CH 2 Drilling Fluids
CH 2 Drilling Fluids
CH 2 Drilling Fluids
Drilling Fluid
s
Contents
Functions
Classification of drilling fluids
Drilling fluid properties and testing procedures
Drilling fluid formulation, additives and
treatment
Drilling fluid calculations
Drilling fluid discharge
Maintain
borehole stability
Minimise
loss of fluid
to the formation
Suspend barite
under static and
dynamic conditions
Control
formation
pressure
Remove
drilling cuttings
from the hole
Provide hydraulic
horse power
to the bit
Lubricate
the drill string
10
11
Inert phase
(eg. barite, sand)
Drilling
Drilling
fluid
fluid
Colloidal phase
(eg. clay)
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
Chemical phase
12
Common mud
addtives
Viscosifiers
(Thickeners)
Weighting Materials
Barite
Hematite
Galena
Calcium carbonate
Emulsifiers
Dissolved salts
Oil in water
Water in oil
Viscosity-Reducing
Chemicals
Bentonite
Attapulgite
CMC
HEC
PAC
Synthetic polymers
Guar gums
Resin
Lost-Circulation
Materials
Silicates
Phosphates
Granular
Tannates
Fibrous
Lignites
Flaked
Lignosulfonate
Special
Additives
Slurries
Fluid-Loss
Sodium polyacrylate
Flocculants
Reducers
Corrosion control
Starches
Defoamer
CMC
pH control
Polyanionic cellulose Acrylates
Mud lubricant
Bentonite
Antidifferential
Dispersants
sticking material
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak
Ismail, UTM
12
13
Principal
Component
Specific
Gravity
Hardness
(Mohs Scale)
% Acid
Soluble
PbS
7.4 7.7
2.5 2.7
Hematite
Fe2O3
4.9 5.3
5.5 6.5
50+
Magnetite
Fe3O4
5.0 5.2
5.5 6.5
Fe2O3
4.7
FeO.TiO2
4.5 5.1
5.0 6.0
20
Barite
BaSO4
4.2 4.5
2.5 3.5
Siderite
FeCO3
3.7 3.9
3.5 4.0
95+
Celesite
SrSO4
3.7 3.9
3.5 4.0
Dolomite
CaCO3.MgC
O3
CaCO3
2.8 2.9
3.0 3.5
99
2.6 2.8
3.0
99
Galena
Iron Oxide
(manufactured)
Illmenite
Calcite
14
Clay in water
15
Types of mud
Water Based Muds (WBM) or
Water Based Drilling Fluids (WBDF)
Mud
Mud
types
types
Gases Fluids
(air, gas, mist, foam,
aerated muds)
16
Bentonite; 7%
Brine; 18%
Barite; 15%
NADF; 46%
Seawater; 76%
Barite; 33%
17
Drilling
fluids
Oil base
True
Invert
Lightly
treated
Organic
Pneumatic
Water base
Noninhibitive
Native
Inorganic
Inhibitive
Minimum
solids
Ca++
Air
Ionic
inhibition
Na+
K+
Gas
Mist or
foam
Incapsulation
NH4+
18
19
Limitations:
Suitability/properties
High cost
20
Rheological models
21
Mud properties
Density (mud weight)
Viscosity
Gel strength
Filtration
Mud cake
Emulsion stability
Standard
drilling fluids testing:
Resistivity
- API RP 13B-1 (Recommended Practice for Field Testing Water-Based Drilling Fluids
- API
pHRP 13B-2 (Recommended Practice for Field Testing Oil-Based Drilling Fluids
Lubricity
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
22
m
(ppg, lb/cuft, S.G., ppb, psi/1000)
v
Mud balance calibrated at 8.33 ppg (water)
or
62.4 lb/cuft or 1.0 g/cc
Mud balance
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
23
Mud balance
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
24
10.8
0
75
Saturated
Salt Water
2.0
0.5
0.4
Weighted Mud
(Barite)
Stable Foam
Mist
Air
0.002
Types
of
Fluids
Relative
Densities
Types
of Drilling
Drilling
Fluids
and
Their
Relative
Densities
Types
of
drilling
fluidsand
and Their
their relative
densities
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
2.3
Viscosity
25
26
Viscosity
F
l
=0
ML/T 2
2
shearing stress
F/A
M
L
L/T
rate of shearing strain
/l
LT
L
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
27
28
s
a
l
P
s
d
i
lu
f
ic
n
a
i
on
t
w
e
N
s
d
i
flu
29
comparative
Calibration: 26 0.5 sec. (water)
Marsh funnel
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
30
(b) Rheometer
Determine: a , p , Yb , gel or shear strength
p = 600 - 300
cp
a = 600
cp
Yb = 300 - p
lb/100 ft2
Yb = a - p)
or
a = p + Yb
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
31
600
Slope proportional to p
300
Yb
Slope proportional to a
Plug flow
Yt, True yield
300
Setting, rpm
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
600
32
Gel strength
A measure of the shearing stress necessary
to initiate a finite rate of shear
Measured at 3 rpm using rheometer
Reported as initial gel strength (10 sec.) &
final gel strength (10 min.)
