Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Comparative Study On Wind Analysis of Structure As Per IS 875-III (1987) & IS 875-III (2015) Using ETABS

    Uploaded by

    LALIT NIKAM
    The document compares the wind analysis of an industrial steel structure according to IS 875-III (1987) and IS 875-III (2015) standards using ETABS software. It outlines the key differences between the two standards, such as additional factors for cyclonic regions and revised pressure coefficients tables in the updated standard. It then provides details of designing a truss and purlins according to both standards, calculating wind loads, pressures, and resulting forces. The analysis will then be modeled in ETABS to validate the manual calculations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comparative Study On Wind Analysis of Structure As Per IS 875-III (1987) & IS 875-III (2015) Using ETABS

    Uploaded by

    LALIT NIKAM
    41 views23 pages
    The document compares the wind analysis of an industrial steel structure according to IS 875-III (1987) and IS 875-III (2015) standards using ETABS software. It outlines the key differences between the two standards, such as additional factors for cyclonic regions and revised pressure coefficients tables in the updated standard. It then provides details of designing a truss and purlins according to both standards, calculating wind loads, pressures, and resulting forces. The analysis will then be modeled in ETABS to validate the manual calculations.

    Original Description:

    Wind analysis of truss

    Original Title

    Sssss

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares the wind analysis of an industrial steel structure according to IS 875-III (1987) and IS 875-III (2015) standards using ETABS software. It outlines the key differences between the two standards, such as additional factors for cyclonic regions and revised pressure coefficients tables in the updated standard. It then provides details of designing a truss and purlins according to both standards, calculating wind loads, pressures, and resulting forces. The analysis will then be modeled in ETABS to validate the manual calculations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    41 views23 pages

    Comparative Study On Wind Analysis of Structure As Per IS 875-III (1987) & IS 875-III (2015) Using ETABS

    Uploaded by

    LALIT NIKAM
    The document compares the wind analysis of an industrial steel structure according to IS 875-III (1987) and IS 875-III (2015) standards using ETABS software. It outlines the key differences between the two standards, such as additional factors for cyclonic regions and revised pressure coefficients tables in the updated standard. It then provides details of designing a truss and purlins according to both standards, calculating wind loads, pressures, and resulting forces. The analysis will then be modeled in ETABS to validate the manual calculations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 23

    Comparative Study On Wind Analysis

    Of Structure As Per IS 875-III (1987) &


    IS 875-III(2015) Using ETABS

    PRESENTED BY
    JAGTAP AMAR BHAGYAVANT
    561006
    218M0023
    CONTENT
    • Introduction
    • Problem statement
    • Objective
    • Scope
    • Difference in IS code
    • Truss design
    • Design of Purlin as per IS 875(III)-1987
    • Design of Purlin as per IS 875(III)-2015
    INTRODUCTION
    • In this project we are going to compare the
    results as per old IS code and updated IS code.
    • With the help of ETAB software we will
    analyze the industrial steel structure and will
    check the manual results & software results.
    PROBLEM STATEMENT
    • As per updated IS code we are designing and
    finding out results of industrial steel structure.
    OBJECTIVE
    • Wind analysis of truss (steel structure) with
    the help of ETAB software.
    • Comparison of results with the help of IS 875-
    III (1987) & IS 875-III (2015).
    SCOPE
    • To
    MAJOR CHANGES IN IS 875-III (1987) &
    IS 875-III(2015)
    IS 875-III (1987) IS 875-III (2015)

    • 1 clause added-Cl 2
    Guidelines for improving cyclonic resistance
    of low rise houses and other buildings/
    structures.

    • 5.3 Design wind speed (Vz)- • 6.3 desing wind speed (Vz)-
    Vz=Vb K1 K2 K3 Vz=VbK1K2K3K4

    Vb-basic wind speed Vb-basic wind speed


    K1-Risk coefficient(5.3.1) K1-Risk coefficient(6.3.1)
    K2-terrain category, height and structure size K2-terrain category, height and structure size
    factor (5.3.2) factor (6.3.2)
    K3-topography factor (5.3.3) K3-topography factor (6.3.3)
    K4-Importance factor for cyclonic
    region.(6.3.4)
    IS 875-III (1987) IS 875-III (2015)

    • For K1 table 1 cl 5.3.1 pg no.7 • No change in table no.1 reamins as it is.

    • For K2 table 2 cl 5.3.2.2 pg no.12 • Class of structure removed from table 2


    Class of Structure included -
    Class A class B Class C

    • For K3 cl 5.3.3.1 • K3 remains as it is.

    • K4-6.3.4
    Now a days cyclones plays vital role due to
    global warming so in coastal areas due to
    cyclonic wind pressure structure gets
    damaged so
    IS 875-III (1987) IS 875-III (2015)

    • 5.4 Design Wind Pressure (Pz)- • 7.2 design wind pressure-


    Pz=0.6(VzxVz) Pz=0.6(VzxVz)

    Pd-KdKaKcPz

    Kd-wind directionality factor (7.2.1)


    Considering randomness in the
    directionality of wind.

    Ka-area averaging factor (7.2.2) table4


    Averaging the measured pressure values
    over area as pressure is inversely
    proportional to the area.

