Sewer Shapes (M)
Sewer Shapes (M)
Sewer Shapes (M)
Selection Sufficient
of
Structurally
free board in
safe and
maximum
stable
discharge
Shapes
Easy
cleansing
and
maintenance
C
most used
Inner surface is smooth, hence the flow of sewage is uniform and there is no chance of deposition of suspended particles
Advantage
Disadvantage
-Easily manufactured
-Gives maximum area for a given parameter
-Most efficient since it gives greatest hydraulic mean -Self cleansing cannot be maintained at DWF
depth when running half/full conditions in combined system
-Economical since it utilizes minimum qualities of -Suitable only when variation of discharge is not large
material
- Less settlement of deposits due to uniform curvature
E 2D
D
Preferred for combined sewer
Over circular shape is that it gives higher velocity during low flow of the same
capacity
It is difficult to construct and less stable
It requires additional bedding of brick masonry or concrete to make it stable
Advantages
Disadvantages
-Provides slightly higher -Unstable as small end of egg is down and has to support
velocity for low flows over weight of upper broader section
circular sewer equal capacity -Difficult to construct
-Expensive as mole material required
-High construction cost
-Effective in combined system -Not self-cleansing in absence of adequate gradient
N
2D