Chapter 5 Urban Land-Use Theories

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Urban Land-

Use Theories
6th year Geography
Three key theories
 Burgess – Concentric Zone

 Hoyt – Sector Model

 Harris and Ullman – Multiple Nuclei


Urban Land-Use Theories
Concentric Zone Theory

 Burgess (1925)
 Cities grow outwards from the
centre in a series of rings.
Concentric Zone Theory
Assumptions
 Timeframe 
 Older buildings in city
 1920’s centre
 Class conscious  Newer buildings at edge of
society city
 Housing segregated  Land values highest in city
centre
according to income
 Strong economic and
 Lack of transport ethnic segregation
infrastructure  Low income groups lack
transport and live close to
city centre.
 Cities develop on a flat
plain with equal access to
transport
Five Concentric Zones
 1) Central Business  3) Low Income
District Residential
 2) Transition and  4) Middle Income
Industry Residential
 low incomes  suburban estates-
 oldest housing good quality, gardens
 ghettos  5) High Income
Residential / Commuter
 Small towns and
villages
Problems with Burgess Model
 Old
 Doesn'tconsider car ownership
 Landscape not considered
 Impact that industry and transport
could have on land use not
considered.
 Zones are never as clear-cut
Hoyt’s Sector Model
1939
Sectorsradiating out from the
CBD along transport routes.
Sector Theory
 Timeframe  Assumptions
 Settlement develops
 Late 1930’s
along transport routes
 Income and  Towns radiate out
status divided from the CBD
society  Low-income and
industrial areas lie
 Housing areas next to each other
reflect social  Wealthy people
segregation choose the best sites
Criticisms of Hoyt’s Theory
Old

Too general

In reality, most zones contain


more than one land-use

Doesn't consider the impact of


urban renewal schemes
Burgess ‘v’ Hoyt
Hoyt’s theory is based on
statistical data, so is less
open to the criticism that
Burgess received.
Harris and Ullman’s Multiple Nuclei
Theory
1945
As an urban area grows, it
develops around a number
of different business centres
or nuclei.
Multiple Nuclei Theory
Assumptions;
Modern cities more complex than
suggested by other theorists
Each nucleus acts as a growth point
Growth occurs outwards from each
nucleus, until they all merge into one
large urban area
Multiple Nuclei Theory
 Mixture of Burgess and Hoyt

 Shows some land-uses attract more of the same,


for example industrial areas

 Some land-uses may deter others from locating


nearby, eg; housing is usually located away from
industrial areas
Criticisms of Multiple Nuclei Theory
Not an exact fit for all cities
and towns

Too complex
Are these models relevant to
today’s cities??
 Have some relevance

 Now due to urban renewal schemes and


changes in society, high income residential
areas often exist close to the CBD

 Modern cities are expanding beyond these


models- Urban Sprawl
Exam Question
 Examine briefly one theoretical model
which attempts to explain the
development of land use zones in a
developed world city. (30 marks)

You might also like