8.information System Controls: 8.3 The Disaster Recovery Plan
8.information System Controls: 8.3 The Disaster Recovery Plan
8.information System Controls: 8.3 The Disaster Recovery Plan
• Like every insurance plan, there are benefits that can
be obtained from the drafting of a disaster recovery
plan. Some of these benefits are:
1. Providing a sense of security
2. Minimizing risk of delays
3. Guaranteeing the reliability of standby systems
4. Providing a standard for testing the plan
5. Minimizing decision-making during a disaster
6. Reducing potential legal liabilities
7. Lowering unnecessarily stressful work environment
Types of plans
• There is no one right type of disaster recovery
plan, nor is there a one-size-fits-all disaster
recovery plan.
• However, there are three basic strategies that
feature in all disaster recovery plans:
1. Preventive Measures
2. Detective Measures
3. Corrective Measures.
1. Preventive Measures
• For a DRP to be successful, the central responsibility for
the plan must reside on top management.
• Management is responsible for coordinating the DRP
and ensuring its effectiveness within the organization.
• It is also responsible for allocating adequate time and
resources required in the development of an effective
plan.
• Resources that management must allocate include
both financial considerations and the effort of all
personnel involved.
2. Establishing a Planning Committee (PC)
• A PC is appointed to oversee the development
and implementation of the plan.
• The PC includes representatives from all
functional areas of the organization.
• Key PC members customarily include the
operations manager and the data processing
manager.
• The PC also defines the scope of the plan.
3. Performing a Risk Assessment
• The PC prepares a risk analysis and a business impact analysis (BIA)
that includes a range of possible disasters, including natural,
technical and human threats.
• Each functional area of the organization is analyzed to determine the
potential consequence and impact associated with several disaster
scenarios.
• The risk assessment process also evaluates the safety of critical
documents and vital records.
• Traditionally, fire has posed the greatest threat to an organization.
Intentional human destruction, however, should also be considered.
• A thorough plan provides for the “worst case” situation: destruction
of the main building. It is important to assess the impacts and
consequences resulting from loss of information and services.
• The PC also analyzes the costs related to minimizing the potential
exposures.
4. Establishing Priorities for
Processing and Operations
• At this point, the critical needs of each department within the organization are evaluated
in order to prioritize them.
• Establishing priorities is important because no organization possesses infinite resources
and criteria must be set as to where to allocate resources first.
• Some of the areas often reviewed during the prioritization process are functional
operations, key personnel and their functions, information flow, processing systems
used, services provided, existing documentation, historical records, and the
department's policies and procedures.
• Processing and operations are analyzed to determine the maximum amount of time
that the department and organization CAN OPERATE WITHOUT each critical system. This
will later get mapped into the Recovery Time Objective.
• A critical system is defined as that which is part of a system or procedure necessary to
continue operations should a department, computer centre, main facility or a
combination of these be destroyed or become inaccessible.
• A method used to determine the critical needs of a department is to document all the
functions performed by each department. Once the primary functions have been
identified, the operations and processes are then RANKED in order of priority: essential,
important and non-essential.
5. Determining Recovery Strategies
• During this phase, the most practical alternatives for processing in case of a disaster
are researched and evaluated.
• ALL ASPECTS of the organization are considered, including physical
facilities, computer hardware and software, communications links, data
files and databases, customer services provided, user operations, the
overall management information systems (MIS) structure, end-user systems, and
any other processing operations.
• Alternatives, dependent upon the evaluation of the computer function, may include:
the provision of more than one data centre, the installation and deployment of
multiple computer system, duplication of service centre, consortium arrangements,
lease of equipment, and any combinations of the above.
• Written agreements for the alternatives selected are prepared, specifying contract
duration, termination conditions, system testing, cost, any special security
procedures, procedure for the notification of system changes, hours of operation,
the specific hardware and other equipment required for processing, personnel
requirements, definition of the circumstances constituting an emergency, priorities,
and other contractual issues.
6. Collecting Data
• In this phase, data collection takes place. Among the
recommended data gathering materials and documentation
often included are various lists (critical telephone numbers list,
master call list, master vendor list, notification checklist),
inventories (communications equipment, documentation, office
equipment, forms, insurance policies, data centre computer
hardware, office supply, off-site storage location equipment,
telephones, etc.), software and data files backup/retention
schedules, temporary location specifications, any other such
other lists, materials, inventories and documentation.
