The document discusses various moral dilemmas and ethics. It defines moral dilemmas as situations where there is a difficult choice between two equally undesirable options. It identifies three levels of moral dilemmas - personal, organizational, and structural. Personal dilemmas are resolved on an individual level, organizational involve social groups, and structural encompass institutions. The document also discusses that morality requires rational choice and impartial consideration of all parties, which animals and robots lack.
The document discusses various moral dilemmas and ethics. It defines moral dilemmas as situations where there is a difficult choice between two equally undesirable options. It identifies three levels of moral dilemmas - personal, organizational, and structural. Personal dilemmas are resolved on an individual level, organizational involve social groups, and structural encompass institutions. The document also discusses that morality requires rational choice and impartial consideration of all parties, which animals and robots lack.
The document discusses various moral dilemmas and ethics. It defines moral dilemmas as situations where there is a difficult choice between two equally undesirable options. It identifies three levels of moral dilemmas - personal, organizational, and structural. Personal dilemmas are resolved on an individual level, organizational involve social groups, and structural encompass institutions. The document also discusses that morality requires rational choice and impartial consideration of all parties, which animals and robots lack.
The document discusses various moral dilemmas and ethics. It defines moral dilemmas as situations where there is a difficult choice between two equally undesirable options. It identifies three levels of moral dilemmas - personal, organizational, and structural. Personal dilemmas are resolved on an individual level, organizational involve social groups, and structural encompass institutions. The document also discusses that morality requires rational choice and impartial consideration of all parties, which animals and robots lack.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 24
DR.
ARVELLA MEDINA – ALBAY
ETHICS INSTRUCTOR RECOGNIZE AND RECALL A MORAL EXPERIENCE DETECT A MORAL DILEMMA IDENTIFY THE THREE LEVELS OF MORAL DILEMMAS ACTIVITY: FOR INDIVIDUAL DILEMMAS: CASE DISCUSSION ON STUDENTS’ MORAL DILEMMAS DILEMMA REFERS TO A SITUATION IN WHICH A TOUGH CHOICE HAS TO BE MADE BETWEEN TWO OR MORE OPTIONS, ESPECIALLY MORE OR LESS EQUALLY UNDESIRABLE ONES NOT ALL DILEMMAS ARE MORAL DILEMMAS ETHICAL DILEMMAS Situations in which there is a choice to be made between TWO OPTIONS, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. MORAL DILEMMA INVOLVES CONFLICTS BETWEEN MORAL REQUIREMENTS In such cases, societal and personal ethical guidelines can provide no satisfactory outcome for the individual. Ethical dilemmas assume that the INDIVIDUAL will ABIDE by societal norms, such as codes of law or religious teachings, in order to make the choice ethically impossible. A. THE AGENT IS REQUIRED TO DO EACH OF TWO (OR MORE) ACTIONS B. THE AGENT CAN DO EACH OF THE ACTIONS; BUT THE AGENT CANNOT DO BOTH (OR ALL) OF THE ACTIONS IN A MORAL DILEMMA, THE AGENT THUS SEEMS CONDEMNED TO MORAL FAILURE; NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES, HE WILL DO SOMETHING WRONG, OR FAIL TO DO SOMETHING THAT HE OUGHT TO DO A. PERSONAL DILEMMAS PERSONAL DILEMMAS are those experienced and resolved on the personal level. Since many ethical decisions are personally made, many, if not most of, moral dilemmas fall under, or boil down to this level If a person makes conflicting promises, he faces moral conflict When an individual has to chose between life of a child who is about to delivered and the child’s mother, he faces ethical dilemma B. ORGANIZATIONAL DILEMMAS ORGANIZATIONAL DILEMMAS are refer to ethical cases encountered and resolved by social organizations Includes moral dilemmas in business, medical field, and public sector Life of a dying patient – shortened and unpreventable pain shl not be tolerated C. STRUCTURAL DILEMMAS STRUCTURAL DILEMMAS are moral dilemmas refers to cases involving network of institutions and operative theoretical paradigms Usually encompass multi-sectoral institutions and organizations, they maybe larger in scope and extent than organizational dilemma Prices of medicines in the Philippines ONLY HUMAN BEINGS ARE RATIONAL, AUTONOMOUS, AND SELF-CONSCIOUS ONLY HUMAN BEINGS CAN ACT MORALLY OR IMMORALLY ONLY HUMAN BEINGS ARE PART OF THE MORAL COMMUNITY ONE OF THE REASONS ANIMALS CANNOT BE TRULY ETHICAL IS THAT THEY ARE NOT REALLY AUTONOMOUS OR FREE. ROBOT, NO MATTER HOW BENEFICIAL ITS FUNCTIONS MAY BE, CANNOT BE SAID TO BE MORAL, FOR IT HAS NO FREEDOM OR CHOICE BUT TO WORK ACCORDING TO WHAT IS COMMANDED BASED ON ITS BUILT-IN PROGRAM MORALITY IS A QUESTION OF CHOICE PRACTICALLY, MORALITY IS CHOOSING ETHICAL CODES, VALUES, OR STANDARDS TO GUIDE US IN OUR DAILY LIVES PHILOSOPHICALLY, CHOOSING IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT FREEDOM MORALITY REQUIRES AND ALLOWS CHOICE THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE EVEN DIFFERENTLY FROM OUR FELLOWS. PEOPLE MAKE THE CHOICE TO GIVE TO CHARITIES, DONATE TIME AND MONEY TO SCHOOLS, MENTOR CHILDREN, OPEN BUSINESS, OR PROTEST AGAINST ANIMAL CRUELTY JAMES RACHELS holds that moral judgments must be backed by sound reasoning and that morality requires the Impartial considerations of all parties involved. Thus, submitted that reason and impartiality compose the “minimum conception” of morality, or as some put it, the minimum requirements of morality REASON As a requirement for morality entails that human feelings may be important in ethical decisions, but they ought to be guided by reason. Sound reasoning helps us to evaluate whether our feelings and intuitions about moral cases are correct and defensible IMPARTIALITY Involves the idea that each individual’s interests and point of view are equally important. Also called evenhandedness or fair-mindedness Impartiality is a principle of justice holding that decisions ought to be based on objective criteria, rather than on the basis of bias, prejudice, or preferring the benefit to one person over another for improper reasons PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS Micah had several friends including Diane and Ella. Diane has recently met and started dating a wonderful lad named Angelo. She is convinced this is a long term relationship. Unknown to Diane, Micah observed them at a restaurant several days ago and realized Angelo is the husband of her other friend Ella. Micah is deciding whether to tell Diane that Angelo is married when she receives a call from Ella. Ella suspects her husband is having an affair and since they and Ella share many friends and contacts, she asks if Micah has heard anything regarding an affair. To whom does Micah owe greater friendship to in this situation? No matter who she tells, she is going to end up hurting one, if not both friends. Does she remain silent and hope her knowledge is never discovered? Societal Dilemmas
