Non State Actors in Pakistan-Their Destabilizing Role in Political Crisis Faced by The Region
Non State Actors in Pakistan-Their Destabilizing Role in Political Crisis Faced by The Region
Non State Actors in Pakistan-Their Destabilizing Role in Political Crisis Faced by The Region
The Non State Actors in the present context of facilitators and force multipliers for VNSAs. In a
conflicts play a central role in bilateral relations with similar vein, globalization has allowed VNSAs to
neighboring countries. The VNASs make use of develop what might be termed transnational social
different violent and unfair and illegal means to capital and to create alliances and generate support
reach to their goals, they do not care for peace and outside the immediate area of their operations.
security issues; they have just become a threat for
international peace and security. In a cursory survey Non State Actors in Pakistan
it is being suggested that role of VNSAs is increasing
day by day and becoming a grave threat to peace and According to the USA (Rule of law in armed
stability. conflicts project 2012) 3 , a plethora of non-
NSAs begin to challenge nation-state borders and State armed groups have been engaged in
sovereignty claims. In his article Phil Williams violent struggle in Pakistan since 2001,
argues that “VNSAs have become a persistent including:
challenge to nation-states in the 21st century”1. • Harkat-ul-Jihad-I-Islamia (HUJI)
Sometimes Non State Actors that operate without a • Harkat-ul-Mujahideen (HUM)
state control plays a crucial role in internal and trans- • Hizb-I Islami Gulbuddin
border conflicts and subject the state institutions to (HIG)
their decisions. So it is important to take into • Hizbul Mujahideen (HM)
consideration the complex implications of the NSA • Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM)
and VNSAs on state and its domestic and foreign • Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ)
policies. • Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)
• Sipah-e-Sahaba/Pakistan
Rise of NON State Actors (SSP)
• * Al-Islambouli Brigades of
Non State Actors do have certain things in common: al-Qaeda
they all emerge in response to inadequacies, These NSAs have no common interest
deficiencies or shortcomings in many states and to therefore the numbers. They, however, seem to be
one degree or another seek to compensate for those caused by the both factors: on the one hand the
shortcomings. The incapable states fail to meet the inability of the country to manage its political affairs
needs of their peoples and the gap is filed by other while as on the other, they are sponsored some
actors and they illegally undermine the weak states Intelligence agencies or certain government
and try to capture the power and come with institutions in other countries in order to fulfill their
alternative governance. Philip Williams also short term goals.
highlighted certain key dimensions responsible for The ISI is believed to be aiding these
the rise of NSAs such as the absence of organizations in Pakistan in eradicating perceived
legitimacy-absence of loyalty and agreement, states enemies and those opposed to their cause, including
with capacity gaps, primacy of individual interest India. The FBI’s Satellite Imagery has suggested the
over collective interest. While talking about the existence of several militant camps in Pakistan with
legitimacy of the state he then quotes David at least one militant admitting that he is being trained
Ronfeldt, “as a society degenerates…the more its for fighting in India. Pakistan is being believed to be
state, market, and civil society systems falter and fall involved in supporting separatist militias and giving
apart—people are sure to revert to the tribal form. It shelter and training to different Jihadist organizations
again becomes the driving form.”(“Violent Non-State in order to fight in India and raise insurgencies on
Indian land. Many nonpartisan sources have
Actors and National and International Security”-
suggested that the officials within Pakistan’s ISI are
Philip Williams) providing aid to Jihadists and adding that the “ISI
We can add that VNSAs are the result of has provide covert but well documented support to
poor state governance but they further try to terrorist groups active in Kashmir”4. But the then
undermine the governance of the state. The role of Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari in clear cut had
Non State Actors in the international security got denied any kind of involvement in militant activities
attention after the 9/11 attack. The United States is in Kashmir and other parts of India and admitted that
also responsible for the rise of NSAs when the Soviet the previous Governments had “deliberately created
Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, the US trained and nurtured militants as a policy to achieve some
and armed the unarmed youths to resist the Soviet short-term tactical objectives”5
Invasion (R. Frost, Zaman 2015, Steve 2004).2
Globalization is also seen as one of the vital
factors for the rise of NSAs as it not only challenged
and under estimated the individual state capacity and
power to manage the state affairs but also provide