or moderate pretest probability of pulmonary embolism, D-dimer
testing may be the next step. [3
• D-dimer testing is most reliable for excluding pulmonary embolism in
younger patients who have no associated comorbidity or history of
venous thromboembolism and whose symptoms are of short
duration. [4] However, it is of questionable value in patients who are
older than 80 years, who are hospitalized, who have cancer, or who
are pregnant, because nonspecific elevation of D-dimer
concentrations is common in such patients.
• D-dimer testing should not be used when the clinical probability of
pulmonary embolism is high, because the test has low negative
predictive value in such cases. [50]

You might also like