• Pre-formatted forms are often used to facilitate the data
gathering process.
7.Organizing and Documenting a Written Plan
• Next, an outline of the plan’s contents is prepared to guide the
development of the detailed procedures. The Top management then
reviews and approves the proposed plan.
• It is during this phase that the actual written plan is then developed in its
entirety, including all detailed procedures to be used before, during, and
after a disaster.
• The procedures include methods for maintaining and updating the plan
to reflect any significant internal, external or systems changes.
• The procedures allow for a regular review of the plan by key personnel
within the organization.
• The disaster recovery plan is structured using a team approach. Specific
responsibilities are assigned to the appropriate team for each functional
area of the organization. Teams responsible for administrative functions,
logistics, user support, computer backup, restoration and other
important areas in the organization are identified.
8. Developing Testing
Criteria and Procedures
• Best practices dictate that DRPs be thoroughly tested and evaluated on
a regular basis (at least annually).
• Thorough DR plans include documentation with the procedures for
testing the plan.
• The tests will provide the organization with the assurance that all
necessary steps are included in the plan. Other reasons for testing
include:
Determining the feasibility and compatibility of backup facilities and
procedures.
Identifying areas in the plan that need modification.
Providing training to team managers and team members.
Demonstrating the ability of the organization to recover.
Providing motivation for maintaining and updating the disaster recovery plan.
9. Testing the Plan
• After testing procedures have been completed, an initial "dry run"
of the plan is performed by conducting a structured walk-through
test.
• The test will provide additional information regarding any further
steps that may need to be included, changes in procedures that
are not effective, and other appropriate adjustments. These may
not become evident unless an actual dry-run test is performed.
• The plan is subsequently updated to correct any problems
identified during the test.
• Initially, testing of the plan is done in sections and after normal
business hours to minimize disruptions to the overall operations of
the organization. As the plan is further polished, future tests occur
during normal business hours.
10. Obtaining Plan Approval
• Once the DRP has been written and tested,
the plan is then submitted to management for
approval.
• It is top management’s ultimate responsibility
that the organization has a documented and
tested plan.
Common Mistakes Organizations Make
in Coming up with DRPs
• Due to its high cost, disaster recovery plans are
not without critics. Cormac Foster has identified
five "common mistakes" organizations often
make related to disaster recovery planning:
1. Lack of buy-in
2. Incomplete RTOs and RPOs
3. Systems Oversight
4. Lax security
5. Outdated plans
1. Lack of buy-in
• One factor is the perception by executive
management that DR planning is "just another fake
earthquake drill" or CEOs that fail to make DR
planning and preparation a PRIORITY, are often
significant contributors to the failure of a DR plan.
2. Incomplete RTOs and RPOs
• A third point of failure involves focusing only on DR
without considering the larger business continuity needs:
"Data and systems restoration after a disaster are
essential, BUT every business process in your
organization will need IT support, and that support
requires planning and resources.“
• As an example, corporate office space lost to a disaster
can result in an instant pool of teleworkers which, in turn,
can overload a company's VPN overnight, overwork the
IT support staff at the blink of an eye and cause serious
bottlenecks and monopolies with the dial-in PBX system.
4. Lax security
• When there is a disaster, an organization's data and business processes
become vulnerable.
• As such, security can be more important than the raw speed involved in
a disaster recovery plan's RTO.
• The most critical consideration then becomes securing the new data
pipelines: from new VPNs to the connection from offsite backup
services.
• Another security concern includes documenting every step of the
recovery process—something that is especially important in highly
regulated industries, government agencies, or in disasters requiring
post-mortem forensics.
• Locking down or remotely wiping lost handheld devices is also an area
that may require addressing.
5. Outdated Plans
• Another important aspect that is often overlooked involves
the frequency with which DR Plans are updated.
• Yearly updates are recommended but some industries or
organizations require more frequent updates because
business processes evolve or because of quicker data growth.
• To stay relevant, disaster recovery plans should be an
integral part of all business analysis processes, and should
be revisited at every major corporate acquisition, at every
new product launch and at every new system development
milestone.