Cooling Tower
Cooling Tower
Cooling Tower
2
Objectives & Goals
Objectives Goal
Evaluate the performance of an To apply thermodynamic
induced draft cooling tower. fundamental concepts to
determine the performance and
Perform energy balance of fluid
effectiveness of induced draft
through into the system.
cooling towers.
The use of thermodynamic tables
and the psychrometric chart to
determine the states of measured
parameters.
3
Introduction
- drg
4
Theory
5
Theory (Cont.)
Procedure:
- Moist Air Inlet:
- Temperature
- Dew-Point
- Dry-Bulb
- Wet-Bulb
Figure 4a: Moist air inlet
- Relative Humidity
9
Materials & Method (Cont.)
10
Materials & Method (Cont.)
- Warm Water Inlet/ Cooled Water
Exit/ Makeup Water:
- Temperature
- Electrical Panel:
- Voltage (Volts)
- Phase to Phase Figure 5: Warm water inlet
- Line to Line
- Current (Amps)
- Line 11
Materials & Method (Cont.)
- Heat Load:
- 𝑄𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 𝑚ሶ 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 ∗ (ℎ1 − ℎ2 )
- Effective Power:
- 𝑃𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 3 ∗ 𝑉𝐿 ∗ 𝐼𝐿 ∗ 𝑝𝑓 ∗ 𝜂𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟
13
Results & Discussion
- Values for approach, range and efficiency for the cooling towers
U072249004 and U072249003, respectively.
Approach 3.67±0.2 Approach 3.02±0.3
14
Results & Discussion (Cont.)
- Velocity profile for the air velocity distribution at the fan exit for
the cooling tower U072249004.
Volumetric (m^3/s)
Flow
V1-2 1.7531
V2-3 5.9421
V3-4 8.472
V4-5 6.655
V5-6 3.88
Vout 26.70
15
Results & Discussion (Cont.)
- Mass flow rate of air exiting the cooling tower
𝑚3
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 26.70 𝑠 𝑘𝑔
𝑚ሶ 𝑎 = = = 30.57
𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑟 0.8738𝑚3 𝑠
𝑘𝑔
16
Results & Discussion (Cont.)
- Water Flow Rate:
𝑚ሶ 𝑎 ∗ ℎ4 − ℎ3 −(𝑚ሶ 5 − ℎ5 ) 30.57∗ 91.26−62.92 −(0.3216∗99.48) 𝑘𝑔
𝑚ሶ 𝑤 = = =34.59
(ℎ1 − ℎ2 ) 130.8−106.7 𝑠
𝑘𝐽
𝑄𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 𝑚ሶ 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 ∗ (ℎ1 − ℎ2 ) = 34.59 ∗ 130.8 − 106.7 = 834.3
𝑠
18
Results & Discussion (Cont.)
- Effectiveness of the CT is affected by the humidity in the inlet air
- Puerto Rico is a very humid ambient and it varies constantly (possible
cause of error)
- Velocity profile of air at the outlet
- Used to obtain mass flow rate of dry air
- Affects the required make-up water flow rate
- Mass flow rate of water to calculate heat load
- Represents the amount of energy removed from the system in kJ/s (KW)
- Power needed to move the fan
- Higher Voltage, lower current
- Which translate in less power losses
- Less power consumption (Money saving)
19
Conclusion
Mass Flow Rate of air Exiting the Cooling Tower: Heat Load:
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝐽
𝑚ሶ 𝑎 =30.57 𝑄𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 =834.3
𝑠 𝑠
Mass Flow Rate of air Entering the Cooling Tower:
𝑘𝑔
𝑚ሶ 5 =0.3216 Electrical Power Consumption:
𝑠 𝑘𝐽
Water Flow Rate: 𝑃𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟 =12.96
𝑠
𝑘𝑔
𝑚ሶ 𝑤 =34.59
𝑠
20
References
21
Thanks!
Any questions?
22
Use diagrams to explain your ideas
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor. Ipsum dolor sit
amet elit, sed do eiusmod tempor.
23