Urban Land Use Theories

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Urban Land-

Use Theories
Three key theories
 Burgess – Concentric Zone

 Hoyt – Sector Model

 Harris and Ullman – Multiple Nuclei


Urban Land-Use Theories
Concentric Zone Theory

 Burgess (1925)
 Cities grow outwards from the
centre in a series of rings.
Concentric Zone Theory
Assumptions
 Timeframe 
 Older buildings in city
 1920’s centre
 Class conscious  Newer buildings at edge of
society city
 Housing segregated  Land values highest in city
centre
according to income
 Strong economic and
 Lack of transport ethnic segregation
infrastructure  Low income groups lack
transport and live close to
city centre.
 Cities develop on a flat
plain with equal access to
transport
Five Concentric Zones
 1) Central Business  3) Low Income
District Residential
 2) Transition and  4) Middle Income
Industry Residential
 low incomes  suburban estates- good
 oldest housing quality, gardens
 ghettos  5)
High Income
Residential / Commuter
 Small towns and villages
Problems with Burgess Model
 Old
 Doesn'tconsider car ownership
 Landscape not considered
 Impact that industry and transport
could have on land use not
considered.
 Zones are never as clear-cut
Hoyt’s Sector Model
 1939
 Sectors
radiating out from the CBD along
transport routes.
Sector Theory
 Timeframe  Assumptions
 Late 1930’s  Settlement develops
 Income and status along transport routes
divided society  Towns radiate out
from the CBD
 Housing areas
 Low-income and
reflect social
industrial areas lie
segregation next to each other
 Wealthy people
choose the best sites
Criticisms of Hoyt’s Theory
Old

Too general

In reality, most zones contain


more than one land-use

Doesn't consider the impact of


urban renewal schemes
Burgess ‘v’ Hoyt
Hoyt’s theory is based on
statistical data, so is less
open to the criticism that
Burgess received.
Harris and Ullman’s Multiple Nuclei
Theory
1945
As an urban area grows, it
develops around a number
of different business centres
or nuclei.
Multiple Nuclei Theory
 Assumptions;
 Modern cities more complex than suggested by
other theorists
 Each nucleus acts as a growth point
 Growth occurs outwards from each nucleus, until
they all merge into one large urban area
Multiple Nuclei Theory
 Mixture of Burgess and Hoyt

 Shows some land-uses attract more of the same,


for example industrial areas

 Some land-uses may deter others from locating


nearby, eg; housing is usually located away from
industrial areas
Criticisms of Multiple Nuclei Theory
Not an exact fit for all cities
and towns

Too complex

You might also like