The Social and Value Dimensions of Technology
The Social and Value Dimensions of Technology
The Social and Value Dimensions of Technology
Dimensions of Technology
Presented by: Group 5
- It’s the making and using of tools. Humans often been called tool making beings.
- technology is the application of science to the solution of practical problems.
- It is the best understood as a system composed of physical objects and tools,
knowledge, inventors, operators, repair people, managers, government regulators
and others.
-Holds that technological development has a life of its own, an internal logic that
cannot be controlled by individual humans or even the whole society.
-A technology that can be developed usually will be developed, and a technology
that can be put to some use almost always will be put to that use.
Technological Optimism
-Technological optimism is the view that the effects of technology on human
well-being are almost altogether good.
-Technology enables us to provide for our basic needs and even some luxuries,
and it does so without our having to spend all of our waking hours merely trying
to survive.
-Even if technology does have some negative effects, such as pollution and harm
to the environment, the overall effects of technology are overwhelmingly on the
positive side.
Technological Pessimism
Technological pessimism takes a more
negative view of the effects of technology on
human life
Even though many technological pessimists
say they do not want to be as simply against
technology, there are much more likely to point
out the undesirable aspects of technological
development
The first theme is that technology is associated with a dominating , controlling
frame of mind, obsessed with achieving ever efficiency, that harms the
environment and obscures certain aspects of human experience, especially the
aesthetic and spiritual aspects.
•Those who collect personal date should ensure the security and
integrity of personal data system
Should Software Be Protected?
Utilitarian One
It promotes the progress of technology. The U.S. Constitution gives a utilitarian argument of this type when it authorizes Congress
‘‘to promote the progress of science and the useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right
to their respective writings and discoveries. There is a factual disagreement on what policy most effectively promotes
against granting legal protection to software granting legal protection tends to increase the priceand may reduce the quality of
This view starts with the idea that the first and most important thing we own is our own body. We can, however, ‘‘mix’’ the labor of
our bodies with other things in nature that are unowned or purchased from the former owners and thereby establish our ownership
of them as well. For example, if a pioneer clears unowned land and plants crops on it, he has mixed his labor with the land and can
claim ownership of it. Similarly, if a person begins with basic ideas of science and logic that are common property and thus in a
sense unowned, and then adds to them her intellectual labor so that she produces a new computer program, then she may lay claim
to ownership of that program. She has mixed her labor with unowned property to produce the program and therefore may
legitimately claim to ‘‘own’’ the program. In a slight modification of this story, if she mixes her intellectual labor with the
Two principal options have been proposed for protecting intellectual property: copyrights and patents.
The peculiar nature of software, however, makes both of these options problematic. Software does not fit the paradigm or
typical case of either something that should be copyrighted or something that should be patented. In some ways, software is
. A program is, after all, written in a ‘‘language’’ and has a logical sequence like a story or a play
Table
THE SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS
OF
TECHNOLOGY
The Social Interaction of Technology and society
So far, we have considered primarily the influence of technology on society and the social policy
issues that such influence creates. However, in contrast to technological determinism, most scholars
believe that social forces also influence the direction of technological development so that the truth
seems to be that there is two-way causal interaction between technology and society:
Technology
Influences
Society
Society Influences
the Development
of Technology
Agricultural Machinery
Transportation
From the commonsense standpoint, this may be the most plausible
position. There are many examples that influences on technology.
Examples:
social
political
economic
Science and Technology Studies:
Some critics of technology have noted that these features may not be essential to technology itself.
Technologies can be designed that stress sustainability, the use of renewable resources, and minimal pollution.
Technologies can also serve to promote human community rather than fracture it. If modern technology destroys or
makes irrelevant such traditional focal things as the fireplace, it can replace them by others. Computerized networks
for those with AIDS or with a thousand other interests can provide a focus for activities. Urban and housing design
can provide humane living spaces that allow greater access to others and to the natural world. Running shoes and
backpacking equipment can enable us to again establish access to the natural world. The advance of technology does
not necessarily destroy values that we consider of great importance, such as a relationship to the natural world and
focused human activities. It does, however, change the forms and contexts in which these activities take place. It is
not too much to ask engineers to think about these issues, as many engineers are certainly doing. Such thought can
lead to creative designs and a more humanly satisfying life.
Conclusion:
Engineering as
Social Experiment
There are several analogies between engineering and experimentation
First, engineering works—whether consumer products, bridges, or buildings—have
experimental subjects, like scientific experiments. In engineering, however, the subjects
are the public who utilize the products of engineering.
Second, as in any experiment, there is always an element of uncertainty about the outcome.
Engineers never know for sure how well a new automobile will perform on the road, or whether a
new building will withstand a hurricane. Yet, there is a necessity of gaining new knowledge,
which can only come by experimentation. Only by innovation can technology advance.
Third, like experimenters, engineers must assume responsibility for their experiments. They
must think about the possible consequences, both good and bad, and attempt to eliminate as
many bad consequences as possible.