Security Threats-Non State Actors

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses non-traditional security threats in Pakistan from non-state actors and how their role has evolved over time. It also discusses the National Action Plan introduced by Pakistan to counter non-state actors and militant groups.

The National Action Plan aims to ensure no armed militias function in Pakistan, prevent banned organizations from re-emerging, ban glorification of terrorism, reform FATA, dismantle communication networks of terrorist groups and adopt a zero tolerance policy for militancy.

Globalization provided strength to non-state actors by allowing them to plan, train, finance and target across borders, making states confront more hindrances. It also allowed non-state actors to try and impose new social and cultural values to attract support.

Non-Traditional Security Threats in

Pakistan: Role of Non-State Actors


Chronology
• Pak-Afghan border
• FATA
• Cold war era
• Kashmir conflict
• Afghan war
• Post 9/11 development
• Nationalism vs. Religious fever
• Muj to Talib
• Classification of good & bad
Agency Area Population Population density

FATA 27220 3176331 117

Bajaur 1290 595227 461

Khyber 2576 546730 212

Kurram 3380 448310 133

Mohmand 2296 334453 146

North waziristan 4707 361246 77

Orakzai 1538 225441 147

South Waziristan 6620 429841 65


National Action Plan & NSAs
Agenda # Theme
3 Ensure no armed militias are allowed to function in the country

7 Ensuring against re-emergence of proscribed organisations


11 Ban on glorification of terrorism and terrorist organisations
through print and electronic media

12 FATA Reforms
13 Dismantling communication networks of terrorist organisations
15 Zero tolerance for militancy in Punjab
16 Taking the ongoing operation in Karachi to its logical conclusion

18 Dealing firmly with sectarian terrorists


19 Policy to deal with the issue of Afghan refugees
VNSAs
• NAP depicts the resolve of the state to weed
out violent Non-state Actors (VNSAs).
• In the backdrop of post cold war scenario
VNSAs posed more threat to the states than
the rival military might.
• The last three decades of 20th century
nurtured VNSAs consequently 21st century
witnessed their dominating role.
VNSAs
• There is hardly a country where existence of
NSAs can be denied, if somewhere they are
not active they may be dormant.
• Though VNSAs is a reality but often states opt
for “denial”. Such denial provides further
space and strength to the VNSAs.
VNSAs
• In post cold war scenario the pattern of
conflict changed significantly as armed
conflicts are not only being waged between
states but rather conflicts are taking place
within states.
• In post 9/11 scenario VNSAs persistently
challenged the legitimacy and power of the
states. By employing violent tactics they want
to attain public support and legitimacy.
Characteristics
• Organized groups
• Command structure
• Operate outside the state control
• Induct activists by force or attract volunteers
• In exceptional situations VNSAs also enjoy territorial
control. (TTP controlled certain pockets of FATA, LTTE in
Sri Lanka and Moro Islamic Liberation Front in
Philippines)
• Clandestine networks
• to advance their narrative employ latest techniques of
propaganda.
Characteristics
• Employ extreme violent tactics against civilian
population
• NSAs want to erode the public confidence in
state & multiply insecurity.
• VNSAs are active in the form of insurgents,
terrorists, militias & orginised criminal groups.

