Investment 3
Investment 3
Investment 3
Pricing Model
(CAPM)
Chapter 10
Individual Securities
1
2.05% (3.24% 0.01% 2.89%) 14.3% 0.0205
3
The Return and Risk for
Portfolios
Stock fund Bond Fund
Rate of Squared Rate of Squared
Scenario Return Deviation Return Deviation
Recession -7% 3.24% 17% 1.00%
Normal 12% 0.01% 7% 0.00%
Boom 28% 2.89% -3% 1.00%
Expected return 11.00% 7.00%
Variance 0.0205 0.0067
Standard Deviation 14.3% 8.2%
Portfolio Return
10% 5.9% 7.4% 11.0%
15% 4.8% 7.6% 10.0% 100%
20% 3.7% 7.8% 9.0% stocks
25% 2.6% 8.0% 8.0%
30% 1.4% 8.2% 7.0%
35% 0.4% 8.4% 100%
6.0%
40% 0.9% 8.6% bonds
5.0%
45% 2.0% 8.8%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
50.00% 3.08% 9.00%
55% 4.2% 9.2% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation)
60% 5.3% 9.4%
65%
70%
6.4%
7.6%
9.6%
9.8%
We can consider other
75% 8.7% 10.0% portfolio weights besides
80% 9.8% 10.2%
85% 10.9% 10.4% 50% in stocks and 50% in
90% 12.1% 10.6% bonds
95% 13.2% 10.8%
100% 14.3% 11.0%
10.4 The Efficient Set for
Two Assets
% in stocksPortfolo Risk and Return Combinations
Risk Return
0% 8.2% 7.0%
5% 7.0% 7.2% 12.0%
Portfolio Return
10% 5.9% 7.4% 11.0%
15% 4.8% 7.6% 10.0% 100%
20% 3.7% 7.8% 9.0% stocks
25% 2.6% 8.0% 8.0%
30% 1.4% 8.2% 7.0% 100%
35% 0.4% 8.4% 6.0% bonds
40% 0.9% 8.6% 5.0%
45% 2.0% 8.8% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
50% 3.1% 9.0%
55% 4.2% 9.2% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation)
60% 5.3% 9.4%
65% 6.4% 9.6% Note that some portfolios are
70%
75%
7.6%
8.7%
9.8%
10.0%
better than others. They have
80% 9.8% 10.2% higher returns for the same level
85% 10.9% 10.4%
90% 12.1% 10.6%
of risk or less.
95% 13.2% 10.8%
100% 14.3% 11.0%
Two-Security Portfolios with Various
Correlations
return
100%
= -1.0 stocks
= 1.0
100%
= 0.2
bonds
Portfolio Risk/Return Two
Securities: Correlation Effects
Relationship depends on correlation
coefficient
-1.0 < < +1.0
The smaller the correlation, the greater the
risk reduction potential
If= +1.0, no risk reduction is possible
The Efficient Set for Many
Securities
return
Individual Assets
P
Consider a world with many risky assets; we can still identify the
opportunity set of risk-return combinations of various portfolios.
The Efficient Set for Many
Securities
return minimum
variance
portfolio
Individual Assets
return
o nt i er
r
nt f
cie
effi
minimum
variance
portfolio
Individual Assets
P
The section of the opportunity set above the minimum
variance portfolio is the efficient frontier.
Optimal Risky Portfolio with a Risk-
Free Asset
return
100%
stocks
rf
100%
bonds
In addition to stocks and bonds, consider a world that
also has risk-free securities like T-bills
Riskless Borrowing and
Lending
L
return
CM 100%
stocks
Balanced
fund
rf
100%
bonds
Now investors can allocate their money across
the T-bills and a balanced mutual fund
The Capital Market Line
Assumptions:
Rational Investors:
More return is preferred to less.
Less risk is preferred to more.
Homogeneous expectations
Riskless borrowing and lending.
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
With a risk-free asset available and the efficient frontier
identified, we choose the capital allocation line with the steepest
slope
Market Equilibrium
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
With the capital allocation line identified, all investors choose a point
along the linesome combination of the risk-free asset and the
market portfolio M. In a world with homogeneous expectations, M is
the same for all investors.
