Thesis Presentation
Thesis Presentation
Thesis Presentation
INTRODUCTION
Two
Objectives
Storage Study
Packed
samples and
sealed
Stored
Analyzed samples
Treatment Designation
Treatment
Product Ratio
T1
T2
Mean Average
Packaging Type
0
15
30
45
60
7.74
7.63
Laminated
aluminum foil
7.8
7.84 7.36
7.67a
bags
Polypropylene
bags
7.57a
7.85
7.98 6.98
7.47
7.84
Mean Average
Packaging Type
0
15
30
45
60
5.25
5.37
6.95
7.72
7.96
Laminated
aluminum foil
6.65a
bags
Polypropylene
bags
6.45a
5.31
5.29
6.31
7.68
7.67
Mean Average
Packaging Type
0
15
30
45
60
Laminated
aluminum foil
0.269a
0.266
0.273
0.266
0.269
0.269
bags
Polypropylene
bags
0.268a
0.271
0.276
0.256
0.262
0.275
Mean
Average
Packaging Type
15
30
45
60
Laminated
aluminum foil
0.266a
0.223
0.26
0.278
0.276
0.284
bags
Polypropylene
bags
0.259a
0.242
0.234
0.262
0.275
0.28
Mean Average
Packaging Type
0
15
30
45
60
Laminated
aluminum foil
6.33a
6.28
6.3
7.66
5.7
5.73
bags
Polypropylene
bags
6.43a
6.89
6.27
7.58
5.68
5.75
Mean
Average
Packaging Type
15
30
45
60
Laminated
aluminum foil
6.79a
5.69
5.68
7.11
7.12
8.36
bags
Polypropylene
bags
6.8a
5.69
5.75
7.15
7.05
8.36
0.40%
0.35%
0.30%
0.25%
0.20%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.15%
0.10%
0.05%
0.00%
0 days
15 days
30 days
Ginataang mais
45 days
Ginisang mais
60 days
0.40%
0.35%
0.30%
0.25%
0.20%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.40%
0.15%
0.10%
0.05%
0.00%
0 days
15 days
30 days
Ginataang mais
45 days
60 days
Ginisang mais
Figure 2. Effect of packaging material in the %FFA of instant ginataang mais and ginisang mais
in Polypropylene Bag
Table7. Mean scores of viscosity (cP) of instant ginataang mais during the 60 days storage
Product
Packaging
Storage days
Mean
Average
15
30
45
60
60.01
39.35
52.11
38.90
62.85
50.64a
Polypropylene 47.39
bags
64.98
49.36
60.00
36.89
52.08a
Ginataang
laminated
Mais
aluminum foil
bags
Ginisang
Mais
Packaging
Storage days
Mean Average
15
30
45
60
laminated
aluminum
foil bags
12.55
62.65
21.76
25.55
59.60
36.42a
Polypropyle
ne bags
17.90
33.98
37.96
46.78
41.92
35.71a
Table9. Microbial count of instant ginataang mais and ginisang mais packed in laminated aluminum
foil bags and Polypropylene bags
Product
Packaging
Storage Days
Initial
Instant
ginataang
mais
10
15
25
Polypropylen
e bags
<250 EAPC
laminated
aluminum
foil bags
<250 EAPC
Polypropylen
Instant
e bags
ginisang mais
laminated
aluminum
foil bags
<250 EAPC
<250 EAPC
30
45
60
Storage Days
15
30
Mean Average
45
60
laminated
5.40a
aluminum foil
bags
5.42
5.34
5.36
5.40
5.48
Polypropylene
bags
5.16
5.10
5.14
5.08
5.14
Means having similar letters were not significantly different at 5% level of difference
5.12a
Storage Days
Mean Average
15
30
45
60
7.04
6.98
6.90
6.92
7.06
6.78
6.82
6.78
6.78
7.04
laminated
aluminum foil
bags
6.98a
Polypropylene
bags
Means having similar letters were not significantly different at 5% level of difference
6.84b
Table16. Purchase intention for instant ginisang mais packed in laminated aluminum foil bags and Polypropylene bags
Packaging
Storage
Mean
type
average
45
60
15
Days
30
Laminated
aluminum foil
bags
2.60
2.60
2.62
2.58
2.64
2.61a
Polypropylen
e bags
2.46
2.46
2.44
2.46
2.46
2.46a
Table17. Purchase intention for instant ginataang mais packed in laminated aluminum foil bags and Polypropylene bag
Packaging
type
0
15
Storage
Days
30
Mean
average
Laminated
aluminum foil
bags
3.90
3.88
3.94
3.96
3.94
3.92a
Polypropylene
bags
3.70
3.74
3.74
3.76
3.74
3.74b
45
60
Conclusion
1. The two packaging materials have no significant
effects on the physic-chemical properties, microbial
count and cooking qualities of the product.
2. Products packed in laminated aluminum foil bag
have higher overall acceptability; all sensory
attributes of ginataang mais have just-about right
rating and all sensory attributes of ginisang mais
except undesirable taste and aroma have just-aboutright rating.
RECOMMENDATION
The researchers recommended to change the processing method of
ginisang mais to prevent the strong undesirable taste and undesirable aroma
perceived by the panelists.