Jones Law: The Philippine Autonomy Act of 1916 A Content and Context Analysis

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

JONES LAW

The Philippine Autonomy Act of 1916


A Content and Context Analysis
Historical Context of Jones Law
WHERE WHEN WHO
o United States o 1912 - the first o Authored by
Congress version of the law Representative
o Philippines was introduced but William Atkinson
failed to pass House Jones of Virginia, a
o 1914 - a modified bill democratic and a
was presented congressman
o 1916 - final version o Signed by President
of the bill was Woodrow Wilson
approved and signed
J. William Jones Pres. Woodrow Wilson
Historical Context of Jones Law
WHAT WHY
POLITICAL
• Legislative power was divided among Filipinos and American, • Strong longing of Filipinos to gain their independence from
called the Philippine Commission. The upper house consisted colonizers: “Hereafter nothing will be done without our
of American males, while the lower house consisted of consent, much less in defiance of our opposition.” (Quezon,
Filipinos. Executive power was exercised by the Governor- 1916)
General. • Some of the members of the United States Congress have
• The US Congress was Democratic-controlled during also favored the granting of practical autonomy or even
Governor-General Francis Burton Harisson’s term independence to the Philippines, resulting in a lengthy
debate and arguments among the members.
RELIGION
• Majority were Christians, a result of being colonized by
Spaniards for 333 years; there were also Non-Christians who
are comprised of ⅓ of the Philippine Archipelago
• Church and State were disestablished

SOCIAL
• Education and sanitation were encouraged and substantial
progress toward the training of Filipinos for self-
government was made
• The great majority of the people lived on the land or in
small villages, many were tenants on large estates
• Philippine population increased several times

ECONOMIC
• The production and export of sugar, copra, hemp, lumber and
gold were greatly increased.
• The great majority of the people lived on the land or in small
villages, many were tenants on large estates.
Historical Context of Jones Law
HOW PEOPLE VIEWED THIS BACK THEN HOW PEOPLE VIEWED THIS AT
PRESENT
o A step towards complete emancipation • Additional background information on
of the Filipino people (Manuel Quezon, the formation of the legislative body of
1916) because: the Philippines
• Philippine Legislature is completely • Shows us the eagerness of Filipinos to
elective and now consisting of Filipinos claim their freedom against colonization
• Expanded electoral suffrage • Equality is not evident during the
• Bill of rights period since only males are qualified to
• As the political aspects of the Filipinos vote and have the opportunity to be a
develop through their own Legislative member of the legislative body.
body, the economic and social
development becomes secured and
stable

o Filipinos were given a degree of


autonomy
o More responsibility in the hands of the
Filipino people
Historical Content of Jones Law
WHERE WHEN WHO
• “The o Passed by the • considered Philippine citizens
• Governor-General of the Philippine
Philippines” Congress of the Islands
or the United States • President of the United States
Philippine and became law • Philippine Legislature consisting of two
Islands on August 29, houses: Senate and House of
Representatives
• United States 1916. • qualified electors
Congress • Resident Commissioners to the United
States
• Vice-Governor of the Philippine Islands
• Auditor
• Deputy Auditor and Assistant
• Secretary of War
• Chief Justice and Associates Justices of
the Supreme Court
• Judges of the Court of First Instance of
the Philippine Islands
• Provincial and municipal officials
Historical Content of Jones Law
WHAT
PREAMBLE
“Where it is, as it has always been, the purpose of the people of the United States to withdraw their
sovereignty over Philippine Islands and to recognize their independence as soon as a stable government can
be established therein.”

CIVIL/HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 3 - Bill of Rights

PHILIPPINE LEGISLATURE
Section 7―Legislative Power to Change Laws
Section 8―General Legislative Power
Section 12―The Philippine Legislature
Section 17— Tenure of Senators and Representatives
Section 18— Organization of the Legislature and Privilege of Members
Section 20 ―The Resident Commissioners
Section 22.―The Executive Departments and the Legislature

ELECTION OF THE PHILIPPINE LEGISLATURE


Section 13 — Election and Qualification of Senators
Section 14— Election and Qualifications of Representatives
Section 15— Qualifications of Voters
Section 16— Senate and Representative Districts, and Appointive Senators and Representatives
Historical Content of Jones Law
WHAT
ECONOMIC
Section 9 ― Public Property and Legislation on Public Domain, Timber and Mining
Section 10 ― Laws on Tariff, Immigration and Coinage
Section 11 ―Taxes and Public Debts
Section 28 – Franchises

CITIZENSHIP
Section 2 - Philippine Citizenship and Naturalization

GOVERNMENT
Section 4 - Expenses of the Government
Section 21 ―The Governor-General
Section 22.―The Executive Departments and the Legislature
Section 23―The Vice-Governor
Section 24―The Insular Auditor
Section 26 – The Judiciary
Section 29 – Salaries
Section 30 – Salaries of Municipal and Provincial Officers

LAWS
Section 5 - Inapplicability of American Statutes
Section 6 - Continuance of Philippine Laws
Section 19 ― Procedure for Law-Making
Section 25 – Appeal from Auditor’s Decision
Section 27 – Cases Appealable to the United States Supreme Court
Section 31 – Continuance of Laws
Primary Sources

Jones, W. A. (1916, August 29). The Jones Law of 1916. Retrieved from
Official Gazette: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/the-
jones-law-of-
1916/?fbclid=IwAR1OufNOGp3vWaWrdw42IaH2Y37yKa4
opQvDCoC5hGj1Vdmqh85JX7AeTYo
Secondary and Tertiary Sources

Quezon, M.L., III., Barns, J.R., Albani, E.A., et al. (2007). Assembly of the nation:
A centennial history of the House of Representatives of the Philippines
1907-2007. Quezon City, Metro Manila: House of Representatives of the
Philippines

Editor: Cullather, N., Managing nationalism : United States National Security


Council documents on the Philippines, 1953- 1960.

Robertson, J.A., (1916) The Effect in the Philippines of the Senate“Organic


Act”. The Journal of Race Development 6(4) 370-387. DOI:
10.2307/29738167

Onorato, M.P. (1966). The Jones Act and the Establishment of a Filipino Government,
1916-1921. Philippine Studies 14(3) 448- 459. Retrieved from
https://0www.jstor.org.ustlib.ust.edu.ph/stable/pdf/42
720121.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fbasic_SYC-
4653%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3Ade34f0a5ba9ce01593f9a
522a7c5d8fb

You might also like