FSAE Suspension

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 23

FSAE Suspension

ME 191 Final Presentation


Spring 2009

Team Members:
Jarret Vian
Bryan Rowley
John Murray
Outline
Introduction
Re-Design
Manufacturing
Testing
Conclusion
Introduction
Design

Requirements
Minimum 60 wheel base
Unequal front & rear track widths
Minimum 1 ground clearance
Minimum 2 total suspension travel
Template must pass through frame
Spherical bearings must be in double shear
Design must handle applied loading

Design Goal
Rate of camber angle change with respect to
both body roll and wheel displacement
Re-Design
Original Final Design
Manufacturing
Manufactured at CSUS, by FSAE team
Manufacturing
A - Arms
Bearing Holder

Hub & Spindle

Upright
Geometry Testing

Camber Wheelbase
Caster Track Width
Goals
Rate of camber angle change per degree
body roll

Camber Angle vs. Body Roll (Theoretical) Camber Angle vs. Body Roll (Experimental)
3.50 1.00
3.00
f(x) = 0.75x - 0.56 0.50
2.50 f(x) = 0.79x - 1.51
R = 1
2.00 0.00 R = 1
1.50
-0.50 Camber
1.00 Camber
Camber Angle (Degrees) Linear (Camber)
Camber Angle (Degrees) Linear (Camber)
0.50 -1.00
0.00
-1.50
-0.50
-1.00 -2.00
5.00
0.00

Body Roll (Degrees)


Body Roll (Degrees)
Rate of camber angle change per inch of
wheel displacement

Camber Angle vs. Wheel Displacement (Theoretical) Camber Angle vs. Wheel Displacement (Experimental)
1.00 0.00

0.50 -0.50
f(x) = - 0.76x - 0.55
R = 1 f(x) = - 0.81x - 1.23
0.00 -1.00
R = 0.96
-0.50 Camber -1.50 Camber
Camber Angle (Degrees) Linear (Camber) Camber Angle (Degrees) Linear (Camber)
-1.00 -2.00

-1.50 -2.50

-2.00 -3.00
2.00 5.00
-2.00 -5.00

Wheel Displacement (Inches) Wheel Displacement (Inches)


Upright Testing

Strain Gages
Strain Gage
Installation

Degrease Solder Connect to


Abrade instrumentation
Burnish
Condition
Neutralize
M-Bond 200
Loading Scenario:
759lbs

Apply the load, and maintain a constant force on the tire


139lbs, 300lbs, 400lbs
Read the strain from each channel on the instrumentation
Strain Stress
Stress Extrapolation
Rosette 1
3,000

2,500
f(x) = 5.98x
2,000 R = 1

1,500
Von Mises Stress (psi)
1,000

500

0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Load (lbs)

Elastic
FEA Stress Value

Rosette location Probe


Theoretical
Experimental

Sy = 50,800psi

Assumption: rigid Assumption: smooth


Future Testing Plans
Straingauge and accelerometer data logged
during driving

Mychron 3 data logger Strain gauges


with internal Accelerometer
Conclusions
Budget
PREDICTED COST ACTUAL COST

MATERIALS 1545 610

BEARINGS 246 130

HARDWARE 232 135

TOTAL 2023 875


Lessons Learned

Engineering is challenging and rewarding

Never underestimate the scope of a project

Always test to verify assumptions


Questions

You might also like