International Parity
International Parity
International Parity
A summary
Objective
Outline
On arbitrage and speculation
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
The International Fisher Effect (IFE)
Interest Rate Parity (IRP)
Arbitrage
ENCYCLOPDIA BRITANNICA
Uncovered (Speculation)
Covered (True arbitrage)
Borrow in $ at 5%
Buy pounds and lend at 8%
At maturity exchange back pounds for $
Hope that youll have enough to repay the loan and
make an arbitrage profit
Borrow in $ at 5%
Buy pounds and lend at 8%
At maturity exchange back pounds for $
Absolute PPP
Goods and services should cost the same regardless of
the country
Relative PPP
The exchange rate is expected to adjust in order to
reflect expected relative differences in purchasing
power.
PPP: Background
Exemplification
A particular DVD player sells for:
C$ 700 in Sherbrooke
US$ 500 in Burlington
Exchange rate: US$ 1.50/C$.
Consequences
Consumers in Burlington would prefer buying it in Sherbrooke.
Result:
The DVD player price in Sherbrooke should increase to C$750
Caveats
(1) Transportation costs, barriers to trade, and other can make a
difference.
(2) There must be competitive markets for the goods and services
in question in both countries.
PPP: Implications
E(st)/s0 = (1+inflationh)t/(1+inflationf)t
when t=1
E(s1)/s0 = (1+inflationh)/(1+inflationf)
For more than a decade, The Economists Big Mac index has offered a light-hearted guide to
whether currencies are at their correct level.
It is based on the theory of purchasing-power parity (PPP)the notion that a basket of goods
and services should cost the same in all countries.
Thus if the price of a Big Mac is lower in one country than in America, this suggests that its
currency is undervalued relative to the dollar and vice versa.
The price of a Big Mac varies in the euro area, from euro3.36 in Finland to a bargain euro2.19 in
Portugal. The weighted average price in the 11 countries is euro2.53, or $2.98 at current
exchange rates.
In America a Big Mac costs only $2.63 (taking the average of three cities).
So the Euro is 13% overvalued against the dollar.
Big MacCurrencies
Apr 27th 2000
Some people read tea leaves to predict the future. We prefer hamburgers
Some readers beef that our Big Mac index does not cut the mustard. They are right
that hamburgers are a flawed measure of PPP, because local prices may be distorted
by trade barriers on beef, sales taxes or big differences in the cost of non-traded
inputs such as rents. Thus, whereas Big Mac PPPs can be a handy guide to the cost
of living in countries, they may not be a reliable guide to future exchange-rate
movements. Yet, curiously, several academic studies have concluded that the Big
Mac index is surprisingly accurate in tracking exchange rates over the longer term.
Indeed, the Big Mac has had several forecasting successes. When the euro was
launched at the start of 1999, most forecasters predicted that it would rise. But the
euro has instead tumbledexactly as the Big Mac index had signaled. At the start of
1999, euro burgers were much dearer than American ones. Burgernomics is far from
perfect, but our mouths are where our money is.
ft/s0 = (1+nih)t/(1+nif)t
f1/s0 = (1+nih)/(1+nif), when t=1
Summary
The Law of One Price - the arbitrage argument - says
that goods and services should be worth the same when
compared across borders
An increase in inflation and the resulting increase in the
nominal interest rate should cause the domestic currency
to depreciate.
And vice-versa.