Instructional Materials For Social Studies
Instructional Materials For Social Studies
Instructional Materials For Social Studies
Materials for
Social Studies
WMSU
Approaches,
Strategies, and
techniques in teaching
Social Studies
WMSU
• Teaching Approach- It is a set of principles, beliefs, or
ideas about the nature of learning which is translated into
the classroom.
• IV. Procedure
• Purposing
• Planning
• Executing
• Judging
• V. Assignment
Deductive Method
• IV. Pamamaraan
• A. Paghahandang tuntunin
• B. Pagpapaliwanagngtuntunin
• C. PagbibigayngHalimbawa
• D. Paglilitis
• V. Pagbibigay-Halaga
• VI. Takdang-Aralin
•
Inductive Method
• The teacher presents students with many examples
showing how the concept is used. The intent is for
students to “notice” by the way of the examples , how the
concept works.
Steps
• IV. Pamamaraan
• A. Panimulang Gawain
• 1. Balik –aral (optional)
• 2. Pagganyak
• 3. Pag-aalis ng Balakid
• B. Paglilinang Gawain
• 1. Paglalahad
• 2. Pagtatalakay
• C. Paglalahat
• 1. Paggamit
• 2. Pagbibigay-halaga
• V. Takdang-Aralin
Moral Dilemma Method
• Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-87) was a well know theorist in
the field of moral development. Of his moral dilemmas the
most famous is Heinz’s Dilemma asking questions to
probe a person reasoning and specific course of action.
• Lawrence Kohlberg used scenarios that involved ethical
decisions. By asking what one would do in this situation,
he identified stages of moral development.
• A useful tool for any discussion on an ethical topic or
decision. Requires students to probe and extend thought
and discussion regarding any ethical issue presented in
the classroom.
Characteristics
• Open-ended approach: There is no single "right answer."
The goal is not to reach agreement but to critically
discuss the reasons used to justify a recommended
action.
• The emphasis is on why some reasons may be more
appropriate than others
• Free exchange of ideas: Students should feel
comfortable in expressing their thoughts. Each student
should have an opportunity to contribute to the discussion
within a nonjudgmental atmosphere
• Student to student interaction: The conversation is primarily
between student and student, not teacher and student. The
teacher uses questions to guide the discussion and to
encourage students at adjacent stages of moral reasoning to
challenge one another. Lecture or recitation should be avoided.
• Development of listening and verbal skills: Each student
should be intimately engaged in the discussion activity, building
and expanding on one another's ideas as well as examining
each response critically.
• Focus on reasoning: Reasons are to emphasize the
prescriptive "should" rather than the "would" arguments.
• Dilemmas produce conflict: Conflict heightens student
involvement and interest and should have a personalized
meaning for the student. Resolution of internal conflict is a
precondition for advancement to higher stage reasoning.
Steps
• 1. Present the Dilemma
• Story, current event, movie, scientific dilemma, school, family or
• classroom issue
• 2. Ask focusing question
• 3. Generate positions
• 4. Group students by positions
• 5. Present positions’ compelling arguments
• 6. Allow limited clarifying questions or comments
• 7. Allow position change
• 8. Present defensible scenario based on position
• 9. Reflection on values confronted and examined
Where do dilemmas come from
• Current events
• Literature
• Content areas
• Classroom issues
The Heinz Dilemma
• A woman has a rare form of cancer. There is a drug that
might save her. The drug costs $4,000 per dose. The sick
woman’s husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to
borrow money and tried every legal means, but he could
only get together about $2000. He asked the doctor
scientist who discovered the drug for a discount or to let
him pay later. The doctor refused.
• Should Heinz break into the laboratory to
steal the drug for his wife?
• Why or why not?
Scenario 2
• Heinz broke into the laboratory and stole the drug. The
next day the newspapers reported the break in and theft.
Brown, a police officer and friend of Heinz remembered
seeing Heinz last evening, behaving suspiciously near the
laboratory. Later that night, he saw Heinz running away
from the laboratory
• Should Brown report what he saw?
• Why or why not?
Scenario 3
• Brown reported what he saw. Heinz was arrested and
brought to court. If convicted, he faces up to two years’ in
jail. Heinz was found guilty.