Seminar On Alternative To Animal Screening Procedure, in Vitro Models, Molecular Biology Technique
Seminar On Alternative To Animal Screening Procedure, in Vitro Models, Molecular Biology Technique
Seminar On Alternative To Animal Screening Procedure, in Vitro Models, Molecular Biology Technique
Most scientists and governments say they agree that animal testing
should cause as little suffering as possible, and that alternatives to
animal testing need to be developed.
The "three Rs" first described by Russell and Burch in 1959, are
guiding principles for the use of animals in research in many countries:
Replacement refers to the preferred use of non-animal methods over
animal methods whenever it is possible to achieve the same scientific
aim.
Reduction refers to methods that enable researchers to obtain
comparable levels of information from fewer animals, or to obtain
more information from the same number of animals.
Refinement refers to methods that alleviate or minimize potential
pain, suffering or distress, and enhance animal welfare for the animals
still used.
Two major alternatives to in vivo animal testing are in vitro
cell culture techniques and in silico computer simulation.
However, some claim they are not true alternatives since
simulations use data from prior animal experiments and
cultured cells often require animal derived products, such as
serum.
Others say that they cannot replace animals completely as
they are unlikely to ever provide enough information about
the complex interactions of living systems.
Other alternatives, not subject to this criticism, involve the
use of humans for skin irritancy tests and donated human
blood for pyrogenicity studies.
Another alternative is so-called microdosing, in which the
basic behaviour of drugs is assessed using human volunteers
receiving doses well below those expected to produce whole-
body effects.
Origin
In 1954, Charles Hume, founder of the Universities Federation for
Animal Welfare (UFAW) made an original proposal for the Three Rs
to the UFAW to take in consideration alternatives for animal testing
and change scientific study in laboratory animal experiments.
Committee under the chairmanship of Sir Peter Medawar, the
Nobel prize-winning immunologist, along with Christine Stevens,
founder of the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) in the U.S, and
William Lane-Petter, the Secretary of the Research Defense Society
of Great Britain provided financial support and managed the project
to publish the concept of animal testing alternatives. The
microbiologist R.L. Burch and the zoologist W.M.S. Russell were
chosen to publish the work. "The Principles of Humane
Experimental Technique" was published in London in 1959, and the
book defined animal testing alternatives as “The Three R's:
Refinement, Reduction, and Replacement.”
Types
Cell culture
Cell culture is currently the most
successful, and promising, alternative to
animal use. For example, cultured cells
have been developed to create
monoclonal antibodies, prior to this
production required animals to undergo a
procedure likely to cause pain and
distress.
MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY PRODUCTION
Skin corrosion
Skin irritation
A skin patch test has been designed and is used in Canada
to measure development of rashes, inflammation, swelling
or abnormal tissue growth on human volunteers. Unlike
corrosives, irritants cause only reversible skin damage.
Pyrogenicity
Pyrogens are most often pharmaceutical products or
intravenous drugs that may cause inflammation or fever
when they interact with immune system cells. This
interaction can be quickly and accurately tested in vitro
using donated human blood.
Computer simulation
The northern blot is used to study the expression patterns of a specific type
of RNA molecule as relative comparison among a set of different samples
of RNA.
It is essentially a combination of denaturing RNA gel electrophoresis, and a
blot.
In this process RNA is separated based on size and is then transferred to a
membrane that is then probed with a labeled complement of a sequence of
interest.
The results may be visualized through a variety of ways depending on the
label used; however, most result in the revelation of bands representing the
sizes of the RNA detected in sample.
The intensity of these bands is related to the amount of the target RNA in
the samples analyzed.
The procedure is commonly used to study when and how much gene
expression is occurring by measuring how much of that RNA is present in
different samples.
It is one of the most basic tools for determining at what time, and under
what conditions, certain genes are expressed in living tissues.
Western blotting