    Kc- combination factor (7.3.3.13)


    Pressure or suction inside and outside of the
    structure shall not be correlate so.
    • External and Internal pressure coefficient • Cpe and Cpi remains as it is.
    (cl.6.2.2. and 6.2.3)

    • 5.2.1Final wind load acting on the • F=(Cpe-Cpi)APd no change.


    structure (F)=(Cpe-Cpi)APd

    A- surface area of structural element


    Pd-design wind pressure
    Truss design
    • Assume:- City - Pune
    • Span=12m
    • Rise of Truss – Pitch*Span
    0.25*12=3m
    • θ be angle of inclination of the roof with the
    horizontal:
    tanθ = rise/L/2=3/6
    θ = 26.56
    • Spacing of Truss = 1/4 span
    12/4 = 3m
    • Sloping length = √3^2+6^2 = 6.7 m
    • Spacing of purlin = 6.7/4 = 1.67
    • Length of panel on plan area = 1.67*cos26.56
    = 1.5 m
    Therefore, no. of panels = 12/1.5 = 8 m
    Design of Purlin
    • Dead load calculation (875 - I)
    Self wt. of roofing sheet (GI) = 130 N/m^2
    Assume self wt. of purlin = 100 N/m^2
    Total dead load on purlin = 230*1.67 = 384.1 N/m^2
    • Live load calculation (875 - II)
    Live load on purlin = 750-20(Θ-10)
    = 750-20(26.56-10)
    = 418.8 N/m^2
    Total live load on purlin = 418.8*1.7 = 700 N/m^2
    Design of Purlin
    • Calculation of Wind load, as per 875-III (1987)
    • Basic wind speed = 39m/s (annexure A )
    • Design Wind speed= Vz = K1.K2.K3
    K1=1,K2=1,K3=1
    therefore Design wind speed = 39m/s
    • Design Wind pressure = Pd = 0.6*Vz^2
    = 0.6*39*39
    = 912.6N/m^2
    • Wind pressure on Roof
    • External Wind pressure = Cpe
    (table no 5 pg. no. 16 cl.6.2.2.2)
    • H/w=6/12=0.5<=1/2 & for roof angle α=26.65

    Roof angle Θ=0 θ=0 Θ=90 Θ=90


    EF GH EG FH
    20 -0.4 -0.4 -0.7 -0.6
    26.56 -0.1376 -0.4 -0.7 -0.6
    30 0 -0.4 -0.7 -0.6
    • Internal pressure coefficient = Cpi = ±0.2
    (cl.6.2.3 pg no 27) (normal permeability)

    • Wind pressure difference (Cpe-Cpi)=


    when θ=0
    case 1= External + Internal
    windward side= -0.1376+0.2 = 0.0624
    leeward side = -0.4+0.2 = -0.2
    case2=external-internal
    windward side= -0.1376-0.2 = -0.3376
    leeward side = -0.4-0.2 = -0.6
    • When θ=90

    Case1= External + Internal


    windward=-0.7+0.2= -0.5
    leeward =-0.6+0.2= -0.4

    Case2= External - Internal


    windward=-0.7-0.2= -0.9
    leeward =-0.6-0.2= -0.8

    Among 4 cases Cpe – Cpi = -0.9 gives the most worst


    effect therefore ,

    F= (Cpe - Cpi)*wind pressure*spacing of purlin


    = -0.9*912.6*1.7
    = -1371.64 N/m
    Design of Purlin
    • Calculation of Wind load, as per 875-III (2015)
    • Basic wind speed = 39m/s
    • Design Wind speed= Vz = K1.K2.K3.K4
    K1=1,K2=1,K3=1,K4=1.15
    therefore Design wind speed = 44.85m/s
    • Design Wind pressure = Pz = 0.6*Vz^2
    = 0.6*44.85*44.85
    = 1206.91 N/m^2
    • The design wind pressure obtained as-
    Pd = Kd.Ka.Kc.Pz
    Kd = 0.90 wind directionality factor (cl.7.2.1,pg.9)
    Ka = 1.00 area averaging factor (cl.7.2.2,pg.10)
    (-0.9*1.7*3 = 4.59 < 10m^2)
    Kc = 0.90 combination factor (cl.7.3.3.13,pg.16)
    Therefore,
    Pd = (1206.91)*(0.90)*(1)*(0.90)
    = 977.59 N/m^2
    • Wind pressure on Roof
    • External Wind pressure = Cpe
    (table no 6 pg. no. 14 cl.7.3.2.2)
    • H/w=6/12=0.5<=1/2 & for roof angle α=26.65
    • Internal pressure coefficient = Cpi = ±0.2
    (cl.7.3.2 pg.27) (normal permeability)

    • Wind pressure difference (Cpe - Cpi)=


    when θ=0
    Case 1= External + Internal
    windward side = -0.1376+0.2 = 0.0624
    leeward side = -0.4+0.2 = -0.2
    Case2=External - Internal
    windward side = -0.1376-0.2 = -0.3376
    leeward side =-0.4-0.2 = -0.6
    • When θ=90

    Case1 = External + Internal


    windward = -0.7+0.2 = -0.5
    leeward = -0.6+0.2 = -0.4

    Case2 = External - Internal


    windward = -0.7-0.2 = -0.9
    leeward = -0.6-0.2 = -0.8

    Among 4 cases Cpe – Cpi = -0.9 gives the most worst


    effect therefore,

    F= (Cpe - Cpi)*wind pressure*spacing of purlin


    = -0.9*977.59*1.7
    = -1495.72 N/m
    What Next ?
    1)We will find out total load acting on truss.
    2)For that load and moment, we will check
    suitable sections (I section/Channel section/angle
    section etc.)
    3)All this manual calculation/data will utilize to
    form a model/structure in ETAB.
    4)Will analyze the structure as per both IS codes
    with the help of ETAB.

    You might also like