A pregnant woman leading a group of people out of a cave
on a coast is stuck in the mouth of that cave. In a short time high tide will be upon them, and unless she is unstuck, they will all be drowned except the woman, whose head is out of the cave. Fortunately, (or unfortunately,) someone has with him a stick of dynamite. There seems no way to get the pregnant woman loose without using the dynamite which will inevitably kill her; but if they do not use it everyone will drown. What should they do? The mood at Baileyville High School is tense with anticipation. For the first time in many, many years, the varsity basketball team has made it to the state semifinals. The community is excited too, and everyone is making plans to attend the big event next Saturday night. Jeff, the varsity coach, has been waiting for years to field such a team. Speed, teamwork, balance: they've got it all. Only one more week to practice, he tells his team, and not a rule can be broken. Everyone must be at practice each night at the regularly scheduled time: No Exceptions.Brad and Mike are two of the team's starters. From their perspective, they're indispensable to the team, the guys who will bring victory to Baileyville. They decide-why, no one will ever know- to show up an hour late to the next day's practice. Jeff is furious. They have deliberately disobeyed his orders. The rule says they should be suspended for one full week. If he follows the rule, Brad and Mike will not play in the semifinals. But the whole team Joe is a fourteen-year-old boy who wanted to go to camp very much. His father promised him he could go if he saved up the money for it himself. So Joe worked hard at his paper route and saved up the forty dollars it cost to go to camp, and a little more besides. But just before camp was going to start, his father changed his mind. Some of his friends decided to go on a special fishing trip, and Joe's father was short of the money it would cost. So he told Joe to give him the money he had saved from the paper route. Joe didn't want to give up going to camp, so he thinks of refusing to give his father the money. In Europe, a woman was near death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid $400 for the radium and charged $4,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money and tried every legal means, but he could only get together about $2,000, which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying, and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said, "No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from if." So, having tried every legal means, Heinz gets desperate and considers breaking into the man's store to steal the drug for his wife. Judy was a twelve-year-old girl. Her mother promised her that she could go to a special rock concert coming to their town if she saved up from baby-sitting and lunch money to buy a ticket to the concert. She managed to save up the fifteen dollars the ticket cost plus another five dollars. But then her mother changed her mind and told Judy that she had to spend the money on new clothes for school. Judy was disappointed and decided to go to the concert anyway. She bought a ticket and told her mother that she had only been able to save five dollars. That Saturday she went to the performance and told her mother that she was spending the day with a friend. A week passed without her mother finding out. Judy then told her older sister, Louise, that she had gone to the performance and had lied to her mother about it. Louise wonders whether to tell their mother what Judy did Tony, a data analyst for a major casino, is working after normal business hours to finish an important project. He realizes that he is missing data that had been sent to his coworker Robert.Tony had inadvertently observed Robert typing his password several days ago and decides to log into Robert's computer and resend the data to himself. Upon doing so, Tony sees an open email regarding gambling bets Robert placed over the last several days with a local sports book. All employees of the casino are forbidden to engage in gambling activities to avoid any hint of conflict of interest. Tony knows he should report this but would have to admit to violating the company's information technology regulations by logging into Robert's computer. If he warns Robert to stop his betting, he would also have to reveal the source of his information. What does Tony do in this situation? Alan works in the claims department of a major hospital. Paperwork on a recent admission shows that a traumatic mugging caused the patient to require an adjustment in the medication she is prescribed to control anxiety and mood swings. Alan is struck by the patient's unusual last name and upon checking her employment information realizes she is one of his daughter's grade school teachers. Alan's daughter seems very happy in her school and he cannot violate patient confidentiality by informing the school of a teacher's mental illness but he is not comfortable with a potentially unstable person in a position of influence and supervision over his eight year old daughter. Can Alan reconcile these issues in an ethical manner? Knowing how to best resolve difficult moral and ethical dilemmas is never easy especially when any choice violates the societal and ethical standards by which we have been taught to govern our lives.