Unit: lb/100 ft2
33
Filtration properties
Filter press: measure the filtration, water
loss & mud cake thickness
Using 100 psig, filter paper
Filtrate volume: cc/30 min.
Mud cake thickness: /32 in.
In field testing, it is common practice to
double the 7 min. filtration loss & report
this as the 30 min. figure
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
34
35
36
en
m
i
er
p
x
E
lo
r
e
t
t fli
te
c
e
r
Cor
ta
a
d
ss
lo
r
e
filt
r
u
c
ss
ve
16
Time
Time, min.
30
25 30
36
37
V2 V1 1 / 2
where: V2 = corrected water loss at T2
V1 = measured water loss at T1
1 = viscosity of liquid phase at T1
2 = viscosity of liquid phase at T2
T1, T2 = temperatures in question
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
38
APPARATUS
PURPOSE
pH
pH paper or pH meter
Filtrate
analysis
Standard chemicals
such as acid,
indicators, etc.
Sand content
Screens, measuring
tube, centrifuge
Oil, water,
solids content
Distillation kit
Clay content
Emulsion
stability
Electrical stability
tester
Lubricity
Lubricity tester
Resistivity
Resistivity meter
39
pH
10.0
8.3
6.0
Chrome lignosulfonates
3.4 4.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
Calcium lignosulfonate
7.0
Lignite
5.0
Quebracho
3.8
4.8
6.0
7.5
9.9
40
41
Resistivity meter
pH paper/pH meter
Lubricity tester
To identify potential
hole problems
To identify their
causes
42
43
Mud Properties
Properties
The Importance
Pressure control p = 200 psi (overbalance)
Density
pm
Mud Filtrate
Gel Strength
Yield Point
Gel strength
+ Yield Point
Thinner
Weighting Materials
m
X 0.433 D 0.052 m D
8.33
Mud ability to form a thinner mud cake with low permeability on the
wall of porous medium.
Thicker mud cake means more solid materials settled at formation wall
and more filtration lost to the formation.
Thicker mud cake easier to collapse and cause other problem during
drilling activity such as the hole becomes smaller.
The ability of mud to suspend solids (especially weighting materials,
drilled cuttings).
Very important in suspended drilling operation.
The amount of pressure (shearing stress) needed to be applied to flow
the mud.
Very important in determining pump capacity and the amount of
pressure needed to be applied to flow the mud from static positions.
Carrying capacity of the mud.
The reduce mud viscosity (Yb, a, gel strength) without reducing the
mud density.
The increase mud density without causing any reaction in the mud (inert
materials).