The Separation Property
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
The Separation Property states that the market portfolio, M, is
the same for all investorsthey can separate their risk
aversion from their choice of the market portfolio.
The Separation Property
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
Investor risk aversion is revealed in their choice of where to stay
along the capital allocation linenot in their choice of the line.
Market Equilibrium
return
CM 100%
stocks
Balanced
fund
rf
100%
bonds
Just where the investor chooses along the Capital Market Line
depends on his risk tolerance. The big point though is that all
investors have the same CML.
Market Equilibrium
return
CM 100%
stocks
Optimal
Risky
Porfolio
rf
100%
bonds
All investors have the same CML because they all have
the same optimal risky portfolio given the risk-free rate.
The Separation Property
return
CM 100%
stocks
Optimal
Risky
Porfolio
rf
100%
bonds
The separation property implies that portfolio choice can
be separated into two tasks: (1) determine the optimal
risky portfolio, and (2) selecting a point on the CML.
Optimal Risky Portfolio with a
Risk-Free Asset
L 0 CML 1
return
CM 100%
stocks
The optimal risky portfolio depends on the
risk-free rate as well as the risky assets.
Expected versus Unexpected
Returns
Realized returns are generally not equal to
expected returns
There is the expected component and the
unexpected component
At any point in time, the unexpected return can be
either positive or negative
Over time, the average of the unexpected
component is zero
Returns
Diversifiable Risk;
Nonsystematic Risk;
Firm Specific Risk;
Unique Risk
Portfolio risk
Nondiversifiable risk;
Systematic Risk;
Market Risk
n
Thus diversification can eliminate some, but not all of the
risk of individual securities.
Definition of Risk When Investors
Hold the Market Portfolio
The best measure of the risk of a security in a
large portfolio is the beta ()of the security.
Beta measures the responsiveness of a
security to movements in the market portfolio.
Cov ( Ri , RM )
i
( RM )
2
Total versus Systematic Risk
Security Returns
i ne
c L
i
r ist
c te
ara
Ch Slope = i
Return on
market %
Ri = i + iRm + ei
Beta
Reuters
Yahoo
The Formula for Beta
Cov( Ri , RM )
i
( RM )
2
E ( Ri ) RF
Re ward / Risk
i
Market Equilibrium
E ( RA ) R f E ( RM ) R f
A M
Relationship between Risk and
Expected Return (CAPM)
Expected Return on the Market:
R M RF Market Risk Premium
Expected return on an individual security:
R i RF i ( R M RF )
R i RF i ( R M RF )
Expected
Risk- Beta of the Market risk
return on = +
free rate security premium
a security
RM
RF
1.0
The slope of the security market line is equal to the market risk
premium; i.e., the reward for bearing an average amount of
systematic risk.
Relationship Between Risk &
Expected Return
Expected
return
13.5%
i 1.5 3%
RF 3%
1.5
R M 10%
R i 3% 1.5 (10% 3%) 13.5%
Total versus Systematic Risk
return
L
Then with CM efficient frontier
borrowing or
lending, the M
investor selects a
point along the rf
CML.
P
Summary and Conclusions
The contribution of a security to the risk of a well-
diversified portfolio is proportional to the covariance of
the security's return with the markets return. This
contribution is called the beta.
Cov ( Ri , RM )
i
2 ( RM )
The CAPM states that the expected return on a security is
positively related to the securitys beta:
R i RF i ( R M RF )
Expected (Ex-ante) Return,
Variance and Covariance
Expected Return: E(R) = (ps x Rs)
Standard Deviation =
Correlation Coefficient: AB = AB / (A B)
Risk and Return Example
IBM2 = 0.05*(-22-18)2+0.20*(-2-18)2
+0.50*(20-18)2+0.20*(35-18)2
+0.05*(5018)2 = 271
IBM =16.5%
Covariance and Correlation
Correlation = 194/(16.5)(18.5)=.6355
Risk and Return for Portfolios (2
assets)
Expected Return of a Portfolio:
Variance of a Portfolio: