Plato and Aristotle were two influential Greek philosophers whose writings shaped political thought for centuries. Plato advocated for a utopian ideal republic ruled by philosopher-kings and defined by justice, while Aristotle analyzed different types of governments and believed the ideal form was a constitutional republic. Their concepts of virtue, citizenship, and using political power for the common good still resonate in modern Greece, though the current democracy differs from their visions in some ways. Their timeless principles remain an inspiration for societies seeking justice, equality, and good governance.
Plato and Aristotle were two influential Greek philosophers whose writings shaped political thought for centuries. Plato advocated for a utopian ideal republic ruled by philosopher-kings and defined by justice, while Aristotle analyzed different types of governments and believed the ideal form was a constitutional republic. Their concepts of virtue, citizenship, and using political power for the common good still resonate in modern Greece, though the current democracy differs from their visions in some ways. Their timeless principles remain an inspiration for societies seeking justice, equality, and good governance.
Plato and Aristotle were two influential Greek philosophers whose writings shaped political thought for centuries. Plato advocated for a utopian ideal republic ruled by philosopher-kings and defined by justice, while Aristotle analyzed different types of governments and believed the ideal form was a constitutional republic. Their concepts of virtue, citizenship, and using political power for the common good still resonate in modern Greece, though the current democracy differs from their visions in some ways. Their timeless principles remain an inspiration for societies seeking justice, equality, and good governance.
Plato and Aristotle were two influential Greek philosophers whose writings shaped political thought for centuries. Plato advocated for a utopian ideal republic ruled by philosopher-kings and defined by justice, while Aristotle analyzed different types of governments and believed the ideal form was a constitutional republic. Their concepts of virtue, citizenship, and using political power for the common good still resonate in modern Greece, though the current democracy differs from their visions in some ways. Their timeless principles remain an inspiration for societies seeking justice, equality, and good governance.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14
The influence of Plato and
Aristotle in contemporary Greece
COURSE: PHILOSOPHY POLICY
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: PAWEL KUSIAK STUDENTS: DIMITRIOS SARANTOU MARIA TSIMARA
Introduction
Plato
and Aristotle are two of the most important
philosophers whose writings have influenced the future and the thinking of the whole world Plato was a student of Socrates. He was born from a conservative family so, he was against oligarchy. The death of his teacher made him critical towards democracy. He wrote the Republic in which is explains his utopian regime. Aristotle was a student of Plato and he attended at Academy. Aristotle was hesitant towards not only democracy, but also oligarchy and tyranny. He tried to find out which form of government is the best one.
The Platonic ideal republic
Plato
introduces in his fantastical political
innovation the ideal form of government. One of the most fundamental concepts in this book is justice, which is defined as a situation in which everybody does what he is delivered to do. There are three classes: the philosopher-rulers, the guardians and the producers, all aiming to satisfaction of common good.
The Platonic ideal republic
Who is responsible to govern? What is the nature of
democracy ? The allegory of the cave
The Platonic ideal republic
Using this allegory, Plato compares the prisoners to
normal people, who are enchained by oblivion, shadows
to fake reality and the light of the sun to the power of knowledge and virtue. He strongly implies the need that the freed prisoner, who is compared to philosophers, should come back to the cave, unchain the others and led the to the hard path which leads to the light. Protagoras: deals with the teachable of virtue, which is related to who has the proper wisdom and logic so as to participate in public affairs.
Political philosophy of Aristotle
Politics is the sequel of Nicomachean Ethics, in which he
discusses the meaning of happiness () and virtue.
Aristotle believed that ethics and politics were closely linked. The ideas of Aristoteles for political community are best described in Politics in which he results that political community is actually the evolution of family and villages. He claims that human is a political animal by nature. Family and villages could make him secure his life and political community secure the quality of his life ( ). Each community has a certain purpose of existence, political communitys final goal is the common good and sufficiency ().
Political philosophy of Aristotle
He investigates what does citizen means and what defines him. For Aristotle, citizen is the one who takes part directly in every
part of political life, such as justice and public proceedings.
He thinks about regimes trying to find out which is the best possible regime and how could this be stable and prevent revolutions. Three true forms of government: monarchy, aristocracy, and polity (constitutional republic). The deviated forms of these are tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. Democracy is a government of the many and poor, and oligarchy of the few and rich. He deals with the kinds of democracy, depending in which is the preponderant value, the laws or the people.
Their influence in Modern Greece
The dictums of Plato and Aristotle have been a legacy for
Greece. Greek revolution of 1821 had as a rule the
principles which these two great philosophers had stated. The value of freedom has so predominant role in the Republic as in the Politics. In proportion, we could compare philosopher-rulers from the allegory of the cave of Plato to many of intellectuals of this period, who helped Greek prisoners to get free from their chains even if none of them was will to govern according to philosopher rulers.
Their influence in Modern Greece
Focusing on the history of modern Greece we could
realize that the principles of these philosophers were not
been followed precisely. In Protagoras he deals with the political virtue and if there is the ability to be taught and he also thinks if it is right everybody to participate in political life. Some conservative people would claim that it is not fair for half-taught to be a part of politics since they are easily manipulated. For this manipulation, main responsible are the means of communication and information, such as television and journalists, whose propaganda we could compare to the shadows that prisoners see as truth.
Their influence in Modern Greece
In the Republic justice means that every social class
doing its duty, leading the whole community to
happiness. Sometimes, this means that a certain person should compromise his interest in the name of common good. Does this fact affect his freedom? Does unlimited freedom strike justice? The coercion of philosopher rulers: sometimes is necessary to force unwilling illuminated people to govern. It is obvious that the ethical meditation about using violence aiming to the common good is still crucial.
Their influence in Modern Greece
In the modern Greece, the view of Aristotle is
overruled, since the present regime is Constitutional
Representative Republic. Republic also is an utopia which makes it really hard to be invoked. The kind of democracy that is invoked in Greece nowadays seems similar to one of the kinds of democracy that Aristotle had descripted, but lacks in the ideal standards.
Their influence in Modern Greece
Citizenship: this word does not have yet the same
meaning that Aristotle had given.
When we are talking about a citizen in modern Greece, we actually mean this person who has a legal bound with the state, giving him some prerogatives and some duties as well. Aristotle had defined as citizen the person who has an active role in the political proceedings. Therefore, in Modern Greece, more and more people do not seem to interest about these, so they tend to lose their title as political animal.
Epilogue
It is clear that these two philosophers had such
great visions which if every society had adopted, it would have been in such situation that all of its citizens could be happy and fundamental principles, like justice, equality and freedom, would not be disputed. Greece, as the mother country of them, tried to preserve their values, despite the fact that it was extreme difficult to formulate them. The most significant issue is that their principles remain indelible in time.
Dante: "The Central Man of All the World": A Course of Lectures Delivered Before the Student Body of the New York State College for Teachers, Albany, 1919, 1920