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
43
44
Comments
Wildcat
Development
Sloughing shale
Formation
Anhydrite
Salt
High temperatures
Lost circulation
Makeup water
Composition
Availability
Rig selection
Nature of producing formations
Casing program
Availability of products
44
45
Not testing the quality of the make-up water & treating it properly
Mixing the additives too rapidly or in an incorrect order
Not matching the correct drilling fluid with soil type
Mixing too low of a concentration of additives to allow them to
perform properly
Failure to maintain slurry flow throughout the bore
Failure to calculate the volumes of water & additives that are required
Failure to calculate the drilling/reaming speeds so as not to outrun
fluid flow
Poor bore planning
Not calculating pullback rates vs. pump volume output
Thinking that loss of fluid returns will not lead to problems
Ignoring the importance of mud reclaiming systems and maintenance
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
46
bbl
bbl 42 gal 3785 cc
350 cc
bbl
gal
lb
g
bbl 350 cc
e.g. 12 ppb 12 g / 350 cc
Mud Calculations
Writing expressions for these assumptions:
Vs Vi V f
Volume basis:
............... (1)
sVs iVi f V f
............... (2)
Weight basis:
where:
Vs =
Vi =
Vf =
s =
i =
f =
Solving for Vs:
volume of solid
volume of initial mud (or any liquid)
final volume of mixture
density of solid
density of initial mud
density of final mud
Vs
V f ( f i )
s i
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
............... (3)
sV f ( f i )
sVs
s i
............... (4)
Example 1
A 9.5 lb/gal mud contains clay (SG = 2.5) and fresh
water. Compute (a) the volume % and (b) the weight %
clay in this mud.
Eq. 3: Vs
V f ( f i )
s i
sV f ( f i )
Eq. 4: sVs
s
i
Solution 1
(a) Altering Eq. (3):
Volume % solids
Vs
100%
Vf
f i
100%
s i
9.5 8.33
100%
(2.5)(8.33) 8.33
9.4%
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
sVs
100%
fVf
s ( f i )
100%
f ( s i )
20.8(9.5 8.33)
100%
9.5(20.8 8.33)
20.6 %
Example 2
For laboratory purposes, it is desired to mix one liter of
bentonite-fresh water mud having a viscosity of 30 cp:
Eq. 3: Vs
(a) What will be the resulting mud density?
(b) How much of each material should be used?
V f ( f i )
s i
Solution 2
(a) From Fig. 6.12 (assume Wyoming bentonite): (b) Vs 1,000(1.045 1.0)
2.5 1.0
Solid content = 3.0 % by volume.
Rearranging Eq. 3:
0.03
f i
s i
f 1.0
2.5 1.0
30 cc
2.5 30
75 g
Also:
Vi V f Vs
Therefore,
1,000 30
970 cc water
(Vi Vs )( f i )
s i
............... (3a)
(From Eq. 1)
Vi ( f i )
s f
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
............... (5)
Example 3
a)
Solution 3
(a)
(b)
Vs
Vi ( f i )
s f
1 sack
1
bbl
; 15 sacks
0.0664 bbl / sack
15 4.3(8.33) f
Sb
15 Vi ( f i )
35.8 f
............... (5a)
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
100 lb
0.641 cuft
Note: Assume SG of clay = 2.5
2.5 (62.4 lb / cuft )
0.641 cuft
Vi ( f i )
Sc
8.75 2.5(8.33) f
8.75 Vi ( f i )
Sc
20.8 f
............... (5b)
Example 4
(a) How many sacks of barite are necessary to increase the
density of 1000 bbl of mud from 10 to 14 lb/gal?
(b) What will be the final mud volume?
Eq. (5a)
Solution 4
(a) Using Eq. (5a):
Sb
(b)
2,752
V f 1,000
1,183 bbl
15
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
Sb
15 Vi ( f i )
35.8 f
Vw Vi V f
w Vw i Vi f V f
w Vw i Vi f (Vw Vi )
w Vw f Vw f Vi i Vi
Vw
Vi ( f i )
w f
Vw
Vi ( i f )
f w
............... (6)
where,
Vw = bbls of water necessary to reduce the density of Vi bbls
initial mud from i to f
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
Example 5
(a) How much fresh water must be added to 1000 bbl of 12 lb/gal
mud to reduce its density to 10 lb/gal?
Vi ( i f )
(b) What will the resulting volume be?
Eq. (6) Vw
f
Solution 5
1, 000 (12 10)
1,197 bbls
(a) Vw
10 8.33
or:
(b)
12,000 10,000
1,197 bbls
10 8.33
Example 6
(a) How many sacks of barite are required to raise the mud weight of 755 bbl
from 77 pcf to 92 pcf? What is the resulting volume?
(b) Calculate the new mud weight when 126 bbl of oil (SG = 0.8) is added to
the new system. What is the resulting volume?
(c) Determine the quantity of barite required to maintain a mud weight of 92
pcf. What is the final volume?
Solution 6
(a) Eq. (5a):
Sb
Sb
15 Vi ( f i )
35.8 f
965 sacks
V f Vi Vb 755 bbl
819 bbls
15 sacks / bbl
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
(b) Vo Vi V f
o Vo i Vi f V f
o Vo i Vi o Vo i Vi
f
Vf
Vo Vi
0.8(62.4 pcf ) (126 bbl ) (92 pcf ) (819 bbl )
f
86.4 pcf
(126 819) bbl
V f Vi Vo 819 bbl 126 bbl 945 bbls
(c)
Eq. (5a):
Sb
15 Vi ( f i )
35.8 f
450 sacks
975 bbls
15 sacks / bbl
g/350 cc lb/bbl
Example 7
A mud engineer finds from pilot tests that 2.0 g of CMC is required to
obtain the desired water loss reduction for a one liter mud sample. How
much CMC should be added to the actual 1000 barrel system?
Solution 7
CMC needed
350
2.0 1000 700 lb
1000
q 0.00679 SN (2 D 2 d 2 ) e
............... (7)
where:
q
= pump discharge rate, gal/min
S
= stroke length, in.
N
= complete strokes per minute
D
= piston (liner) diameter, in.
d
= piston rod diameter, in.
e
= pump volumetric efficiency, commonly used as 90% for
power pumps and 85% for steam.
tc
Vm
............... (8)
Example 8
What is the cycle time for the following conditions?
Vm = 1,000 bbl
Pump liners = 7.5 in. diameter
Stroke length = 16 in.
Eq. 8: tc
Piston rod diameter = 2 in.
N = 40 strokes per minute
Power pump is used
6180 Vm
SN (2 D 2 d 2 )e
Solution
tc
(6,180)(1,000)
100 min.
2
2
(16)(40) (2)(7.5) (2.25) (0.90)
67
68
OPERATIONAL
Safety
Processing rate
Mechanical reliability
Size and portability of
unit(s)
Condition of end products
Number of additional
personnel required
Method of disposal after
processing
Weather conditions
Human health
issues/chemical exposure
ENVIRONMENT
Removal of HC , heavy
metals and salts from solids
and water
Reduction in volume of
waste
Compliance with
regulations
Marine species potentially
at risk
Potential environmental
stressors
69
70
71
72
crustaceae
96 hr LC50 Test: Testing animal that is used for this test is tiger prawn and
small crustaceae.
TCLP test (Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure): Determination of
heavy metal content on cutting on arsenic, barium, boron, cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc.
Water Analysis: pH (6-9), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) ( 10,000 ppm),
TSS (Total suspended solids) ( 2,000 ppm), COD (chemical oxygen
demand) ( 400), oil content ( 50 mg/L)
United Kingdom
Prohibited any toxic chemicals, certain types of metals from discharge.
Where other metals are limited to concentrations of < 100 ppm
Products that were planned for discharges must be reported to the
government.
OBM testing were done using the brown shrimp using the 96 hr LC 50 test.
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
73
USA
Limitations or
Monitoring Required
Oil-Based Mud
Generic Muds
Alaska Region
Discharge prohibited
Authorized subject to
limitations on additives.
Combined generic formulas
into 6 rather than 8 mud
systems.
Additives
Bioassays
California Region
Discharge prohibited
Authorized based on
toxicity of generic muds.
Maximum toxicity of
30,000 ppm.
Gulf of Mexico
Region
Discharge
prohibited
Requirements
based on toxicity
of generic muds.
Maximum toxicity
of 30,000 ppm.
Federal Region
Discharge prohibited
Requirements based on toxicity
of generic muds. Maximum
toxicity of 30,000 ppm.
74
75
The principal legislation that is relevant to the offshore and onshore petroleum
developments in Malaysia: Environmental Quality Act, 1974 (EQA)
Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1984 (EEZ)
Adopted regulations from China and Japan
Requires all aqueous effluent to be treated prior to discharge to marine (100
ppm oil limit)
Drill cuttings are discharge overboard while drill mud are recovered and recycle
Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail, UTM
76