This document discusses allocating joint production costs across multiple products. It defines joint products as those produced simultaneously from one process. Several methods for allocating joint costs are presented, including relative sales value, physical units, constant gross margin, and net realizable value. While each method yields different product costs and profits, there is no universally correct approach since joint cost allocation is arbitrary. The allocated costs are unreliable for management decisions due to this arbitrary nature.
This document discusses allocating joint production costs across multiple products. It defines joint products as those produced simultaneously from one process. Several methods for allocating joint costs are presented, including relative sales value, physical units, constant gross margin, and net realizable value. While each method yields different product costs and profits, there is no universally correct approach since joint cost allocation is arbitrary. The allocated costs are unreliable for management decisions due to this arbitrary nature.
This document discusses allocating joint production costs across multiple products. It defines joint products as those produced simultaneously from one process. Several methods for allocating joint costs are presented, including relative sales value, physical units, constant gross margin, and net realizable value. While each method yields different product costs and profits, there is no universally correct approach since joint cost allocation is arbitrary. The allocated costs are unreliable for management decisions due to this arbitrary nature.
This document discusses allocating joint production costs across multiple products. It defines joint products as those produced simultaneously from one process. Several methods for allocating joint costs are presented, including relative sales value, physical units, constant gross margin, and net realizable value. While each method yields different product costs and profits, there is no universally correct approach since joint cost allocation is arbitrary. The allocated costs are unreliable for management decisions due to this arbitrary nature.
Recap Absorption and variable costing (Conventional costing methods) Major difference: treatment of Fixed manufacturing OH – Variable costing - Period cost – Absorption costing - Product cost
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 2
Learning Objectives At the end of this session you should be able to: – Define a joint product and give an example – Differentiate the different methods of allocating joint costs – Allocate joint costs using different methods to joint products for decision making
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 3
Introduction Decision to sell or process further a joint product is normally associated with manufacturing companies. Relevance of joint cost allocation: – Decision to sell at split-off or process further - irrelevant – Determine product costs & COGS - relevant 06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 4 What are joint products? Joint products are “two or more products that are produced simultaneously from the one production process” (p865).
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 5
What are joint costs? “Joint cost all manufacturing costs incurred in the production of joint products” (p866)
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 6
Examples of Joint Products Oil-refining industry – petroleum, LPG, kerosene, & other products Chicken-processing industry – Various cuts of chicken: drumsticks, wings & breasts, chicken feet, feathers, & carcass
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 7
Cost allocation Dilemma - Inability to identify individual products during production results in unprecise determination of costs. Solution : Use of arbitrary methods to value inventory and COGS. Precaution: Joint production costs must be interpreted very carefully.
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 8
Joint production process Decision - sold joint-product at a split- off point or processed further.
Split-off point - “the stage in the
production process where the joint products are identifiable as separate product” (p865).
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 9
Lecture Illustration Consider Exhibit 19.15 (p865) - International Chocolate Company. Details: – Total joint cost - $1,100 – Output: 750kg of Cocoa butter & 250kg of Cocoa powder – The total joint cost is an irrelevant cost for deciding whether to sell at split-off point or to process further.
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 10
Cost allocation Relative sales value method – “a method of allocating joint cost to joint products in proportion to their sales value at the split-off point” (p866). – The allocation of joint production does NOT make it a relevant cost because that cost remains fixed despite the decision to process it further.
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 11
Illustration - Relative sales value method
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 12
Other allocation methods Physical units method Constant gross margin method Net realisable value method
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 13
Physical units method Definition: – “a method of allocating joint costs to joint products based on some physical characteristic of the joint products at the split-off point” (p876). – In the illustrative example, weight of the product is used as the physical characteristic.
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 14
Illustration - Physical units method
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 15
Constant gross margin method Definition: – “a method of allocating joint costs to joint products so that the gross margin for each product is identical” (p876). – Steps: • 1 - Calculate gross margin for the entire production process • 2 - Calculate the required gross margin • 3 -Calculate the allocation of joint costs. 06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 16 Illustration- Constant gross margin method.
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 17
Net realisable value method Definition: – “a method of allocating joint costs to the joint products according to the relative size of the final products’ net realisable values” (p876). – Steps: • 1 - Calculate the net realisable value of the individual products. • 2 - Calculate the relative proportion based on the net realisable value • 3 - Allocate joint costs to products
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 18
Illustration - Net realisable value method
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 19
Profitability under each method Profits differ under each method. Which method is more ‘accurate’? – None, because the methods are arbitrary cost allocation methods.
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 20
Evaluation of the methods Each method has different product costs and different profits. The nature of the joint-product cost makes it difficult to make preference on the methods. All methods are arbitrary methods There’s no correct way of allocating joint product costs. 06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 21 Evaluation of methods Allocated joint costs are unreliable for pricing as well as any other management decisions because of their arbitrary nature. The nature of joint-product doesn’t allow the ‘discontinuation’ of producing a joint product
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 22
Lecture revision questions Refer to hand-out (past mid-semester papers)
06/02/19 AF201 Lecture, S1, 2018 23
Summary Joint products are products that are simultaneously produced in one production process. Joint product costs are irrelevant information for decision making - e.g. pricing decisions or sell @ split-off point or process further a joint product. Joint costs are normally used for estimating COGS and value of inventory.