ETIKA RISET Ethics in Clinical Research

Ethics in Clinical Research
DISARIKAN OLEH
I Nyoman Mangku Karmaya
Ethical Guidelines
The goal of clinical research is to develop
generalizable knowledge that improves human
health or increases understanding of human biology.
The path to finding out if a new drug or treatment is
safe or effective, for example, is to test it on patient
volunteers
Clinical research has the potential to exploit patient
volunteers.
The purpose of ethical guidelines is both to protect
patient volunteers and to preserve the integrity of
the science.
Codes of ethics and regulations that guide ethical clinical

research include:
Nuremberg Code (1947)

Declaration of Helsinki (2000)
Belmont Report (1979)
CIOMS (2002)
U.S. Common Rule (1991)
Seven main principles :
Social and clinical value

Scientific validity
Fair subject selection
Favorable risk-benefit ratio
Independent review
Informed consent
Respect for potential and enrolled su
bjects
Social and clinical value

Every research study is designed to answer
a specific question.
Answering certain questions will have
significant value for society or for present
or future patients with a particular illness
The answers to the research question
should contribute to scientific
understanding of health or improve our
ways of preventing, treating, or caring for
people with a given disease.
Scientific validity
A study should be designed in a way that will get an
understandable answer to the valuable research
question.
This includes
the question is answerable,
the research methods are valid and feasible,
the study is designed with a clear scientific objective and
using accepted principles, methods, and reliable practices.
The statistical plans be of sufficient power to definitively
test the objective, and for data analysis.
Invalid research is unethical because it is a waste of

resources and exposes people to risk for no purpose
Fair subject selection

People should be chosen in a way that minimizes
risks and enhances benefits to individuals and
society.
Groups and individuals who accept the risks and
burdens of research should be in a position to enjoy
its benefits,
Those who may benefit should share some of the
risks and burdens.
Specific groups or individuals (for example, women
or children) should not be excluded from the
opportunity to participate in research without a good
scientific reason or a particular susceptibility to risk.
Favorable risk-benefit ratio

Uncertainty about the degree of risks and benefits associated with a drug,
device, or procedure being tested is inherent in clinical research otherwise
there would be little point to doing the research.
there is more uncertainty about risks and benefits in early-phase research than in
later research.
research risks might be
trivial or serious,
might cause transient discomfort or long-term changes.
can be physical (death, disability, infection), psychological (depression, anxiety), economic (job loss),
or social (for example, discrimination or stigma from participating in a certain trial).
everything must be done

to minimize the risks and inconvenience to research subjects,
to maximize the potential benefits,
to determine that the potential benefits to individuals and society are proportionate to, or
outweigh,
Research volunteers often receive some health services and benefits in the
course of participating, yet the purpose of clinical research is not to provide
health services.

Independent review
What for?
To minimize potential conflicts of interest
To make sure a study is ethically acceptable before it even
starts,
an independent review panel with no vested interest in

the particular study should review the proposal and ask
important questions
Are those conducting the trial sufficiently free of bias?
Is the study doing all it can to protect research
volunteers?
Has the trial been ethically designed and is the risk
benefit ratio favorable?
Is done by Ethical Comite
Informed consent
individuals should make their own decision about whether
they want to participate or continue participating in research.
The individual
(1) are accurately informed of the purpose, methods, risks,
benefits, and alternatives to the research,
(2) understand this information and how it relates to their own
clinical situation or interests, and
(3) make a voluntary decision about whether to participate.
There are exceptions
in the case of a child,

of an adult with severe Alzheimers,
of an adult unconscious by head trauma,
of someone with limited mental capacity.
Respect for potential and enrolled subjects

Individuals should be treated with respect from the time they are
approached for possible participationeven if they refuse enrollment in
a studythroughout their participation and after their participation
ends.
This includes:
Respecting their privacy and keeping their private information confidential.
Respecting their right to change their mind, to decide that the research does
not match their interests, and to withdraw without penalty.
Informing them of new information that might emerge in the course of research,
which might change their assessment of the risks and benefits of participating.
Monitoring their welfare and, if they experience adverse reactions, untoward
events, or changes in clinical status, ensuring appropriate treatment and, when
necessary, removal from the study.
Informing them about what was learned from the research. Most researchers do
a good job of monitoring the volunteers welfare and making sure they are okay.
They are not always so good about distributing the study results. If they dont
tell you, ask
Terimakasih

ETIKA RISET Ethics in Clinical Research

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ETIKA RISET Ethics in Clinical Research

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ETIKA RISET Ethics in Clinical Research

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ethics in Clinical Research

Codes of ethics and regulations that guide ethical clinical

Nuremberg Code (1947)

Seven main principles :

Social and clinical value

Social and clinical value

Invalid research is unethical because it is a waste of

Fair subject selection

Favorable risk-benefit ratio

everything must be done

an independent review panel with no vested interest in

in the case of a child,

Respect for potential and enrolled subjects

You might also like