From ethnic to religious

• Prior to 9/11 VNSAs were primarily motivated


by ethnic considerations however in post 9/11
era “millenarianism” with intense religious
fever seems the prime motivation.
Nexus between NSAs & Criminal
Groups
• Though militias are not formally trained but
terrorist groups have special focus on intense
and goal oriented training.
• In certain situations terrorist organisations,
orginised criminal gangs & smugglers form
nexus hence some operational functions are
entrusted to criminal groups. In response
criminal groups get money and protection.
VNSAs
• By excessive & repeated coverage media unconsciously
provides oxygen to the VNSAs.
• Before implementation of NAP claiming of
responsibility through media by VNSAs was an
established norm. However by barring mass media to
accommodate such claims NAP bailed out the media.
• VNSAs are also very possessive about technology,
when they are denied physical space they prefer to
remain alive in cyber space.
• For furtherance of their mission VNSAs not only attract
volunteers but also employ child soldiers.
VNSAs desire change in state policies
• Acts of terrorism are primarily carried out to
compel the states to change the policies .Such
policy change is not always favorable to
VNSAs.
• In 2004 Madrid attacks forced Spain to
withdraw troops from Iraq however in the
backdrop of APS attack in Peshawar in 2014
Pakistani leadership developed consensus on
NAP thus opted for an offensive strategy.
Role of states in promotion of VNSAs
• To undermine rival states often states
financed, trained and extended diplomatic
support to VNSAs.
• Situation slips out of control when states fail
to realize that power to retain gun and
exercise powers to run the state are exclusive
powers of the states.
• States cannot afford militias, parallel
administrative or judicial apparatus.
VNSAs – usually enemy within
• In most of cases its enemy within who looks likes
locals hence difficult to identify.
• VNSAs always try to use ungoverned or weakly
governed space to their advantage.
• Also utilize cyber space to the optimum level.
• Technological advancement also provided
incentives to VNSAs hence threatened national
security.
• Also use the services of potential hackers.
VNSAs
• For emotional exploitation youth is often
employed .
• For financing donations are collected &
financial proceeds are transmitted through
flawed banking system & illegal transactions.
• To prove their worth they intrude into the
inner core of significant institutions. Ideology,
religion, ethnicity or sectarian affiliation may
be the driving force.
VNSAs
• Though in minority but for imposition of own agenda
VNSAs try to flex their muscles.
• Apparently NSAs pose threat to the governments but in
reality VNSAs are threat to the states.
• Through violent means VNSAs try to register their presence
and seek a permanent role in the statecraft.
• Since 1979 Pakistan is confronted with the increased
presence of VNSAs.
• During insurgency in Malakand & prior to operation Zarb-i-
Azb VNSAs challenged the writ of the state however after
military operations in Malakand and FATA it seems difficult
for VNSAs to register their open presence.
VNSAs
• Sympathizers within nation state system provide
more space to such elements.
• For criminal activities like kidnapping for ransom,
gunrunning and extortion VNSAs also use urban
space.
• International law primarily focuses on states
therefore there is no legal space to negotiate with
Non state actors.
• To ensure humanitarian coverage there is
growing demand for the inclusion of NSAs in
international law.
VNSAs
• VNSAs take full advantages of the flaws of the
criminal justice system and try to run their own
courts, jails and police.
• To satisfy the victims of crimes VNSAs often introduce
“revolutionary justice” thus often inflict harsh
punishments like capital punishments and beheading.
• For sometime VNSAs keep organizational unity intact
however owing to individuality and power centric
approach sometimes they face factionalism. In our
context TTP faced inner grouping that led to its
fragmentation.
Globalisation & VNSAs
• To impose new values VNSAs try to introduce new
social and cultural values. With such tact they attract
those who are already annoyed with the prevailing
norms. Beheading, suicide bombing, use of female for
violence and attacking shrines and places of worship
had never been part of our tribal culture but ongoing
onslaughts changed the dynamics. Consequently
VNSAs also resorted to cultural terrorism.
• Globalisation also provided strength to VNSAs, as
planning, training, financing, facilitation and targeting
are made in different parts of the world hence states
are persistently confronted with hindrances.
Natural disasters & VNSAs
• Apart from resorting to violence in the
backdrop of natural disasters for winning the
sympathies of common folk the activists of
such organisations enthusiastically participate
in relief activities.
PEACE ACCORDS
Nek
Killed in June 2004
APR 2004 Mohammad-
Abrogated
Govt (verbal)
Baitullah SWA $20 m compensation
FEB 2005
Mehsud-Govt /loan Alqaida
Baitullah NWA
SEP 2006
Mehsud-Govt August 2007 broke the deal
Lal Masjid
AUG 2007 10 Times Increase in SBs
Operation

Swat Peace
MAY 2008 Ultimatum to NWFP Govt.
Accord
Our faulty approach
• Flaw with our approach is that we want to
resolve every issue with force. Apart from
coercive approach there is dire need to opt for
inclusive approach too. De-radicalisation and re-
integration shall be the top priorities.
• Extremism is cancer infected followers of
different religions, cultures, ethnicity and sects
but yet it’s a curable cancer. A living state is to be
protective and humane therefore shall act as a
protective shield in between extremists and
innocent citizens.

You might also like